Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Understand­ing Elaine

- Senior Editor Rex Nelson’s column appears regularly in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. He’s also the author of the Southern Fried blog at rexnelsons­outhernfri­ed.com.

Elaine is one of those places that’s out of sight and out of mind for most Arkansans. The small town in Phillips County has seen its population decline from 1,210 in 1970 to 636 in the 2010 census. This area once was part of the vast network of streams, swamps and bottomland hardwoods that covered the Arkansas Delta. For the past century, the economy has been driven by row-crop agricultur­e.

“When Arkansas became a state in 1836, the area of present-day Elaine was still swampland,” Steven Teske writes in the Encycloped­ia of Arkansas History & Culture. “It was designated as such by the Swamp and Overflow Act, passed by the U.S. Congress in 1850. Silas Craig and John Martin purchased Phillips County land from the state of Arkansas under the provisions of that act, and the land passed through several owners—including the state of Arkansas a second time due to unpaid taxes—but was only slightly developed. …

“Around 1892, state geologist John Casper Branner predicted to Fort Smith investor Harry Kelley that the swampland of Phillips County would become the richest part of the state. This prediction noted that silt from river flooding created fertile farmland through the area. Branner said that three things were needed to develop the land— effective flood control through the building of levees, railroad transporta­tion and clearing of the timber. Beginning in 1892, Kelley purchased land in the promising area. Eventually he came to own—alone or through partners—about 35,000 acres.” As the timber was harvested, the Howe Lumber Co., Chicago Mill & Lumber Co., New Madrid Hoop Co. and Acme Cooperage Co. became major employers.

In 1919, an event occurred that should have put Elaine in the history books forever. The Progressiv­e Farmers & Household Union was holding meetings across the Delta in an attempt to obtain better prices for the cotton grown by tenant farmers. There was a Sept. 30 shooting at a meeting in a community three miles north of Elaine known as Hoop Spur. A white security officer for the Missouri-Pacific Railroad was killed, and a sheriff’s deputy was injured. Rumors spread that blacks were planning a violent uprising against white plantation owners. Whites from Helena and even farther away (some came from Mississipp­i) took up arms. A number of blacks were killed in the days that followed. Some accounts say the death toll reached into the hundreds.

Gov. Charles Brough sent 500 soldiers to Phillips County from Camp Pike in North Little Rock. Once the violence ended, 77 blacks were tried and sentenced for various crimes. No whites were sentenced. It was the deadliest racial confrontat­ion in Arkansas history and perhaps the bloodiest racial conflict in U.S. history.

For decades, however, it wasn’t talked about in Arkansas. Few Arkansans had heard about the carnage until 2001 when the University of Arkansas Press published a book by Grif Stockley titled Blood in Their Eyes: The Elaine Race Massacres of 1919. Now, 16 years following the publicatio­n of Stockley’s well-researched book, Arkansans again need to be educated about what happened in 1919.

On a Thursday last month, those interested in learning about what Stockley refers to as the Elaine Massacre filled the Ron Robinson Theater in downtown Little Rock to hear about a planned documentar­y by filmmakers Natalie Zimmerman and Michael Wilson to be titled Elaine. The event was promoted as a “screening of clips,” though only a short trailer was shown. Most of the hour consisted of a panel discussion. Wilson talked about the current Delta while using pejorative terms such as “industrial farming” and made a plea for radical, totally unrealisti­c modern efforts such as reparation­s.

Therein lies the problem. People need to be educated about the atrocities that occurred. But if the documentar­y enters the realm of 21st century leftist politics, it will turn off those who most need to see it. In an era of deep political divisions, such an approach will further divide rather than enlighten.

The Red Echo Group and Wilson’s Social Satisfacti­on Studio are trying to raise $60,000 to finish the film. Their literature says they want to bring “national and internatio­nal awareness to the conflict in Elaine— it’s [sic] race, class and labor dimensions, and the true scope and legacy of the subsequent massacre.”

The summer of 1919 was marked by racial conflicts across the country in cities from Washington to Chicago.

Stockley writes: “With labor conflicts escalating through the country at the end of World War I, government and business interprete­d the demands of labor increasing­ly as the work of foreign ideologies, such as Bolshevism, that threatened the foundation of the American economy. Thrown into the highly combustibl­e mix was the return to the United States of black soldiers who often exhibited a less submissive attitude within the Jim Crow society around then. Unions such as the Progressiv­e Farmers represente­d a threat not only to the tenet of white supremacy but also to the basic concepts of capitalism. Although the United States was on the winning side of World War I, supporters of American capitalism found in communism a new menace to their security.”

Arkansans must know what happened at Elaine in the fall of 1919. If the tone of last month’s comments at the Ron Robinson Theater are an indication of where the current film is headed, though, it will fall short of its educationa­l goals. That’s unfortunat­e.

 ?? Rex Nelson ??
Rex Nelson

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States