Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
Shutdown off as Congress OKs stopgap
Government spending lasts until Dec. 22; battle to go on
WASHINGTON — Congress passed a short-term spending bill Thursday, avoiding a partial government shutdown in the coming days but setting up another spending battle later this month.
The measure to extend government funding until Dec. 22 passed the House and Senate by comfortable margins. President Donald Trump indicated he will sign the stopgap deal, averting a partial government shutdown that had been set to take effect at 12:01 a.m. Saturday.
Congressional leaders of both parties went to the White House on Thursday afternoon to begin talks with Trump on a long-term spending pact.
“We’re all here today as a very friendly, well-unified group, well-knit-together group of people,” Trump said at the top of the Oval Office meeting. “We hope that we’re going to make some great progress for our country. I think that will happen, and we’ll appreciate it very much.”
But there are obstacles to any deal. Trump himself cast doubt Wednesday, telling reporters that Democrats “want to have illegal immigrants pouring into our country, bringing with them crime, tremendous amounts of crime.” A shutdown over the issue, he said, “could happen.”
The short-term deal, known as a continuing resolution, passed in part because it maintained the status quo on government spending levels and policies. Both parties are preparing for a spending and policy fight as they eye a longer-term deal.
The chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, a group of hard-line conservatives who have bucked GOP leaders on past government spending bills, warned that
any bipartisan deal on spending risked a Republican revolt later this month.
“It takes two bodies to put something into law, and the president’s agreement to a caps deal does not mean that it is fiscally the best thing for the country,” said Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., referring to the deal to maintain current spending levels. “I want to avoid a headline that says President Trump’s administration just passed the highest spending levels in U.S. history.”
The statement cast a pall over the high-stakes spending talks Thursday, which were expected to be an initial step in a weekslong dance over funding the government and resolving several other partisan standoffs.
Republicans have majorities in both chambers of Congress, but they cannot pass spending bills alone. In the Senate, a 60-vote supermajority is required to pass most major legislation, and Republicans control 52 seats. That means negotiating with Democrats, who have pushed to maintain their own domestic spending priorities.
Capitol Hill’s top Democrats, Sen. Charles Schumer of New York and Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, in a statement called Thursday’s meeting productive and ticked off a roster of Democratic goals, including domestic spending increases, funding for veterans, money to battle opioid abuse, and action on immigration and health care.
Pelosi sent mixed signals on how far Democrats would go to secure their priorities, saying that on one hand “Democrats are not willing to shut government down” but on the other they “will not leave” Washington for the holidays without a fix for those illegal aliens who were granted protection under the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.
Spokesmen for House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said GOP leaders at the meeting “stressed the need to address border security, interior enforcement and other parts of our broken immigration system,” adding that the tricky immigration issue “should be a separate process and not used to hold hostage funding for our men and women in uniform.”
LEVERAGE ON DEFENSE
The main source of the Democrats’ leverage is the GOP’s desire to increase military spending to more than $600 billion in 2018.
Under a 10-year budget deal struck in 2011, Congress may appropriate a maximum of $549 billion for defense programs and $516 billion for nondefense programs next year. Republican leaders have floated a $54 billion boost in defense next year and a $37 billion boost in nondefense spending; Democrats have thus far demanded equivalent increases for both.
“We need a strong national defense, but we also need a strong domestic budget,” Pelosi said Thursday.
Joining the White House meeting Thursday were Vice President Mike Pence, Defense Secretary James Mattis and White House budget director Mick Mulvaney.
Mattis and Mulvaney are seen on Capitol Hill as the pivotal figures in an internal clash within the Trump administration over whether to cut a deal with Democrats to increase domestic spending in exchange for securing an increase in the military budget. Mattis has pushed internally to work with Democrats to secure a bigger military budget, while Mulvaney has argued for pursuing a harder line.
The stopgap bill does not change existing spending levels, and defense hawks have resisted calls to pass temporary bills into the new year, arguing that the military needs a boost.
But conservatives see it differently: They want to provoke a confrontation with Democrats and break a cycle of bipartisan deals that has led both military and nondefense discretionary spending to rise in lockstep. They are also wary of a year-end spending bill becoming a legislative “Christmas tree” that could include relief for the deferred-action participants and other Democratic priorities.
That, Meadows said, would be “not only problematic, but it will be met with such resistance that we haven’t seen on the Hill for many, many years.”
Meadows said he is pushing Ryan to “do short-term spending until we break the defense-nondefense connection.” He said GOP leaders have expressed openness to drafting a funding bill later this month that funds the military through the remainder of the fiscal year while leaving the remainder of the federal bureaucracy subject to a weekslong extension.
Ryan declined Thursday to confirm any such deal; Pelosi said it would be a nonstarter for Democrats. Were the House to pass such a bill, the Senate would likely send back a bipartisan measure that would include provisions that conservatives dislike. But that could win votes from House Democrats, sidelining the conservatives.
“We’re going to take the speaker at his word that he’s going to fight,” Meadows said, adding, “If all we do is pass a bill and watch the Senate change it, and then agree to higher spending, that is not a fight.”
In a moment of bipartisanship, money was made available in the two-week spending bill to several states that are running out of funds for the Children’s Health Insurance Program. That widely popular program provides medical care to more than 8 million children.
The children’s health care issue is among the year-end items where negotiations have gone positively, and aides say a long-term agreement is nearly in hand.
The bill also extends funding for the National Flood Insurance Program to the end of this year.
All four House members from Arkansas voted for the stopgap measure, but Rep. Steve Womack said he was “disappointed” in the way Congress has handled the budget process.
“I prefer we handle funding the government separate from other contentious issues, as originally intended, but the short-term [continuing resolution] is necessary for the House to reach an all-important deal on spending levels, particularly for our nation’s defense,” the Republican from Rogers said in a statement. “I am hopeful this resolution will give Congress time to establish a path forward to fund the government and avoid a shutdown.”
In a statement, French Hill, a Republican from Little Rock, said the House isn’t to blame for the budgetary problems.
“We’ve already done our job in the House by passing all twelve government funding bills this year, but the Senate hasn’t done their job by passing any of them,” he wrote. “I have said it many times and I will say it again, Continuing Resolutions are no way to govern.”