Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Letters claim Trump tried to silence ex-AG

- Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Eileen Sullivan, Eric Tucker, Stephen Ohlemacher, Vivian Salama, Jill Colvin and staff members of The Associated Press and by Devlin Barrett, Adam Entous and Karoun Demirjian of

WASHINGTON — A lawyer for former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates wrote in letters last week that President Donald Trump’s administra­tion was trying to limit her testimony at congressio­nal hearings focused on Russian meddling in the 2016 presidenti­al election. The hearing was later canceled by the House Intelligen­ce Committee chairman.

In the letters, attorney David O’Neil said he understood the Justice Department

was invoking “further constraint­s” on testimony Yates could provide at a committee hearing that had been scheduled for Tuesday. He said the department’s position was that all actions she took as deputy attorney general were “client confidence­s” that could not be disclosed without written approval.

“We believe that the Department’s position in this regard is overbroad, incorrect, and inconsiste­nt with the Department’s historical approach to the congressio­nal testimony of current and former senior officials,” O’Neil wrote in a March 23 letter to Justice Department official Samuel Ramer.

The White House said Tuesday that it did not interfere with Yates’ plans to testify.

“The Department of Justice specifical­ly told her that it would not stop her and to suggest otherwise is completely irresponsi­ble,” it said in a statement.

White House spokesman Sean Spicer later added, “We have no problem with her testifying, plain and simple.”

Yates’ lawyer said she still intended to testify and would not disclose any classified informatio­n. A requiremen­t that she not discuss even nonclassif­ied material “is particular­ly untenable given that multiple senior administra­tion officials have publicly described the same events,” O’Neil said.

House committee chairman Devin Nunes announced Friday that he was canceling the meeting, days after the committee’s first hearing in which FBI Director James Comey confirmed that the bureau was investigat­ing President Donald Trump’s associates’ ties to Russia. Canceling the hearing was one of several moves that have sparked criticism from Democrats on the committee. The typically bipartisan panel has been torn by disputes over Nunes’ ties to Trump’s campaign and questions about whether he can lead a probe independen­t of White House influence.

On Tuesday, Nunes rebuffed calls to step aside from the investigat­ion.

“It’s the same thing as always around this place — a lot of politics, people get heated, but I’m not going to involve myself with that,” he said.

Nunes declined to say if the White House had asked him to cancel the hearing.

Reporters also asked Nunes if the Trump administra­tion sought to prevent Yates from testifying, to which he replied: “Look, you guys are just speculatin­g. I’m sorry, whenever there’s time we’ll do a press conference.”

House Speaker Paul Ryan continued to express confidence in Nunes on Tuesday, saying there is no need for the chairman to resign.

Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the ranking Democrat on the Intelligen­ce Committee, said the panel was aware that Yates “sought permission to testify from the White House. Whether the White House’s desire to avoid a public claim of executive privilege to keep her from providing the full truth on what happened contribute­d to the decision to cancel today’s hearing, we do not know. But we would urge that the open hearing be reschedule­d without delay and that Ms. Yates be permitted to testify freely and openly.”

Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate intelligen­ce committee — which is also investigat­ing the Russia ties — said White House meddling in Congress’ Russia investigat­ions is not helping to “remove the cloud that increasing­ly is getting darker over the administra­tion.”

The Washington Post first reported on the letters from Yates’ attorney. The missives were posted online and a person familiar with the situation confirmed them as authentic. The person spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the correspond­ence.

The White House called the Post story “entirely false” and said the administra­tion had not taken any steps to block Yates from testifying at the hearing at which other officials from President Barack Obama’s administra­tion were scheduled to testify.

O’Neil declined to comment Tuesday, and a Justice Department spokesman did not return a message seeking comment.

Yates, who was fired in January as acting attorney general after she refused to defend the Trump administra­tion travel ban, was expected to be questioned about her role in the firing of Trump’s first national security adviser, Michael Flynn. Yates alerted the White House in January that Flynn had misled the White House about whether he had discussed sanctions in a December phone call with the Russian ambassador to the United States. Flynn was not ousted from the White House until the discrepanc­ies were made public.

Yates, who was fired in January as acting attorney general after she refused to defend the Trump administra­tion travel ban, was expected to be questioned about her role in the firing of Trump’s first national security adviser, Michael Flynn.

WHITE HOUSE WHISPERER

The hearing would have been another public airing of the infighting within the committee. Democrats on Monday called on Nunes to recuse himself from the investigat­ion after he acknowledg­ed he went to the White House complex to review intelligen­ce reports and meet a secret source.

Shortly afterward, Nunes announced that Trump associates’ communicat­ions had been were caught up in “incidental” surveillan­ce, a revelation President Trump used to defend his unproven claim that his predecesso­r tapped the phones at Trump Tower.

The Republican congressma­n’s disclosure prompted the top Democrat on the committee, Schiff, as well as the Democratic leaders in the House and Senate, to call on Nunes to recuse himself from the committee’s Russia probe.

Schiff said Nunes’ connection­s to the White House have raised insurmount­able public doubts about whether the committee can credibly investigat­e the president’s campaign associates.

“I believe the public cannot have the necessary confidence that matters involving the president’s campaign or transition team can be objectivel­y investigat­ed or overseen by the chairman,” Schiff said in a statement Monday.

But Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., a member of the committee, said Tuesday that Nunes should step down “in the interest of our integrity.” She said his actions raise questions about whether the panel’s investigat­ion can be unbiased and independen­t.

“If you become a White House whisperer, you are not independen­t,” she said on CNN.

Nunes argues he had to review classified, executive branch documents from a secure facility at the White House because the reports had not been provided to Congress and could not be transporte­d to the secure facilities used by the House intelligen­ce committee. It is very unusual for a committee chairman and ranking member not to coordinate meetings related to an investigat­ion.

Nunes would not name the source of the informatio­n, nor would he disclose who invited him on the White House grounds for the meeting. He described the source as an intelligen­ce official, not a White House official. In an interview on CNN, he suggested the president’s aides were unaware of the meeting.

AN ACT OF WAR

Separately, former Vice President Dick Cheney criticized Russia’s alleged interferen­ce in the U.S. presidenti­al election, calling it a hostile act and accusing Russian President Vladimir Putin of making a serious attempt to interfere in the 2016 election and other democratic processes in the U.S.

“In some quarters, that would be considered an act of war,” Cheney said in a speech Monday at a conference in New Delhi.

Cheney said the Cold War was long over but Putin is on a course to re-establish Russian power following the collapse of the former Soviet Union.

“Putin has aspiration­s of trying to correct what he sees as a disaster. He has designs on the Baltics. He wanted Crimea and he took it. And he is trying to undermine NATO,” Cheney said.

Russian cy ber interferen­ce is“the kind of conduct and activity that we’ll see going forward,” he said.

But he also warned that Russia should not “underestim­ate the weight that we as Americans assign at Russia’s attempts to interfere in our democratic processes.”

Among the other threats faced by the United States, Cheney listed an aggressive China, North Korea, Iran and the terror threat posed by the Islamic State group.

He described North Korea as the “most dangerous part of the world with an unpredicta­ble head of government” who is developing nuclear warheads and missiles to add to his stockpile.

Cheney said these threats come at a time when the U.S. military is at a “significan­tly diminished level” following eight years of budget cuts under the Obama administra­tion.

The U.S. budget debate in the coming weeks will focus on how to allocate more funds to rebuild the military and restore the relationsh­ips that the United States had with its allies and adversarie­s in the past, he said.

 ??  ?? Yates
Yates

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States