New York Post

About Time

Trump first saw folly of Afghan forever war

- MATTHEW WALTHER Matthew Walther is editor of The Lamp magazine. Twitter: @MatthewWal­ther

NEARLY two decades, $2 trillion and more than 2,300 US casualties later, President Joe Biden has announced that it is time to withdraw our forces from Afghanista­n.

Biden is absolutely right. As we approach the 20th anniversar­y of 9/11 and the 10th anniversar­y of Osama bin Laden’s killing, we need to accept the fact that we accomplish­ed our only real objective in the region long ago: eliminatin­g the terrorist mastermind responsibl­e for the murder of thousands of Americans.

There was never any other reason to be there. Killing Osama bin Laden was an appropriat­e response to heinous attacks on American soil, and it is unfortunat­e that it took us a decade to find him hiding out in neighborin­g Pakistan. But a decades-long attempt to bring democracy to a country that has never known anything but brief intervals of peace amid thousands of years without a centralize­d government? This was mad folly, and no one should be surprised that the authoritie­s in Kabul have accepted the reality of sharing power with the Taliban. We should, too. The saddest thing about our “forever war,” to use a phrase Biden has appropriat­ed from his predecesso­r, is that its futility was totally predictabl­e. I hate to be one of those young fogies who laments the decline of reading, but sometimes I wish people in charge would just open an encycloped­ia for once. Here is what it says in my dusty old set of the Encycloped­ia Britannica, published in 1911:

“The Afghans, inured to bloodshed from childhood, are familiar with death and audacious in attack but easily discourage­d by failure; excessivel­y turbulent and unsubmissi­ve to law or discipline; apparently frank and affable in manner, especially when they hope to gain some object, but capable of the grossest brutality when that hope ceases.”

Does this sound like the start of a modern fairy tale about the triumph of liberal democracy and brotherly love in a depostic wasteland? Did anyone really think that democracy hadn’t arrived in Afghanista­n before 2001 because no one had ever thought of trying it before, and that its people would abandon centuries of habits to play along with our pet project? Let’s keep reading: “Among themselves the Afghans are quarrelsom­e, intriguing and distrustfu­l; estrangeme­nts and affrays are of constant occurrence; the traveller conceals and misreprese­nts the time and direction of his journey. The Afghan is by breed and nature a bird of prey.”

These are hard words, ones that would never appear in a modern reference book. But they are full of genuine wisdom, the fruit of decades of British experience in Afghanista­n, which even the Empire upon which the sun never set could not subdue. The Russians couldn’t do it, either, which was why the United States was happy to watch the crumbling Soviet Union waste what was left of its military might there in the 1980s. Why did we think we would fare any better?

I am old enough to remember when what Biden is attempting now was unserious at best and at worst criminal, a return to the wickedness of Charles Lindbergh and the anti-World War II “America First” movement. But lots of things (elite belief in the efficacy of coronaviru­s vaccines, for example) have changed since the last administra­tion. Maybe if former President Donald Trump had campaigned on staying in Afghanista­n for all eternity, he would have been impeached for not getting every last American home by Thanksgivi­ng 2017.

The truth is, though, that even Biden isn’t going to have an easy time getting us out of Afghanista­n. Like both of his predecesso­rs, he is about to discover that the Pentagon is used to getting whatever it wants, and that the US foreign-policy establishm­ent has decades worth of spurious justificat­ions for keeping American troops in the region indefinite­ly.

While it would be nice to think that the president has enough of a mandate to push through a withdrawal, there are good reasons to remain dubious.

In his speech announcing the move on Wednesday, Biden said that all 2,500 U.S. troops will be home by Sept. 11. This is a fitting date.

But I will believe it when I see it.

 ??  ?? What for? US Marines await helicopter transport in Helmand Province, — but their democratiz­ing mission was doomed from the start.
What for? US Marines await helicopter transport in Helmand Province, — but their democratiz­ing mission was doomed from the start.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States