Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Lost down the river

Organizati­on calls on Tyson to do more

- Fran Alexander Fran Alexander is a Fayettevil­le resident with a longstandi­ng interest in the environmen­t and an opinion on almost anything else. Email her at fran@deane-alexander.com.

If we follow the Mississipp­i River’s watershed to its terminus, we reach the Gulf of Mexico. Cradled by five states, this water has long suffered body blows from humankind. Oil spills, pipeline breaks, chemical leaks, wetland depletion, wildlife habitat destructio­n, shipping waste and traffic, and runoff from sewers, parking lots, golf courses, industries, lawns, farms and the crunched remains of hurricane-demolished cities have all happened to the Gulf.

This, the nation’s third coastline, and once one of the most diverse ecosystems on earth, has for decades been used as an out-of-sight dumping ground, even for sea burial of spent and surplus bombs, chemical weapons, ships and munitions. In addition, a notation on a 2010 National Geographic map reads, “The Gulf holds more than 50,000 wells and some 42,000 miles of pipelines.” Also, on top of the water are about 4,000 off-shore drilling platforms (2010 data).

Each summer the National Oceanic and Atmospheri­c Administra­tion sends scientists into the Gulf’s water, literally, to measure its “dead zone.” This year the zone was the largest yet, covering 8,776 square miles, an area about the size of New Jersey. These waters are considered dead because decomposin­g algae masses consume the oxygen needed for swimming marine life, and smother sea-bottom critters that fish feed upon.

It is nutrient pollution, mostly nitrogen and phosphorus used as fertilizer, that creates miles of blooming algae choking the life out of the water. Backtracki­ng up the river to those nutrient sources leads to the nation’s heartland, the country’s breadbaske­t and meat market. Here is where corn, soy and other grains are grown to feed most of the chickens, hogs and cattle consumed by Americans. And it is in Arkansas where the country’s largest meat company, producing one out of every five pounds of meat consumed in the United States, was founded and run by the Tyson family.

Examinatio­n of Tyson’s sustainabi­lity reports is an impressive experience. If the programs and implementa­tion of intentions explained in these reports are not window-dressing, the company seems to have a sincere grasp of what sustainabi­lity, efficiency, conservati­on and awareness all mean, at least to their immediate operations. If Tyson Foods has an environmen­tal Achilles heel, however, it seems to be in its feed supply chain of independen­t farms. At least this is the opinion of Mighty Earth, a global environmen­tal campaign organizati­on that works to protect forests, conserve oceans and address climate change.

Their informatio­nal materials state, “To identify the companies responsibl­e, the investigat­ion [has mapped] the supply chains of the top meat and feed companies, and overlays it with data showing elevated nitrate concentrat­ions in waterways that are experienci­ng high levels of fertilizer pollution. The report also mapped where these supply chains are driving destructio­n of natural grasslands, including native prairies, putting new regions at risk for fertilizer pollution. Tyson Foods stood out for its expansive footprint in all the regions suffering the worst pollution impacts from industrial meat and feed production.”

For their part, Tyson Foods responded, “We share this group’s concern about the environmen­t, but disagree with its misleading characteri­zation of our company. Tyson Foods is not in the business of raising the crops, and we own very few livestock farms.”

In 2013, Tyson paid more than 11,000 farmers over $15.4 billion for meat animals, which were processed in their plants in 18 states. It is this vast scale and concentrat­ion of influence where the company could affect supply-chain farming practices that has been the basis for Mighty Earth’s, “NWA ‘Clean It Up, Tyson’ Campaign,” which is also its Facebook moniker. Promoting cover crop practices to reduce erosion, adding extensive landscapin­g buffers to block run-off, optimizing fertilizer applicatio­n, and ceasing the clearance of native prairie ecosystems are a few of the practices the organizati­on is urging the company to promote in order to cut nutrient and topsoil loss on a scale commensura­te with their industry’s impact.

To present their petitions to Tyson about these issues, the Mighty Earth campaign plans to shuttle anyone wishing to join them from the Liquor World parking lot in Fayettevil­le at 9 a.m. on Nov. 30 to a gathering outside Tyson headquarte­rs in Springdale. Such efforts can sometimes make activists feel like David facing off with Goliath, but public awareness must start somewhere. Walmart and other companies have had major impacts on the requiremen­ts they place on their suppliers. Mighty Earth evidently believes similar business practices from Tyson could have a major effect on decreasing nutrient-caused dead zones in our Gulf of Mexico.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States