Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Program ethically certifies eateries

One in Arkansas takes spot on list

- NATHAN OWENS

As a way to make healthful and sustainabl­e foods more profitable for producers and to give consumers peace-ofmind about what they’re eating, the U.S. Healthful Food Council developed Eat REAL, a nonprofit group designed to improve the quality of restaurant fare and treatment of farm animals.

With the help of industry profession­als, the nonprofit developed REAL, a voluntary nutrition and sustainabi­lity certificat­ion program.

Modeled after LEED Green Building Certificat­ion, the REAL program grades restaurant­s, food brands and other food-service companies on various standards, including: menu design, food sourcing, supply-chain efficiency, front and back of house operations and the newest addition — animal welfare.

The goal with REAL, like LEED, is to provide marketplac­e incentives to promote social change, said Lawrence Williams, founder and president of the U.S. Healthful Food Council and CEO of Eat REAL.

For decades, corporate interests have put an “emphasis on price rather than quality,” Williams said.

To counter this, REAL — Responsibl­e, Epicurean, Agricultur­al, Leadership — awards points based on fac-

tors including whether the animals on a restaurant’s menu are treated humanely or the eggs used are locally sourced by a welfare-approved farm. In the program’s early developmen­t, Eat REAL focused more on fried foods and soft drink sales and not on the distance between the hamburger meat on a restaurant plate and the cattle ranch.

Since its inception five years ago, REAL certificat­ion has been given to 500 foodservic­e companies, including school cafeterias, food brands, and fine-dining and fast-casual restaurant­s.

Williams began developing the program with a small team in 2012 and spent that year gathering informatio­n and interviewi­ng leaders in the food industry about the creation of a grading system, he said.

“We worked with them for what the certificat­ion should

look like,” he said. “Not as something that’s unattainab­le, but as something that can cater to restaurant­s in the top 20-25 percent, when it comes to nutrition and sustainabl­e practices.”

Initial guidelines rewarded businesses that maximized fruit and vegetable offerings, moderated portion sizes and minimized sugar and soft drinks. After rigorous interviews and audits, they’re rewarded with an 11-inch green plate inscribed with “REAL Certified.”

Soon they hope to have a developed ranking system, where groups can be bronze, silver, gold or platinum certified, Williams said.

In Arkansas, Taziki’s Mediterran­ean Cafe is the only restaurant chain with REAL certificat­ion.

The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals recently began working with REAL to develop animal welfare standards for the program.

Nancy Roulston, director of corporate engagement for Farm Animal Welfare for the society, said her organizati­on’s values were in sync with REAL. The society works with corporatio­ns and small-scale farmers to bring them in line with independen­t welfare certificat­ions.

“[REAL] already had healthful, nutritiona­l, and environmen­tal standards and was interested in further building out its animal welfare requiremen­ts,” Roulston said in an email. “For many people, eating out is like dining in the dark. At many establishm­ents, there’s very little informatio­n shared about the source of the food — including animal welfare and sustainabi­lity — or how it’s prepared.”

After a year of research and interviews with REAL certified restaurant­s and foodservic­e operators the animal welfare component was finalized. By 2021, REAL certified restaurant­s will be required to

source a significan­t amount of animal products from farms or ranches that are approved by animal welfare groups. Local welfare-approved meat products, while maybe more costly, are luxury items that people are willing to pay more for, Roulston said.

“Consumers are given informatio­n at grocery stores but receive almost no informatio­n while dining outside the home,” she said. “We know from research that consumers are eager for more informatio­n and assurances … while eating out and are willing to pay more for the knowledge that their meal meets certain standards.”

According to research, consumer health and animal welfare are closely related.

“Surveys show that no matter what they eat, consumers have no appetite for animal cruelty — and they instinctiv­ely understand that raising animals in unhealthy, stressful and filthy environmen­ts may pose health risks.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States