Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

How Arkansas’ congressio­nal delegation voted

Here is how Arkansas’ U.S. senators and U.S. representa­tives voted on major roll call votes during the week that ended Friday. KEY: FOR AGAINST NOT VOTING PASSED DEFEATED

-

HOUSE

Extension of no-warrant

surveillan­ce program. Passed 256-164, a six-year extension (S139) of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act. The law passed after Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks is a key government tool for detecting and preventing foreign-based terrorist activity, but also a target of criticism that it imperils the privacy rights of innocent Americans.

The law gives agencies, including the National Security Agency and FBI, no-warrant access to commercial databases of foreigners’ voice and digital communicat­ions phone calls, emails, online chats, text messaging and social-media postings — that pass through wireless and landline facilities in the United States. If agencies use the databases to target Americans suspected of terrorist connection­s, they must obtain Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act court warrants based on probable cause. When the government inadverten­tly sweeps up innocent Americans’ communicat­ions, the informatio­n must be expunged or disregarde­d, although the law lacks a means for outsiders to see if that has occurred.

The Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act was enacted in 1978 to govern domestic collection of foreign intelligen­ce while protecting Americans’ civil liberties, and it has been amended several times to address post-9/11 terrorism threats. The law’s secretive Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Court, which issues blanket and specific warrants, and monitors government compliance with the law, is comprised of sitting federal judges who serve on a rotating basis.

Doug Collins, R-Ga., said: “This program allows the government to obtain the communicat­ion of foreigners outside the United States, including foreign terrorist threats. … It has allowed us to respond to threats to our country. … It cannot be used to target Americans, and it cannot be used to target individual­s located inside the United States.”

David Cicilline, D-R.I., said: “There is no more important responsibi­lity that we have than keeping the American people safe, but we have to do it in a way that is consistent with our values and our Constituti­on. This bill undermines our values of privacy and freedom from unreasonab­le searches and seizures.”

A yes vote was to send the bill to the Senate. Rick Crawford (R) French Hill (R) Steve Womack (R) Bruce Westerman (R)

Privacy rights in surveillan­ce law. Defeated 183-233, a measure aimed at safeguardi­ng Fourth Amendment privacy rights under the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act. The amendment to S139 (above) sought to protect innocent Americans whose voice and digital communicat­ions with foreigners are swept up in government collection­s of informatio­n on foreigners suspected of terrorist activity.

The amendment would have prohibited “backdoor searches” for informatio­n on Americans in commercial telecommun­ication databases without a specific Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act court warrant based on probable cause. It also would prohibit “reverse targeting,” no-warrant database searches aimed at foreign subjects that end up targeting Americans as well. In addition, the amendment would allow the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act law’s Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board to review all government foreign-intelligen­ce surveillan­ce programs, not just ones related to terrorism.

Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., said: “If you are going to search for the informatio­n of an American who has been collected in that database and it is not terrorism but a domestic criminal investigat­ion, get a warrant. Get a warrant. That is what the Fourth Amendment requires.”

Jim Costa, D-Calif., said: “Americans cherish and strongly want us to protect their privacy. We all agree on that, and I think this [underlying] bill threads the needle,” whereas this amendment “is an overreach in the wrong direction.” A yes vote was to adopt the amendment.

Crawford (R)

Hill (R)

Womack (R) Westerman (R) Limits on FBI searches. Defeated 189-227, a motion that would expand the types of FBI searches of commercial telecommun­ication databases that require specific search warrants under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act. The underlying bill (S139, above) requires the FBI to obtain Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act court warrants based on probable cause for searches targeting Americans in investigat­ions specifical­ly linked to national security and foreign intelligen­ce. This measure sought to require Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act court warrants for all FBI searches of databases to which the government has access under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act. Jim Himes, D-Conn., said the underlying bill “makes important and meaningful civil-liberties improvemen­ts over the status quo,” but the amendment is needed because “no bill is perfect.”

Doug Collins, R-Ga., said the bill already “forecloses the possibilit­y that FBI agents investigat­ing Americans for traditiona­l crimes would be able to use [Section] 702 informatio­n in such domestic investigat­ions.”

A yes vote was to further limit FBI powers under the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act to target Americans in probes unrelated to terrorist activity. Crawford (R)

Hill (R)

Womack (R) Westerman (R)

Labor rights on tribal

lands. Passed 239-173, a bill (S140) that would remove Indian reservatio­ns from the jurisdicti­on of the National Labor Relations Act on grounds that they are sovereign nations and therefore exempt from that New Deal-era workplace law. This would take away collective-bargaining rights and other federally guaranteed employment rights now available to 600,000 or more workers at casinos on reservatio­ns, at least three-fourths of whom are not tribal members. The National Labor Relations Board has applied the National Labor Relations Act to commercial enterprise­s on Indian reservatio­ns since 2004.

A yes vote was to send the bill to the Senate.

Crawford (R)

Hill (R)

Womack (R) Westerman (R)

SENATE

Extension on no-warrant

surveillan­ce program. Approved 68-27, to start legislativ­e action on a House-passed measure (S139, above) that would extend Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act through 2023, with debate and a final vote on the bill expected within days.

A yes vote was to advance the bill. John Boozman (R)

Tom Cotton (R)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States