New York Post

REVEL’S IN THE DETAILS

Fine print freebie

- By NATALIE O’NEILL no’neill@nypost.com

There was fine wine in the fine print.

A United Kingdom company posted an offer to claim a free bottle of “good wine” in its online privacy agreement and nobody spotted it for months — proving pretty much nobody reads the tedious text.

Dan Neidle, of the think tank Tax Policy Associates, said he conducted the “exa periment” to have little fun while objecting to a rule that forto ces all businesses post the largely agree-ignored legal ment.

“[It was] my childish protest that all businesses have to have a privacy policy and no one reads it,” Neidle, a lawyer who heads the nonprofit, told BBC News on Thursday.

“Every tiny coffee shop has to have a privacy policy on their website, it’s crazy,” he said. “It’s money that’s being wasted.”

In February, he tucked the free-vino offer into the website’s snoozy legalese, between a warning about browser cookies and advertisin­g.

“This website uses cookies so we can remember your name if you leave a comment. You can reject them if you like. We will send a bottle of wine to the first person to read this. We don’t serve any advertisin­g,” the agreement reads.

Nobody claimed the free wine until May — and even then the person “kind of cheated” because they were just trying to write their own fine print and using it as an example, he said.

The think tank sent the eagleeyed recipient a bottle of 2013 Château de Sales (inset), which costs about $40 and is described as a “Merlot-dominant blend” with “bright notes of redcurrant and raspberry.”

Neidle first wrote about the experiment Thursday on X, saying the bottle “just got claimed.”

He said the nonprofit first made a similar hidden offer when it launched about two years ago and it took four months for someone to spot that one.

“We did it again to see if people were paying more attention,” Neidle said. “They’re not.”

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States