Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Meddling probe indicts 13 Russians

Charges say scheme was to lift Trump, sow havoc

-

WASHINGTON — The special counsel investigat­ing Russia’s interferen­ce in the 2016 presidenti­al election charged 13 Russian citizens and three Russian organizati­ons Friday with trying to disrupt the U.S. political process, including efforts designed to boost the candidacy of Donald Trump and hurt that of his opponent, Hillary Clinton.

The indictment represents the first charges by the special counsel, Robert Mueller, for meddling in the 2016 presidenti­al election.

In a 37-page indictment filed in U.S. District Court, Mueller said the 13 individual­s have conspired since 2014 to violate laws that prohibit foreigners from spending money to influence federal elections in the United States.

The indictment charges that the foreigners posed as U.S. citizens, stole identities and otherwise engaged in fraud and deceit to influence the U.S. political process, including the 2016 presidenti­al race.

“The nature of the scheme was the defendants took extraordin­ary steps to make it appear that they were ordinary American political activists,” Rod Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general overseeing Mueller’s inquiry, said in a brief news conference Friday afternoon at the Justice Department.

Though the Russians are unlikely to be immediatel­y arrested, they are now wanted by the U.S. government, which will make it hard for them to travel or do business internatio­nally. All were charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States, three with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud and five with aggravated identity theft.

Trump emphasized in a tweet and a statement that the indictment­s accused neither him nor his campaign of wrongdoing, and said the partisan rancor that dominates politics made room for “bad actors, like Russia,” to sow discord.

“We must unite as Americans to protect the integrity of our democracy and our elections,” he said in the statement.

In the midafterno­on tweet, he wrote that Russia began its operation before he even announced his candidacy and that its efforts did not affect the election results. “The Trump campaign did nothing wrong — no collusion!” he wrote.

The collusion question, still unresolved, has been at the heart of Mueller’s investigat­ion, which before Friday had produced charges against four Trump associates. The U.S. intelligen­ce community has said the Russian interferen­ce included orchestrat­ing the hack of Democratic emails, and Mueller and his prosecutor­s have been assessing whether the campaign coordinate­d with Russia in any meddling.

The latest indictment does not focus on the hacking but instead centers on a social media effort aiming to cause confusion and discontent in the American political process.

The indictment lays out a highly sophistica­ted, well-funded, scheme designed in part to put Trump in the White House.

The Internet Research Agency, operating out of St. Petersburg, was described in the indictment as a hub for an intricate operation designed to reach millions of Americans to disrupt the political process in the United States. Its annual budget was millions of dollars; its stated goal was to “spread distrust toward the candidates and the political system in general.”

The accusation­s detail unpreceden­ted foreign attempts to influence the outcome of a U.S. election, including the manipulati­on of accounts at big U.S. companies like Facebook, Twitter, PayPal and Instagram. Those companies will continue to face pressure to clamp down on fraudulent accounts or risk a government crackdown from intelligen­ce officials who have warned that Russians are already engaged in influencin­g the 2018 midterm elections.

The goal of the Russian operation was “informatio­n warfare against the United States,” the indictment alleges. Some of the Russians, posing as Americans and working on what was dubbed “the Translator Project,” “communicat­ed with unwitting individual­s associated with the Trump campaign and other political activists.”

The group bought advertisem­ents on U.S. social media, created numerous Twitter accounts designed to appear as if they were U.S. groups or people, according to the indictment. One fake account, @ TEN_GOP account, attracted more than 100,000 online followers.

“Over time, these social media accounts became defendants’ means to reach significan­t numbers of Americans for purposes of interferin­g with the U.S. political system,” the indictment reads.

They communicat­ed with members of the campaign, volunteers, supporters and grass-roots workers, court papers show. Those individual­s — none of whom is named in the indictment — sometimes spread the Russian-created political messages through retweets, reposts and other means.

The Russians tracked the metrics of their effort in reports and budgeted for their efforts.

In September 2016, the group ordered one worker to “intensify criticizin­g Hillary Clinton” after a review found insufficie­nt anti-Clinton activity.

Several Russians traveled around the U.S. to gather intelligen­ce for their operation, posing as political and social activists. They visited at least eight states, court papers show, and worked with an unidentifi­ed American. That person advised them to focus their efforts on what they viewed as “purple” election battlegrou­nd states, including Colorado, Virginia and Florida, the indictment said.

They used clandestin­e methods to communicat­e and gather informatio­n, employing special cameras, “drop phones” and “evacuation scenarios” to ensure security.

The Russians set up Facebook and Instagram groups with names that targeted such issues as immigratio­n, religion and the Black Lives Matter movement. They also controlled numerous Twitter groups that appeared to be controlled by U.S. people, such as “Tennessee GOP.”

They spent thousands of dollars a month to buy advertisem­ents on social media platforms, while carefully tracking the size of U.S. audiences they reached, according to the indictment.

The indictment cites a series of political advertisem­ents paid for by the Russians, all of them against Clinton and in favor of Trump. “Hillary is a Satan, and her crimes and lies had proved just how evil she is,” one advertisem­ent created by the Russians stated.

After the election, the group organized both pro- and anti-Trump rallies, including a “Trump is NOT my President” rally in New York the week after the election and one in Charlotte, N.C., the following week.

The Russian organizati­on had settled on Trump as their favored candidate by at least April 2016 and began producing and purchasing ads promoting the reality-TV star to voters and “expressly opposing Clinton,” according to the indictment.

In June the defendants allegedly posed as grass-roots activists using the account @ March_for_Trump to contact a volunteer for the Trump campaign in New York. The volunteer agreed to provide signs for their “March for Trump” rally, according to the indictment. By August, the accused Russians were communicat­ing with unwitting Trump campaign staff members involved in community outreach to discuss their fraudulent “Florida Goes Trump” rallies.

Prosecutor­s also charged Yevgeniy Viktorivic­h Prigozhin, a Russian restaurate­ur and caterer widely known as “Putin’s chef” for hosting Russian President Vladimir Putin’s state dinners with foreign dignitarie­s, and two of his companies. The companies, Concord Catering and Concord Management and Consulting, have Russian government contracts. The special counsel alleges that they provided the financing for the Internet Research Agency’s operations.

“Americans are very impression­able people, they see what they want to see. I have great respect for them. I’m not at all upset that I ended up on this list. If they want to see the devil — let them see it,” Prigozhin told RIA Novosti.

While the indictment does not directly accuse the Russian government of running the operation, U.S. intelligen­ce agencies have said that Putin authorized a multiprong­ed campaign to boost Trump’s political chances and damage Clinton. The indictment points out that the two Russian companies involved in financing it hold various Russian government contracts.

The Kremlin’s spokesman, Dmitri Peskov, told the RBC news website that Russian officials haven’t familiariz­ed themselves with the document yet.

Rosenstein said repeatedly that the indictment does not allege that the Russian operation changed the outcome of the presidenti­al election.

Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Sharon LaFraniere of The New York Times; by Eric Tucker, Mary Clare Jalonick, Desmond Butler and Raphael Satter of The Associated Press; and by David Voreacos, Steven T. Dennis, Jeffrey D. Grocott, Erik Larson, Andrew Harris, Christian Berthelsen, Tom Schoenberg, Ksenia Galouchko and Greg Farrell of Bloomberg News.

 ?? AP/JACQUELYN MARTIN ?? Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said the defendants “took extraordin­ary steps to make it appear that they were ordinary American political activists.”
AP/JACQUELYN MARTIN Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said the defendants “took extraordin­ary steps to make it appear that they were ordinary American political activists.”
 ??  ?? Mueller
Mueller

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States