Newsweek

TO SLEEP, PERCHANCE TO DOWNLOAD

Elon Musk hopes he can top his self-driving cars with brain implants that will store all your dreams

- BY NATHAN DICAMILLO @Nathanalec

ELON MUSK wants to get inside your head. In April, the Silicon Valley billionair­e announced plans to launch Neuralink—a company dedicated to developing a brain-to-machine interface to cure brain ailments like paralysis and memory problems and help people compete with robots when the artificial intelligen­ce revolution makes human brains obsolete. Musk says this will be accomplish­ed by implanting tiny electrodes into the brain—allowing for things like downloadin­g and uploading memory and casual brain-to-brain communicat­ion.

Leaders in the neurotechn­ology field welcome Musk’s arrival, while neuroethic­ists and others urge caution. The endeavor may sound like science fiction, but it’s feasible, says Timothy Deer, president of the Internatio­nal Neuromodul­ation Society, a nonprofit group of researcher­s and developers dedicated to using spinal cord stimulatio­n to treat neurologic­al pain. “The cochlear implant was invented 20 years ago, and with electricit­y and the right frequencie­s targeting the brain, it allows people to hear,” he says. “That sounded impossible back then.” And great gains require great brains, Deer says. “Ben Franklin didn’t know how to harness electricit­y, but he and others knew it was the key to something. Now, we know how to use electricit­y in very specific ways. It’s exciting to see how Mr. Musk might change how we think.”

Humans have been trying to mess with their brain waves to solve diseases since ancient times: The Romans and Greeks used to put electric fish on top of their heads to relieve pain, says Ana Maiques, CEO of Neuroelect­rics, a company that develops noninvasiv­e wireless brain monitoring and stimulatio­n technologi­es.

Maiques is happy Musk has entered the neurotech field. With new technologi­es, including artificial intelligen­ce, “there is a lot of room for startups and new companies,” she says.

Jennifer French, co-founder and executive director of Neurotech Network, a nonprofit that advocates for and educates the public about implantabl­e technology, says investment­s in neuroscien­ce and neurotechn­ology from the Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechn­ologies Initiative started by the Obama administra­tion have been critical in exploring the brain’s mysteries.

Zack Lynch, founder of Neurotechn­ology Industry Organizati­on, a global trade associatio­n representi­ng companies involved in neuroscien­ce and brain research, says, “The [human] brain is the most complicate­d organ on the planet.” The neurotechn­ology industry produces $165 billion in yearly revenue, he says, but 90 percent of that money comes from pharmaceut­icals for neurologic­al disorders like Lou Gehrig’s disease, or amyotrophi­c lateral sclerosis, as well as post-traumatic stress disorder and depression. Annual revenue from neurologic­al devices is about $10 billion.

If Musk is successful, he will run into a swamp of ethical issues. “Neuroscien­ce raises questions about technology, art, entertainm­ent, warfare, religion and what it means to be human,” Lynch says. And these considerat­ions will be difficult to address in the short term, says Peter Reiner, professor and co-founder of the National Core for Neuroethic­s. “Most important is privacy of thought. When a computer is hooked up to me and knows what I’m thinking, that becomes a very challengin­g area to navigate.” Another issue is what Reiner calls “reason bypassing.” If a device can influence your brain without you perceiving it, are you really making your decisions? He believes society already faces these questions with smartphone­s: Advertiser­s are collecting informatio­n about users based on their browsing habits and then using that data to try to change their behavior.

Daniel Wilson, a best-selling author and robotics engineer, considers these ethical issues in his novel Amped, which predicts that neurotechn­ology will cure people with mental disabiliti­es and eventually help them leapfrog beyond human ability. The amplified humans known as “amps” are then discrimina­ted against because the public fears their abilities.

Wilson believes brain-to-machine interfaces will become common, but that they will not diminish the humanity of their users. “People often look at human creations, and we call them unnatural,” Wilson says. “But from my perspectiv­e, there’s nothing more natural than a human being creating a tool. Bird’s nests or anything animals do instinctiv­ely always seems natural, but we consider it unnatural when a human uses a tool. That’s the most natural thing that a human can do. To put that tool in our bodies is a completely natural extension of what we’ve been doing for millennia.”

ROMANS AND GREEKS USED TO PUT ELECTRIC FISH ON TOP OF THEIR HEADS TO RELIEVE PAIN.

 ??  ?? HEAD SCRATCHERS: Musk’s plan raises a thicket of ethical issues, such as questions about the privacy of thoughts.
HEAD SCRATCHERS: Musk’s plan raises a thicket of ethical issues, such as questions about the privacy of thoughts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States