New York Post

JOE: KILL FILIBUSTER TO GET ‘ROE’

- By CALLIE PATTESON, STEVEN NELSON and SAMUEL CHAMBERLAI­N

President Biden made an extraordin­ary attack on the Supreme Court during a news conference in Madrid on Thursday, accusing the judiciary of “outrageous behavior” in overturnin­g Roe v. Wade last week — before adding that he supported Senate Democrats changing the 60-vote filibuster to codify abortion rights.

“The one thing that has been destabiliz­ing is the outrageous behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States,” Biden told reporters at the conclusion of this week’s NATO summit in Spain. “And overruling not only Roe v. Wade, but essentiall­y challengin­g the right to privacy. We’ve been a leader in the world in terms of personal rights and privacy rights. And it is a mistake, in my view, for the Supreme Court [to] do what it did.

“I believe we have to codify Roe v. Wade in the law, and the way to do that is to make sure that the Congress votes to do that,” Biden later said. “And if the filibuster gets in the way . . . we provide an exception for this.”

Republican­s slammed Biden for casting aside the historical mantra that “politics stops at the water’s edge” to attack the court.

“Attacking a core American institutio­n like the Supreme Court from the world stage is below the dignity of the president,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said in a statement. “Beyond that, President Biden’s attacks on the court are unmerited and dangerous. He’s upset

that the court said the people, through their elected representa­tives, will have a say on abortion policy. That does not destabiliz­e democracy — it affirms it. By contrast, it is behavior like the president’s that undermines equal justice and the rule of law.

“It’s unthinkabl­e for the president to attack a co-equal branch of government in front of NATO. This is not leadership and undermines our authority on the world stage,” tweeted Rep. Kevin Hern (R-Okla.).

Democrats tried once before to enshrine the right to an abortion in federal law but failed to do so before the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organizati­on on June 24.

In that ruling, the court upheld a Mississipp­i law prohibitin­g the procedure after 15 weeks of pregnancy and found that the final say over whether abortion should be legal rests with the states. Following the decision, a number of states implemente­d so-called “trigger laws” that banned or restricted abortion with immediate effect.

When Kelly O’Donnell of NBC News later pressed the president on his support for changing the filibuster, Biden clarified that the change was meant to enshrine the “right to privacy, not just abortion rights.”

“But yes, abortion rights,” the president added.

Two moderate Democratic senators, Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, have opposed changing the chamber’s legislativ­e filibuster, which requires 60 votes to pass most bills — almost an impossible ask in the 50-50 Senate.

A Manchin spokespers­on told The Post on Thursday that the senator’s position on the filibuster “has not changed.”

‘Nuclear option’

Sinema’s office directed The Post to an op-ed the senator wrote in June of last year in which she asked: “To those who want to eliminate the legislativ­e filibuster to expand health-care access . . . would it be good for our country if we did, only to later see that legislatio­n replaced by legislatio­n . . . defunding women’s reproducti­ve-health services?”

At least two Republican senators — Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska — favor legal access to abortion, but neither has endorsed doing away with the 60-vote rule.

Biden last year spoke out against changing Senate rules, saying it would “throw the entire Congress into chaos.” However, he later threw his support behind altering the filibuster in January to pass two sweeping election-reform bills. That effort failed when Manchin and Sinema voted against the so-called “nuclear option.”

Before wrapping up the news conference, Biden appealed to voters to express their dissatisfa­ction with the ruling at the ballot box. Fellow Democrats have tried to use the abortion ruling to stave off what has appeared to be a Republican wave in November spurred by public anger at the

worst inflation since 1981. “I feel extremely strongly that I’m going to do everything in my power which I legally can do in terms of executive orders as well as push the Congress and the public,” Biden said.

“The bottom line here is if you care . . . and you think this decision by the court was an outrage or a significan­t mistake, vote, show up and vote. Vote in the off year and vote, vote, vote. That’s how we’ll change it.”

The statement was an echo of Biden’s initial remarks following Friday’s ruling, in which he said: “This fall, Roe is on the ballot. Personal freedoms are on the ballot. The right to privacy, liberty and equality — they are all on the ballot.”

The White House has also said it will fight to ensure that women retain access in all states to FDA-approved medication­s that can cause an abortion and to ensure that women can travel from more restrictiv­e to less-restrictiv­e states for the procedure.

Although Biden said last week that the decision “casts a dark shadow over large swaths of the land,” as a senator he actually voted in 1982 for the same outcome via a proposed constituti­onal amendment that would have returned abortion policy to states. At the time, Biden cited his Catholic upbringing.

 ?? ?? HOSTILE: President Biden on Thursday in Spain rips into the Supreme Court’s recent overturnin­g of Roe v. Wade as “outrageous behavior,” calling the high court “destabiliz­ing” and declaring his support for codifying the right to abortion through Congress — even if that requires suspending filibuster rules. His comments, coming at the end of a NATO summit, were criticized by Republican­s as “unmerited” and in violation of the tradition of avoiding comment on domestic issues while overseas.
HOSTILE: President Biden on Thursday in Spain rips into the Supreme Court’s recent overturnin­g of Roe v. Wade as “outrageous behavior,” calling the high court “destabiliz­ing” and declaring his support for codifying the right to abortion through Congress — even if that requires suspending filibuster rules. His comments, coming at the end of a NATO summit, were criticized by Republican­s as “unmerited” and in violation of the tradition of avoiding comment on domestic issues while overseas.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States