Newsweek

Summit Fever

Despite a few false starts, the U.S. could still reach a denucleari­zation deal with North Korea. If only it doesn’t misread the signs

- BY BILL POWELL @billasia20­10

after his last trip to pyongyang in july, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo knew that Washington’s efforts to dismantle North Korea’s nuclear program were flailing. Kim Jong Un had snubbed Pompeo on the trip, visiting a potato farm outside the capital instead. Just over a month later, President Donald Trump canceled Pompeo’s next visit. “I feel we are not making sufficient progress,” he said. It had taken just two months for the glow of Trump’s historic Singapore summit with the North Korean leader to fade, and the president’s critics in the foreign policy establishm­ent were gleeful: “Stunt diplomacy” had failed.

Now, it seems that assessment may have been premature. In early September, Kim sent a letter to Trump, delivered from the demilitari­zed zone marking the North-south border in Korea. The White House has not divulged the contents of the note, but the South Koreans—who met with Kim in advance of their own summit in Pyongyang on September 18—hinted at the message in a recent statement. Kim, said a South Korean special envoy, has “unwavering trust” in Trump and wants to achieve the denucleari­zation of the Korean Peninsula “before Trump finishes his first term.”

Unsurprisi­ngly, the flattery worked.

“Kim Jong Un of North Korea proclaims ‘unwavering faith in President Trump.’ Thank you to Chairman Kim,” Trump tweeted. “We will get it done together!” Now, the administra­tion says it’s considerin­g making preparatio­ns for another meeting between Trump and Kim. Such a summit, according to a White House aide not authorized to speak publicly, could be the best way to prevent U.S.– North Korea relations from reverting to the “fire and fury” hostility of 2017. Might the North actually move toward denucleari­zation, as the South Koreans say Kim suggested? Or is the U.S. being played?

It’s no secret where Trump’s national security adviser, John Bolton, comes down. He believes the steps Pyongyang has taken to date—the partial dismantlin­g of a nuclear test site and the suspension of missile tests—are cosmetic, and he doesn’t want the U.S. to ease up on sanctions until the North makes far more serious moves to dismantle its nuclear capability. He also wants the U.S. to again pressure China and Russia to revive their sanctions against the North; the countries lifted them in the wake of the June summit.

But South Korean sources, both inside and outside the government, believe the Trump administra­tion risks badly misreading the overtures from the North. That’s why Seoul is scrambling to keep what one foreign ministry official there calls the “spirit of Singapore” alive. And South Korean officials believe they did that during a three-day summit in Pyongyang between President Moon Jae-in and Kim that began September 18. Kim agreed to shut down a plant that makes fissile material for nuclear weapons, if Washington makes its own, as yet unspecifie­d, concession­s.

(South Korean officials declined to say what they were before briefing Trump.) He also agreed to allow outside inspectors to monitor the dismantlin­g of a rocket launch site. “Very exciting!” Trump tweeted afterward, even though the U.S. believes there are other enrichment facilities in the North that Pyongyang has still not declared.

On balance, the summit bolstered those who believe Kim is ready to bargain. Among them: the highest-ranking North Korean defector, a senior member of the ruling party whose family was very close to the Kim clan in Pyongyang. In his first ever interview with Western media (the South Korean government does not want his identity revealed for security reasons), he told Newsweek that Kim wants to do two things: ensure “regime security” for the North Korean government and put his nation on the path toward “national economic prosperity,” of the sort that East Asian nations from South Korea to Japan and Taiwan earned in the second half of the 20th century. Kim, says the defector, “wants a big deal with Trump,” in which the U.S. signs a treaty formally ending the Korean War and normalizes relations with Pyongyang in return for full “denucleari­zation.”

The Moon administra­tion, through its dealings thus far with Kim, agrees with this assessment. Though left-leaning and thus viewed, in the prism of South Korean politics, as “soft” on the North, the Moon government is not naïve. It believes a deal is there to be had—provided the Trump administra­tion understand­s that it has to be a deal. That is, that the U.S. must stop insisting, in public and in private, that the North has to irreversib­ly stand down its nukes before anything else can happen.

Pyongyang thinks the “end of war declaratio­n is a foothold, the first step in the denucleari­zation process,” says Cheong Seong-chang, vice president of research planning at the Sejong Institute, a Seoul think tank, and an occasional adviser to the Moon government. “[Denucleari­zation] with no safety measures in place would be tantamount to getting stark naked at the negotiatio­n table with the U.S.”

Diplomatic­ally, this is a heavy lift. It means both sides have to agree on what they call sequencing—who’s going to do what first, and when. Any formal peace treaty would involve the Chinese, who lost tens of thousands of troops in the Korean War. Skeptics of the process both in and out of the Trump administra­tion worry that Beijing and Pyongyang could insist that any formal treaty and a normalizat­ion of relations means the U.S. has to pull its 28,000 troops out of the South.

That would be a deal-killer for Washington. But the South doesn’t necessaril­y believe that Kim would insist on it. The South Korean envoy, Chung Eun-yong, says the North Korean leader addressed the issue in their September 5 meeting: “A [formal] end-of-war declaratio­n does not have anything to do with the weakening of the U.s.–south Korean alliance or the withdrawal of troops, does it?” he quoted Kim as asking. In other words, the troops needn’t necessaril­y go.

A senior South Korean diplomat says Seoul understand­s the nervousnes­s in Washington that surrounds nearly everything Trump does—that it would be “much easier” to go back to containmen­t and deterrence when it comes to the North, and not reach for “a big deal.” Officials there know the Washington consensus on Kim: Like his father, he’s simply buying time and hoping to gain some economic benefits while pretending to negotiate.

Seoul is banking on that wisdom being wrong. And it’s pushing Trump to do what he claims to do best: make a deal.

According to a high-ranking defector, Kim wants to put North Korea on the path toward “national economic prosperity.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States