New York Post

It won’t be Joe

Dems fooling themselves on 2024 race

- MARK PENN & ANDREW STEIN Mark Penn was a pollster and adviser to Bill and Hillary Clinton, 1995-2008. He is chairman of the Harris Poll and CEO of Stagwell. Andrew Stein, a Democrat, served as New York City Council president, 1986-94.

PRESIDENT Biden’s re-election campaign is in trouble. He likely won’t be the Democratic nominee, but he’s likely determined to put the Democratic Party through quite a rollercoas­ter ride before he and the party reach that conclusion. Most voters believe Biden should step aside and let someone new run — an AP-NORC poll out Tuesday found just 12% of Democrats want Biden to lead their party.

Until now, Biden has been allowed to avoid any serious media questionin­g. He did almost no interviews, answered questions sporadical­ly and survived on the basis of the country’s close partisan split that held fast even as many in his own party questioned his leadership.

It wasn’t the surge in crime, rampant inflation, unchecked migration across the southern border or rising fuel prices that put Biden in trouble. Somehow even as those problems mounted during his presidency’s first two years and he was blamed for much of it, Democrats stuck together.

Instead, the administra­tion’s first real questionin­g came over Document-gate, classified material that had been sitting in his offices and homes contrary to law for years. CBS

News broke the story classified documents were found in Penn Biden Center offices before the midterms — but was kept from the public.

What followed was the first real media frenzy Biden has had to face since he dropped out of the 1988 presidenti­al race after plagiarizi­ng his speech from a British politician. Biden has said in explanatio­n basically nothing beyond the fact his Corvette was stored along with the documents later found at his house.

Who really found these documents? What are the documents? Do they tie into anything of interest to Hunter Biden? Why was the informatio­n withheld from the public until broken by an investigat­ive reporter? Who else had access to these documents? Why did the vice president keep these particular documents? None of these questions has been answered.

Given all the big problems of his presidency, it’s ironic this almostirre­levant matter has opened up larger questions about Biden and his fitness for re-election. Nor are questions about the documents the real queries that merit an independen­t counsel.

For more than two years, we’ve known the president’s son and brother were running an influence-peddling business selling the Biden name. These two had absolutely nothing to sell but influence with Joe Biden, yet they received millions of dollars from Ukrainian energy companies, Chinese-government-tied investors and shady Russian figures. The only time Biden was questioned about all this was when President Donald Trump raised it in the presidenti­al debate, Biden dismissed it as Russian disinforma­tion, and the moderator moved on. Biden simply lied.

Since President Dwight Eisenhower founded NORAD in 1958, we’ve never had to shoot down anything over our skies. All of a sudden we had to shoot down four objects, including the Chinese spy balloon. Perhaps it’s because China knows it can get away with things because it has so much on the Biden family with all the business dealings between them.

Almost every major news organizati­on has certified as real the evidence on the Hunter Biden laptop, raising serious questions about both Bidens. Did Hunter commit crimes such as tax evasion and lying on a gun-permit applicatio­n? Did Joe lie when he said he never discussed his son’s business with him? Was Joe the “big guy” in the proposed fee share? Did Hunter split his income with his father? Was Joe involved with the influence-peddling business?

Was the Penn Biden Center paid for with Chinese donations? Did the Bidens solicit those donations for the University of Pennsylvan­ia? These are serious questions, and Attorney General Merrick Garland should have investigat­ed them. They’re also questions Joe Biden is unlikely to have very good answers to — or he would have answered them. Now that Republican­s have retaken the House, they will seek the answers.

Having prosecuted Trump officials for defying congressio­nal subpoenas, Garland is bound to do the same for the Republican­s or face impeachmen­t himself. And independen­t counsels have a habit of expanding their jurisdicti­on as they uncover new evidence.

More and more, Biden is also facing questions about his age and his fitness to hold on to the presidency well into his 80s. Gaffes are becoming more frequent, and the hope he would again face Donald Trump seems to be fading. Against a new Republican nominee, Biden would be forced to run an actual campaign compared to the cloaked effort in 2020 in which tech companies, debate commission­s and the media made favorable decisions to end Trump’s reign.

In 2020, Democrats picked Biden because he was needed to keep the party from naming someone too far left to win. Now the party will need someone who can take on a next-generation Republican. That Democrat is not Joe Biden.

 ?? ?? Fit to serve? Biden delivers a keynote address at a DC hotel Tuesday.
Fit to serve? Biden delivers a keynote address at a DC hotel Tuesday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States