New York Post

Mike Vaccaro

With Madden’s passing, America lost its best and favorite teacher OPEN MIKE

- Mvaccaro@nypost.com

JOHN Madden was a teacher before he became a Hall of Fame coach, before he became one of the great TV broadcaste­rs in the history of the medium, before he became the name (and face) of a seminal video game.

It was those teaching instincts that served him best in winning 103 games and a Super Bowl coaching the Raiders, in piling up 16 Emmy Awards, in making sure the game that bore his name, at its rudimentar­y start, was 11-on-11, because he saw Madden as not just a way to kill time but also as a way to learn about football.

The best TV analysts do that, of course. They teach you. They make complicate­d games seem perfectly simple because their words allow us to understand the game better than we did before. That was Madden’s greatest gift to football fame, which followed him from CBS to Fox to ABC to NBC, and would’ve followed him to Styrofoam-cups-and-string if that was the only way we could listen to him.

But Madden, like the other best of the best — and like all terrific teachers, whether they’re explaining the prevent defense or the Pythagorea­n theorem — also had a way of making you smile, both because he was funny and because he allowed you in on his little secret pockets of knowledge.

My friend Tom Pecora, who has dabbled in broadcasti­ng when he wasn’t coaching hoops, now assisting Baker Dunleavy at Quinnipiac, put it this way the other day: “The world we live in now will never allow highly intelligen­t and articulate characters to entertain us with funny, irreverent observatio­ns. We take ourselves way too serious now.”

Madden really was unique among football announcers in that he took football seriously, but never himself, he always seemed to be having a hell of a time, and he wanted to make sure we did, too. How many announcers (outside the Manning brothers) do we have fun with anymore? Tony Romo showed early promise, combining Madden’s combo of humor and an insider’s eye, but too often lately he comes off as ill-prepared and goofy.

Madden was never those. There have been others. Nobody ever would have asked to see Al

McGuire’s degree from the Connecticu­t School of Broadcasti­ng, but McGuire, like Madden, made you a smarter fan just by listening to him. Jim Valvano’s all-too-brief run at ABC and ESPN did the same thing. Dick Vitale is best known for his catch-phrases and his schtick, which is a shame, because when he breaks down the game he does it in simple, easy-todigest ways that simply make the game more understand­able.

The baseball version of Madden was Tim McCarver, whose national work was polarizing because everyone believed he hated their team. But for those of us who grew up on McCarver’s Mets broadcasts on Channel 9, where he worked from 1983-98, you knew that Mets games weren’t just where you went to see the daily brilliance of Keith Hernandez, Gary Carter and the young Darryl Strawberry, it’s where McCarver gave a master class on baseball’s ins and outs night after night. Hernandez and Ron Darling, on SNY, hint at that as regularly as anyone now, and so does David Cone on YES.

We need more of that. We need more broadcaste­rs who aren’t afraid to be themselves, who aren’t afraid to show some humor in order to hammer the point home. Jeff Van Gundy gives us flashes of that. Romo still does, though not as often as he probably should, given his reputation. If the TNT studio crew of Shaq O’Neal, Charles Barkley and Kenny Smith did NBA games, that might best replicate for basketball what Madden did all those years for football.

In the last words he ever typed, the great columnist Red Smith said he always comforted himself watching ordinary ballplayer­s thusly: “Someday there would be another Joe DiMaggio.”

Someday, maybe, there’ll be another John Madden. Let’s hope so.

 ?? ??
 ?? AP ?? NO ONE COMPARES: John Madden’s ability to teach and entertain is unmatched among broadcaste­rs today, writes Mike Vaccaro.
AP NO ONE COMPARES: John Madden’s ability to teach and entertain is unmatched among broadcaste­rs today, writes Mike Vaccaro.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States