Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

FBI raided, seized files from Manafort’s home

- Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Carol D. Leonnig, Tom Hamburger, Rosalind S. Helderman, Philip Rucker, Matt Zapotosky and Julie Tate of The Washington Post; by Michael S. Schmidt and Adam Goldman of The New York Times; by Chad Day and Er

FBI agents raided the Alexandria, Va., home of President Donald Trump’s former campaign manager late last month, using a warrant to search for tax documents and foreign banking records, according to people familiar with the special counsel investigat­ion into Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

Federal agents appeared at Paul Manafort’s home without warning in the predawn hours of July 26, the day after he met voluntaril­y with the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee staff.

The search warrant was wide-ranging, and FBI agents working with special counsel Robert Mueller left the home with various records.

The use of a search warrant indicates that law enforcemen­t officials have convinced a judge that there is probable cause to believe a crime may have been committed. The raid, which comes as Manafort has been cooperatin­g with congressio­nal investigat­ors and has

turned over hundreds of pages of documents, could indicate that law enforcemen­t authoritie­s were looking for records beyond what Manafort has provided, according to some analysts.

Investigat­ors in the Russia inquiry have previously sought documents with subpoenas, which are less intrusive and confrontat­ional than a search warrant. With a warrant, agents can inspect a physical location and seize any useful informatio­n.

Jason Maloni, a spokesman for Manafort, confirmed that FBI agents executed a warrant at one of the political consultant’s homes. He also reiterated that Manafort has “consistent­ly cooperated with law enforcemen­t and other serious inquiries and did so on this occasion as well.”

Josh Stueve, a spokesman for Mueller, declined to comment, as did Reginald Brown, an attorney for Manafort.

U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and a former U.S. attorney, called the search “a significan­t and even stunning developmen­t,” noting that such raids are generally reserved for “the most serious criminal investigat­ions dealing with uncooperat­ive or untrusted potential targets.”

Jacob Frenkel, a former federal prosecutor, said the raid “adds a shock and awe enforcemen­t component to what until now has followed a natural path for a white-collar

investigat­ion.”

“More so than anything else we’ve seen so far, it really does send a powerful law enforcemen­t message when the search warrant is used. … That message is that the special counsel team will use all criminal investigat­ive tools available to advance the investigat­ion as quickly and as comprehens­ively as possible,” Frenkel said.

Word of the raid is the latest revelation about Mueller’s investigat­ion, which had been operating in relative secrecy compared with numerous congressio­nal probes looking at the election.

In recent days, it’s become clear that in his investigat­ion, former FBI Director Mueller is using a grand jury in Washington in addition to one in the Eastern District of Virginia, where investigat­ors also have been looking into former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn.

Manafort, a longtime political operative who was once a business partner of Trump confidante Roger Stone, was hired to profession­alize the Trump campaign at the recommenda­tion of another Trump friend, Tom Barrack, an internatio­nal real estate investor.

As a political consultant, Manafort traveled the world, at times offering advice to despots and dictators.

Until now, it was known only that Manafort was under investigat­ion for business dealings with Trump’s son-inlaw, his role in a 2016 meeting between Trump campaign officials and the Russians, and whether his work for the Ukrainian government violated

the Foreign Agents Registrati­on Act.

But the search warrant for the tax and foreign banking records suggests that investigat­ors are looking at criminal charges related to the federal Bank Secrecy Act, which requires Americans to report their foreign banking accounts. The FBI typically seeks such records when investigat­ing such violations.

Manafort’s allies have said they fear that Mueller hopes to build a case against Manafort unrelated to the 2016 campaign, in hopes that the former campaign operative will provide informatio­n against others in Trump’s inner circle in exchange for lessening his own legal exposure.

Manafort has been a subject of a longstandi­ng FBI investigat­ion into his dealings in Ukraine and work for the country’s former president, Viktor Yanukovych. That investigat­ion has been incorporat­ed into the Russia probe.

The government rarely prosecutes cases related to the Foreign Agents Registrati­on Act, and Manafort’s consulting firm retroactiv­ely filed forms with the Justice Department last month to be in compliance with the act.

The June 2016 meeting — which Manafort attended with Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and Donald Trump Jr. — is a key focus of the probes into Russian meddling. The meeting, held at Trump Tower in New York, was described to Trump Jr. in emails as part of a Russian government effort to help the Trump campaign by passing along informatio­n that could be used against Democrat Hillary Clinton. Manafort

was named Trump’s campaign manager a few days after the meeting.

During his Senate Intelligen­ce Committee interview, Manafort provided his recollecti­on of the meeting and turned over contempora­neous notes he took during the gathering. The interview was confined to that meeting.

Manafort has turned over other documents to the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee, as well as about 400 pages of records to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Meanwhile, the judiciary committee said it recently received about 250 pages of documents from Trump Jr. and about 20,000 pages from Manafort and the Trump campaign.

The content of those documents was not immediatel­y clear. Committee spokesman George Hartmann said Tuesday that it received the Manafort and Trump campaign documents on Aug. 2 and the records from Trump Jr. on Friday.

Fusion GPS, a company the judiciary committee says has been linked to an unverified dossier detailing unsubstant­iated allegation­s regarding Trump’s activities in Russia, and the company’s chief executive officer, Glenn Simpson, have yet to turn over any requested documents, Hartmann said.

The committee has said it wants to investigat­e Fusion GPS’ role in the creation of the dossier. Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, told reporters last week that he wants to know if Russians paid for the dossier.

The committee had asked

for all records regarding any attempts or interest in obtaining informatio­n about Clinton from Russian government or affiliated sources, including the June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower.

Judiciary committee leaders have also been in talks with Trump Jr. and Manafort about private interviews. The committee initially called for them to testify publicly, but lawmakers have since said they were negotiatin­g the terms of their appearance­s.

As part of the FBI probe, agents also have been asking witnesses since the spring about $530,000 worth of lobbying and investigat­ive work carried out by Flynn’s firm, Flynn Intel Group, according to a person familiar with the investigat­ion. That work sought the extraditio­n of an exiled Turkish cleric living in the U.S. Through his attorney, Flynn has declined to comment on the investigat­ion.

The person, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive details of the investigat­ion, said FBI agents have also been asking about Flynn’s business partner, Bijan Kian, who served during the Trump presidenti­al transition. Kian has not responded to multiple attempts to contact him over several months.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States