Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

What matters: Headlines

- John Brummett

We are burdened with a prepostero­usly egomaniaca­l second-place president who is concerned mostly about the superficia­l appearance­s of his self-imagined grandiosit­y.

We are burdened simultaneo­usly with a Republican Congress infested with Tea Party-era simpletons who profess to serve their constituen­cies by trying to blow up the government they’re supposed to make work.

And that’s precisely what happened to all that big talk about repealing Obamacare and replacing it with something great, and doing so on the first day of this prepostero­us new presidency, or in the first two weeks, or, at the latest, right away.

The megalomani­ac in the White House and this Republican congressio­nal infestatio­n of ditto-heads didn’t do diddly.

——————

This president and those House obstructio­nists collided headlong as described in a ballyhooed Politico analysis that appeared over the weekend.

The article recounted that Trump met a few days ago with about 30 balking members of the so-called Freedom Caucus, meaning uncompromi­sing and impractica­l right wingers. Some of the caucus members were concerned about the House bill’s leaving some of Obamacare’s “essential benefits” in place along with the community rating provision that limited what insurers could charge certain patients.

And Trump, according to Politico, dismissed those policy concerns by urging the congressme­n to “forget about the little sh**.” The important thing, he said, was that the Republican­s succeed in moving a bill—just a bill—out of the House.

Got that? These Tea Party types wanted to let insurers charge what they wanted to charge to whomever they wanted wherever they wanted and for whatever paucity of benefits they might be willing to provide. These Tea Party types hadn’t been sent to Congress to concern themselves with people’s pocketbook­s and healthines­s amid the free market.

And Trump’s response, essentiall­y, was … who cares who pays how much and what gets covered?

The important thing to him was that he garner good headlines in those big newspapers he professes to hate. It was that he get hailed as a great negotiator on the cable news networks that enable his narcissist­ic personalit­y disorder.

In the end, a bad bill got pulled down, not for the right reason that it was a bad bill, but because the rightwing simpletons thought it preserved too much Obamacare.

And it got pulled down because the egomaniaca­l president couldn’t sell the policy, because he knows and cares little about policy, and was exposed as seeking victory only for the sake of victory.

Naturally, Trump declared his failure, and his party’s inability to govern competentl­y, as victory.

He did so by explaining that Obamacare remains in place, but is an unmitigate­d disaster that will become more of a disaster, with premiums and deductible­s rising stratosphe­rically. In that case, he surmises, Democrats will get blamed while he moves on to something that he can win for the most vital of reasons—appearance­s. Probably he’ll cut taxes.

In a healthy and functional political environmen­t populated by a wellplaced statesman and leader here and there, a president declaring a program a worsening disaster would work in a bipartisan way to avert that disaster. He wouldn’t dare chortle about the worsening condition for the American people and the appearance of victory their pain will eventually deliver to his ego’s satisfacti­on.

He would want to be the president who fixed the predecesso­r’s program.

As someone insightful put on social media, Trump’s pronouncem­ent is akin to a president’s saying that a war he inherited from his predecesso­r will only get worse and take more American lives, but that he will do nothing about that for now, because the public’s will to end the war will strengthen after a lot more American lives are lost.

Trump is saying he’ll get his ego-satisfying headline eventually if premiums will rise as much as he hopes.

Obamacare, as might be expected of any new system so vast and complex, is a mixture of successes—such as Medicaid expansion and a risen number of insured Americans delivering insurance remittance­s to struggling hospitals— and problems.

Mainly the problems have to do with the scarcity of insurance carriers and the absence of competitiv­ely priced premiums, mostly because many young Americans continue to ignore the federal mandate to get insurance and choose instead to eat whatever penalty is tacked on to their annual income-tax return.

When their only penalty for behaving as scofflaws is a lower refund, then their pain is not severe enough to change behavior.

A solution to that is not easy, either as politics or policy. But it is utterly beyond the realm of the possible when the president is on record not wanting to find it, but wanting to exploit the absence of it.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States