Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Tried and true 6-point Formula fosters obedience

- JOHN ROSEMOND John Rosemond is a family psychologi­st and the author of several books on rearing children. Write to him at The Leadership Parenting Institute, 1391-A E. Garrison Blvd., Gastonia, N.C. 28054; or see his website at rosemond.com

I’ve said it many times, but it bears repeating: A child’s natural response to the proper presentati­on of authority is obedience; as in, the first time the child is told to do something, he does it.

Furthermor­e, research finds what common sense intuits: Obedient kids are happy kids. Therefore, whereas an obedient child is certainly a blessing to a parent, the greatest benefit of obedience accrues to the child.

Getting a child to obey is a matter of six features of parent communicat­ion that I call The Formula:

1. Speak from an upright position. I know what some other “experts” say. They are wrong.

2. Use as few words as possible to convey the instructio­n.

3. Precede the instructio­n with an authoritat­ive phrase such as “I want you to …,” “It’s time for you to …” or “I expect you to.”

4. Do not explain why you are giving the instructio­n. That results in the question, “Why?”

5. Answer “Why?” with “Because I said so.” Yes, and again, I know what some other “experts” say. They are wrong.

6. If possible, walk away. Do not stand there and give the child someone to push back against.

In September, a couple in Richmond, Va., heard me describe The Formula. Their 3-year-old has been obedient ever since. Mind you, prior to the fateful speaking engagement in question, said child ignored, complained, cried and otherwise refused to obey instructio­ns from her parents. The child’s opposition­al defiant disorder was cured in one day.

A couple who attended a small-group retreat in Atlanta in February began using The Formula with their 4-yearold. The first day, the little fellow cleaned up his toys by himself, dressed himself and when straightfo­rwardly told to stop interrupti­ng conversati­on between his parents, stopped and stayed quiet. In all three instances, firsts. When his mutually dreaded nap time came, his parents used this formula, and he took his nap without a fight (prior to this, there had always been a nap-time scene). He also had a habit of following his mother around the house. She told him to stop and leave the room. He left the room.

The parents, amazed with how much progress they had made in such a short time, applied a similar recommenda­tion of mine to their son’s refusal to eat vegetables. At dinner, they gave him one green bean cut into pieces, one-half teaspoon of fried chicken and one-half teaspoon of mashed potatoes and gravy. They informed him that when he ate everything, he could have seconds of anything. He ate everything. Over subsequent nights they increased the vegetable but not the meat or starch. A week later, he is eating a regular helping of broccoli without complaint. In addition, his teacher reports that he is now eating vegetables at school.

The proper discipline of a child is a matter of presentati­on, folks. It is not a matter of using correct consequenc­es, although there will still be times when they are necessary. The formula described above keeps the use of consequenc­es to a minimum, meaning everyone is happier.

Your great-grandmothe­r could have told you this. Despite what people in my profession have been saying for 50 years, there is nothing new under the sun concerning children.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States