New York Post

False Alarmists

Power-hungry Dems paint absurd pic of Jan. 6

- James Bovard is the author of 10 books. JAMES BOVARD

LAST year’s Jan. 6 clash at the Capitol may be the most politicall­y exploited ruckus in American history. Team Biden is doing a victory lap to mark the anniversar­y, but the feds continue covering up key informatio­n regarding that day’s events. Democrats are canonizing a false version of history to change voting laws to perpetuate many of the shoddy if not shady practices that tarnished the 2020 election.

After the fracas a year ago, Democratic members of Congress made ludicrous claims about the perils they faced that day. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said, “We came close to half of the House nearly dying” from the attackers. But the only person gunned down that day was 35year-old Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt, shot at point-blank range by a Capitol policeman.

While heavy penalties are justified for protesters who physically attacked police, President Biden and his media allies portray clashes that day as an insurrecti­on seeking to destroy American democracy. But Reuters reported in August that the FBI had found little or no evidence that the attackers were part of an “organized plot to overturn the presidenti­al election,” with almost all protesters “one-off cases” unrelated to a grand scheme.

The Justice Department declared last summer, “The investigat­ion and prosecutio­n of the Capitol Breach will be the largest in American history, both in terms of the number of defendants prosecuted and the nature and volume of the evidence.”

But the feds continue withholdin­g almost all of the 14,000 hours of surveillan­ce video taken inside the Capitol Jan. 6. A coalition of 16 media groups including The Washington Post, Associated Press and television networks have sued to gain access to it. BuzzFeed won a legal battle in September and posted a short clip of protesters walking peacefully inside the Capitol Jan. 6 — a jarring contradict­ion to the “Democracy damn near died” narrative.

One of the biggest Jan. 6 mysteries is why law-enforcemen­t agencies ignored the torrent of warnings of potential trouble that day. A Washington Post investigat­ion condemned “one of the biggest security failures in the nation’s history.” The US Capitol Police have almost 2,000 officers and a budget larger than that of Detroit and St. Louis. However, fewer than 200 Capitol police “were deployed to interior or exterior posts at the US Capitol” Jan. 6 — as if the cops were prepping for the annual Future Farmers of America visit.

The New York Times reported in September that the FBI had informants involved in the hubbub, including one who texted his FBI handler updates as the clashes escalated. “How many January 6th protesters were actually working for the federal government?” Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) asked Attorney General Merrick Garland at a recent congressio­nal hearing, but Garland refused to answer.

Did any federal operatives help instigate conflicts? Newsweek revealed this week that hundreds of heavily armed secret commandos with shoot-to-kill orders were deployed around the Capitol prior to the clash with demonstrat­ors.

“Trespassin­g plus thought crimes equals terrorism” is the standard the Biden administra­tion is using to prosecute defendants. But the official Jan. 6 storyline is getting shot to pieces in federal court. Judge Trevor McFadden slammed prosecutor­s for pillorying Jan. 6 protesters while dropping charges against individual­s who engaged in far worse behavior during violent summer 2020 protests in Washington.

Judge Amit Mehta criticized prosecutor­s for charging hundreds of protesters with “obstructin­g an official proceeding” of Congress — a felony with a 20-year prison sentence — while similar protesters in prior years got misdemeano­r wrist-slaps. Judge Beryl Howell derided prosecutor­s for “almost schizophre­nic” behavior for denouncing Jan. 6 as an “attack on democracy” but then merely charging some protesters with “parading” in the Capitol.

Democrats are exploiting Jan. 6 to seek to block any voting reforms that would make election results more credible. A hysterical New York Times editorial, “Every Day Is Jan. 6 Now,” declared, “Republican lawmakers in 41 states have been trying to advance the goals of the Jan. 6 rioters . . . in a bloodless, legalized form that no police officer can arrest and that no prosecutor can try in court.”

But when did verifying ballots become a crime against democracy? Many of the same Democrats who champion vaccine passports that disproport­ionately bar blacks from restaurant­s also insist that requiring voters to show ID is Jim Crow at its worst. Democrats are pushing for universal mail-in balloting even though a 2012 New York Times analysis recognized that fraud is “vastly more prevalent” in mailed ballots.

Americans deserve to see all the video and federal agency records, including those of undercover operatives, tied to Jan. 6. In the meantime, citizens should scoff at the ludicrous “almost a martyr” routine from members of Congress who have dismally failed to expose why the Capitol Police and other law-enforcemen­t agencies blundered so badly that day.

 ?? ?? Photo op: Dems claimed threats still required barbed wire in March 2021.
Photo op: Dems claimed threats still required barbed wire in March 2021.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States