Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Amtrak cleanup, investigat­ion

Investigat­ors said to look into train engineer’s ‘awareness’

- Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Michael Balsamo, Haven Daley, Phuong Le, Sally Ho, Michael Sisak and Manuel Valdes of The Associated Press and by Kirk Johnson and Richard Perez-Pena of The New York Times.

Two damaged Amtrak cars sit on trailers Tuesday after being removed from the scene of Monday’s derailment in DuPont, Wash. Investigat­ors were checking whether the engineer was distracted by a trainee when the train ran off the rails and sent cars plummeting onto Interstate 5, killing three people and injuring dozens.

DUPONT, Wash. — Investigat­ors are looking into whether the Amtrak engineer whose speeding train plunged off an overpass, killing at least three people, was distracted by the presence of an employee-in-training next to him in the locomotive, a federal official said Tuesday.

The official, who was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity, said investigat­ors want to know whether the engineer lost “situationa­l awareness” because of the second person in the cab.

The train was hurtling at 80 mph in a 30 mph zone Monday morning when it ran off the rails along a curve south of Seattle, sending some of its cars plummeting onto an interstate below, National Transporta­tion Safety Board member Bella DinhZarr said late Monday, citing data from the locomotive’s event recorder.

Dinh-Zarr said it is not yet known what caused the train to derail and too early to say why it was going so fast. She said investigat­ors will talk to the engineer and other crew members.

In previous wrecks, investigat­ors looked at whether the engineer was distracted or incapacita­ted. It is standard procedure in a crash investigat­ion to test the engineer for alcohol or drugs and check to see whether a cellphone was being used, something that is prohibited while the train is running.

The engineer, whose name was not released, was bleeding from the head after the crash, and his eyes were swollen shut, according to radio transmissi­ons from a crew member. The transmissi­ons mentioned a second person in the front of the train who was also hurt.

The train, with 85 passengers and crew members, was making the inaugural run along a fast new bypass route that was created by refurbishi­ng freight tracks alongside Interstate 5. The 15-mile, $180.7 million project was aimed at speeding up service by bypassing a route with a number of curves, single-track tunnels and freight traffic.

The train was headed from Seattle to Portland, Ore., and crashed near Tacoma, Wash. The accident closed the southbound lanes of I-5, which is the main north-south corridor through the region, and officials declined to say when they might reopen.

Positive train control — technology that can automatica­lly slow or stop a speeding train — wasn’t in use on that stretch of track. Track sensors and other positive-train-control components have been installed, but the system isn’t expected to be completed until the spring, transit officials said.

Regulators have been pressing railroads for years to install such technology, and some have done so, but the deadline has been extended repeatedly at the industry’s request and is now the end of 2018.

Dinh-Zarr said it is too soon to say whether positive train control would have prevented Monday’s accident.

The 7:34 a.m. accident left mangled train cars up on top of one another, with one hanging precarious­ly over the freeway. The screech and clang of metal were followed by silence, then screams, as the injured cried out to rescuers and motorists pulled over and rushed to help.

In addition to those killed, more than 70 people were injured, 10 of them seriously.

Two of the dead were identified as train buffs who belonged to the rail advocacy group All Aboard Washington and were excited to be on board for the inaugural run: Jim Hamre, a retired civil engineer with the state Transporta­tion Department, and Zack Willhoite, a customer service employee at a transit agency.

“It was just a given that they would be there,” said Lloyd Flem, a friend of the victims and the executive director of All Aboard Washington. “They had wanted to be on that very, very first run.”

In an interview Tuesday, Flem said he saw both men just a few days ago and they were eager to board the train early Monday.

On Tuesday morning, the scene of the crash, surrounded by police and emergency vehicles, began to look more like a constructi­on site than a disaster. In a heavy drizzle, cranes were moved in to lift the wrecked pieces of the train, while the crumpled remains of cars and trucks were loaded onto tractor-trailers to be taken away.

In 2015, an Amtrak train traveling at twice the 50 mph speed limit derailed along a sharp curve in Philadelph­ia, killing eight people. Investigat­ors concluded the engineer was distracted by reports over the radio of another train getting hit by a rock.

In September, a judge threw out charges of involuntar­y manslaught­er and reckless endangerme­nt against the engineer, saying the crash did not appear to rise to a crime. Prosecutor­s are trying to get the case reinstated.

Amtrak agreed to pay $265 million to settle claims filed by the victims and their families. It has also installed positive train control on all its track between Boston and Washington.

 ?? AP/ELAINE THOMPSON ??
AP/ELAINE THOMPSON
 ?? AP/ELAINE THOMPSON ?? A damaged Amtrak train car is lowered from an overpass at the scene of Monday’s deadly train crash onto Interstate 5 on Tuesday, in DuPont, Wash.
AP/ELAINE THOMPSON A damaged Amtrak train car is lowered from an overpass at the scene of Monday’s deadly train crash onto Interstate 5 on Tuesday, in DuPont, Wash.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States