Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Mate’s socializin­g causes stir

- CAROLYN HAX Chat online with Carolyn at 11 a.m. Central time each Friday at washington­post.com. Write to Tell Me About It in care of The Washington Post, Style Plus, 1150 15th St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20071; or email

DEAR CAROLYN: I have been in a relationsh­ip for six years. From the outset it was a long-distance situation, as she was often off on extended work- related projects, but we had a very strong connection when together. We have been making plans that would mean my following her to her longterm posting. She has also been my best friend for all these years.

In the last four months, she has become much more socially integrated, primarily through a current work situation. For the past six years she wasn’t very socially engaged and spent her spare time between projects with me.

Now she is going out sometimes multiple times a week with work-related comrades. They are mostly men. She does not invite me ( I probably wouldn’t go to most of them), and I don’t know if these folks know I exist. She is much more social than I and is clearly thriving on these interactio­ns, but I am feeling left behind and ignored.

She has insisted that I have to let her do this. She feels she missed a lot when she was intensely focused on her work, and is making up for this, but also says this is just the way she is, and I will have to get used to it.

I love her deeply, but I am having a tremendous­ly hard time coping with these many evenings she spends away from me. I don’t know if I can take this forever. What if anything should/can I be doing? How much time away from a partner is too much?

— Lonely and Worried DEAR READER: No. I won’t provide ammunition for a “should,” as in, your partner should spend more time with you or shouldn’t go out frequently with male colleagues. The only ones deciding how much and what kind of time away is too much are the couple themselves.

I feel for you. Apparently you fell for a woman who was living outside her natural habitat. What you took as normal for her was not only an aberration, but also a hardship for her. You thought you were enough, she thought she’d return to a heavily populated social life as soon as her work permitted it, and you never compared notes until now.

It appears neither of you is at fault; it’s just an accident of your circumstan­ces.

But what you do now is all about choice. You can choose to recognize her as a social creature, or you can choose to resist that side of her, wishing her back into social-abnegation mode. You can choose to take or leave her as-is, or you can choose instead to hold on to these hopes for her that she’s ill-suited to fulfill.

And you can choose to talk openly about whether either of you can “take this forever.” By “this” I don’t mean your different social speeds, since people can overcome those when they freely, mutually choose to — I mean your expectatio­ns of each other.

Can you both reset them to reflect reality? Can you love, accept and support her in getting what she needs, without judging, sulking or holding her to your standard of “should”? Can she love and accept you knowing you wish she’d just stay home? Can she be honest with herself about what she needs? (“Making up for this” carries a whiff of rationaliz­ation.)

That she doesn’t invite you can mean anything from anticipati­ng your “no” to inching toward a breakup. Whatever it means, it demonstrat­es in miniature how she reconciles her louder ways with her quieter bond to you, so please tamp down your panic and ask.

DEAR CAROLYN: I did things with past partners that my new partner is judging me on. I let slip about the past since it was germane to the conversati­on, and he completely freaked out and said he has to rethink the entire relationsh­ip.

He came back later and said he wanted to continue dating, but I pointed out my past is not up for debate or judgment. He disagrees, thinks he can judge me now since I admitted I would do the same things again, and that he has the right to leave me over my past.

His argument seems logical, but I can’t explain properly when I try to refute the argument. Any ideas?

— Anonymous DEAR READER: He can judge you now, he’s correct that it’s his prerogativ­e, and he does have the right to leave you over your past.

What’s missing is the other half of his logic:

You can judge him for thinking he can have it both ways, by deeming you morally inferior and a worthy partner. Google “gaslightin­g” — he’s got you halfway there already.

And you have the right to leave him over his decision to hold this over your head — an act of control, demeaning you in perpetuity — instead of just accepting you and your past or breaking up with you, both of which are acts of integrity. I strongly suggest you exercise this right.

 ?? Washington Post Writers Group/NICK GALIFIANAK­IS ??
Washington Post Writers Group/NICK GALIFIANAK­IS
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States