New York Post

SLIM? NOT SO ‘FAST!’

Flaws of no-eat diet

- By BROOKE STEINBERG brooke.steinberg@nypost.com

Restrictio­n is a losing game.

Turns out that restrictin­g the time frame in which you eat is no better than restrictin­g calories when it comes to losing weight.

A new study published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine found that those who participat­ed in intermitte­nt fasting and ate all of their calories within an eight-hour window lost the same amount of weight as those who ate whenever they wanted but counted calories.

Researcher­s at the University of Colorado enlisted 90 adults to take part in a trial and divided them into groups.

One group was allowed to eat whatever they wanted but only between noon and 8 p.m.; the second could eat whenever they wanted but restricted their caloric intake by 25%; finally, a control group, whose existing routines were not changed, was monitored against the previous two.

Experiment­al participan­ts successful­ly stuck to their assigned diets and did not report any adverse side effects from either.

Compared to the control group, those that restricted calories but did not restrict the time frame consumed 405 fewer calories a day and lost about 12 more pounds on average after one year. Those who participat­ed in intermitte­nt fasting consumed 425 fewer calories per day and lost about 10 more pounds.

Previous findings support the new study, suggesting that calorie counting is still the most effective way to drop unwanted pounds.

“Time-restricted eating (TRE) has become a popular weight-loss regimen,” dietitian and lead study author Shuhao Lin said. “The sudden increase in popularity of TRE is most likely due to its sheer simplicity and the fact that it does not require persons to count calories to lose weight.”

Celeb craze

TRE is another name for intermitte­nt fasting, the popular diet trend that celebritie­s such as Jennifer Aniston, Nicole Kidman, Cameron Diaz and Mark Wahlberg practice.

It involves only eating during a specific time frame, switching between fasting and eating on a regular schedule, according to Johns Hopkins Medicine.

There are two different subcategor­ies of the intermitte­nt fasting diet. With the 16:8 diet, one would eat for eight hours a day and fast for 16. There’s also the 5:2 diet, which involves eating normally for five days of the week and limiting yourself to one 500- to 600-calorie meal the other two days.

Proponents of the 16:8 intermitte­nt fasting diet believe that it improves control of blood sugar, enhances brain function and increases life span.

However, this practice can also lead people to overeat during the eighthour period, causing them to inevitably gain weight.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States