New York Post

Plaintiffs’ statistics prove bias

- By RYAN KING

Underpinni­ng the Supreme Court’s landmark Thursday decision striking down affirmativ­e action in college admissions was stunning data highlighti­ng the vast racial disparitie­s in qualified and admitted applicants to both Harvard University and the University of North Carolina.

At Harvard (pictured), an Asian candidate in the eighth highest academic decile had 5.1% chance of admittance, compared to 7.5% for white, 22.9% for Hispanic, and 44.5% for black applicants, according to a brief filed by Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), the plaintiffs in the case.

To achieve its racial objectives, SFFA alleged that Harvard used a special ratings system that adversely affected Asian applicants.

Until 2018, Harvard leaned on a scoring metric of 1 to 6 for its “personal rating” system, with “1” being “outstandin­g” and “6” denoting “worrisome personal qualities.”

‘Anti-Asian’ skew

Asian applicants consistent­ly performed the worst on Harvard’s “personal rating” system relative to other races, while black and Hispanic applicants generally performed better.

For example, only 17.93% of Asian applicants in the top eighth academic decile earned a “1” or a “2” on the personalit­y rating, compared to 26.1% of white applicants, 32.2% of Hispanic applicants and 39.57% of black applicants, according to data in the brief.

A similar pattern of racial disparitie­s in candidate qualificat­ions were flagged at North Carolina.

Among state candidates in the eighth highest academic decile, for instance, Asian applicants had a 15.51% admission rate, compared to 15.87% for whites, 33.63% for Hispanics and 57.87% for black candidates, per the brief.

The petitioner­s also dug up shocking online messages from admissions officers.

“Perfect 2400 SAT All 5on AP one B in 11th,” one wrote.

“Brown?!” a second person replied. “Heck no. Asian,” the first answered.

“Of course. Still impressive,” the second person said.

In a different exchange, an unidentifi­ed UNC official instructed someone to move a minority candidate to a scholarshi­p section if their SAT score was above 1300:

“If its [sic] brown and above a 1300 put them in for [the] merit/Excel [scholarshi­p].”

 ?? ?? Plaintiffs in the affirmativ­e action case before the Supreme Court presented shocking data showing the racial disparity in admissions at Harvard. For students in the top 10% of academic performers, for instance, 56.1% of African-American applicants made it in, but only 12.7% of Asian Americans did.
Plaintiffs in the affirmativ­e action case before the Supreme Court presented shocking data showing the racial disparity in admissions at Harvard. For students in the top 10% of academic performers, for instance, 56.1% of African-American applicants made it in, but only 12.7% of Asian Americans did.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States