Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Two cities order medical-pot moratorium­s

Temporary business bans in Siloam Springs, Hot Springs raise legal questions

- ERIC BESSON CONNECT WITH US ON FACEBOOK facebook.com/ nwademgaz

Two Arkansas cities have imposed months-long bans on medical-marijuana facilities, a test of local control as prospectiv­e growers and sellers prepare to vie for state licenses beginning June 30.

Siloam Springs’ Board of Directors on Tuesday adopted a 180-day moratorium on medical-pot businesses with a unanimous vote that came two weeks after Hot Springs city directors passed a similarly worded 90-day ban.

The cities’ decisions to not offer local business licenses to dispensari­es and cultivatio­n facilities could reverberat­e for longer than their bans because potential businesses have just 90 days to apply for a limited number of state licenses. Siloam Springs’ moratorium would extend well beyond the state’s Sept. 18 deadline to submit applicatio­ns.

“That really takes that whole city out of contention,

doesn’t it,” Storm Nolan, co-founder of the Arkansas Cannabis Industry Associatio­n, said of the Northwest Arkansas border city.

The voter-approved Arkansas Medical Marijuana Amendment says that local government­s cannot prohibit marijuana growers and distributo­rs from operating in their jurisdicti­on unless voters approve a ballot issue to keep them out.

“We are not prohibitin­g it,” Siloam Springs City Administra­tor Phillip Patterson said. “We have created a stay for a period of time. Cities have historical­ly had a right to put a stay on certain uses in order for the city to review its code, update its code or adopt its code.”

Mark Hayes, director of legal services for the Arkansas Municipal League, said both cities are his clients and that neither previously spoke with him about temporary bans. He said he learned of the action this week and couldn’t comment on whether their moratorium­s might violate the state constituti­on.

“I am in the process of consulting with them about this very thing,” Hayes said. “The only real comment that I can make is, generally speaking, moratorium­s in Arkansas law are not disfavored.”

David Couch, the Little Rock lawyer who sponsored the constituti­onal amendment, was out of the country and not available for a telephone interview Thursday but said in a statement that the amendment is “clear as a bell.”

“The amendment provides that by initiative people can prevent dispensari­es and cultivatio­n facilities,” Couch said. “The amendment also provides for zoning same as pharmacy so any other restrictio­ns are unconstitu­tional. … I’ll bring suit against any city or county that does not comply with [the] amendment.”

An estimated 30,000 Arkansans — or about 1 in 100 residents — are expected to apply for medical-marijuana registrati­on cards in the first year, said Meg Mirivel, public informatio­n officer for the Arkansas Department of Health, which will issue cards to qualifying patients in exchange for a $50 fee and a doctor’s note.

The Medical Marijuana Commission will license up to 32 dispensari­es in Arkansas — as many as four in each of eight geographic regions — and up to five growing facilities across the state.

Although Hot Springs and Siloam Springs have temporary bans on businesses, their residents can obtain medical-marijuana cards and buy cannabis outside of city limits.

Language in both moratorium­s say state rules and regulation­s about dispensari­es and cultivatio­n facilities were not yet finalized, though that was not the case for the Siloam Springs resolution.

State Department of Finance and Administra­tion spokesman Jake Bleed said the rules were finalized June 16, four days before the city board passed the measure. Emergency rules were in place since May 5, Bleed said.

“Our rules are final,” Bleed said, noting that doesn’t mean they can’t be changed. “We could go through rule-making process again in the future.”

Generally, two laws govern where dispensari­es and cultivatio­n facilities can function. One requires a buffer zone around schools and churches. The other bans cities from imposing stricter placement requiremen­ts on medical-marijuana facilities than they do on traditiona­l pharmacies.

Siloam Springs and Hot Springs are the only Arkansas cities and towns known to issue moratorium­s, Hayes of the Municipal League said.

Siloam Springs’ Patterson said he didn’t want to comment on what open questions he had about the rules because he hadn’t read the finalized version.

“I have looked at the published versions, yes, but I will reserve any comment [until the final rules are published],” Patterson said, adding that the city would need time after the rules were finalized to determine whether and how to amend its land-use law.

Section 14 of the constituti­onal amendment does not prohibit cities “from creating reasonable zoning regulation­s applicable to dispensari­es or cultivatio­n facilities,” as long as the regulation­s are the same as those in place for licensed retail pharmacies.

However, it says, “this section does not allow a city, incorporat­ed

town, or county to prohibit the operation of dispensari­es or cultivatio­n facilities in the city, incorporat­ed town, or county unless such a prohibitio­n is approved at an election. …”

Of 1.1 million voters statewide in November, 53 percent supported amending the state constituti­on to allow medical use of marijuana.

Siloam Springs, which abuts the Oklahoma state line and is home to 16,000 residents, narrowly opposed the initiative, with 2,742 voters against (52 percent) and 2,514 in favor, City Attorney Jay Williams said in a report to city directors.

The city’s resolution says that operators who acquire state Medical Marijuana Commission licenses to operate in Siloam Springs will not be grandfathe­red into current zoning restrictio­ns.

“Any person who purchases, erects or maintains any marijuana or marijuana-related activity during the regulatory exclusion will do so understand­ing the risk of being subject to enforcemen­t,” the resolution says. “Cultivatio­n and/or … distributi­on prior to the moratorium’s expiration … will neither acquire ‘nonconform­ing’ nor ‘grandfathe­r’ status.”

Hot Springs, home to nearly 36,000 residents, anchors Garland County, where 53 percent of about 40,000 voters supported the initiative.

A Hot Springs spokesman said City Attorney Brian Albright recommende­d the moratorium, which city directors unanimousl­y passed by ordinance. Albright, who was at a conference Thursday, did not respond to an email seeking comment.

Siloam Springs City Director Brad Burns, who supports medical marijuana, voted in favor of the moratorium. He likened the action to similar temporary bans on breweries after the city transition­ed from “dry” to “wet” and a moratorium on mobile homes the city also passed Tuesday.

Burns said he expects the city’s residents will propose a referendum to ban marijuana business in early 2018.

“Even though I believe in medical cannabis and the benefits of it, we need to figure out the regulation,” Burns said. “At the end of the day, I work for the citizen. I’ve got to represent the collective. I’m not going to sit here and beat on a dead drum.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States