Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Wife’s choice of food has cooked up a huff in husband

- CAROLYN HAX Chat online with Carolyn at 11 a.m. each Friday at washington­post.com. Write to Tell Me About It in care of The Washington Post, Style Plus, 1150 15th St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20071; or email

DEAR CAROLYN: My wife refuses to change her diet and grocery shopping to accommodat­e my health needs and those of our kids. Everything she gets is processed grains and sugar. My doctor recently recommende­d losing weight, and exercise won’t cut it. But because she had an eating disorder when she was a teenager, she defends her actions by saying I should be happy she’s eating at all.

I’m at my wits’ end. If I step in and start doing more grocery shopping, it will be, “You don’t trust me to do anything right” — but she’s also not compromisi­ng on frozen pizzas, crackers, sugary cereals.

How can I approach this conversati­on with her that won’t lead to confrontat­ion?

— Anonymous DEAR READER: Your wife has said two very important things already: her history of disordered eating is still in the present and very much on her mind; and her way of dealing with it involves frozen pizzas, crackers and sugary cereals.

It may seem obvious that her food choices are unhealthy and therefore an appropriat­e target for spousal persuasion, but even though “health” is one category, you and she — and your kids — have very different, very specific needs that fall under that heading.

With her grocery shopping, she takes care of her needs. She buys whatever food will keep her eating.

That you not disrupt this fragile balance is a valid thing for her to ask of you. She may not be making this request in those exact words, but her claims and deeds and history in combinatio­n are saying it for her.

So don’t disrupt it, and instead take care of your needs on your own: Shop for and prepare what you need to eat.

If your wife responds to that by saying, “You don’t trust me to do anything right,” then respond to her with validation, compassion and a pragmatic alternate viewpoint. “I can see how you’d think that. But I’m trusting you to do what you need for your own health — and you’re right to do it. It’s just time for me to manage my own health instead of asking you to manage it for me.”

This brings us to your kids and their distinct need in this household. With you and your wife both fighting important battles involving food, the most important thing you can do together is not create any (further) associatio­n in your kids’ minds between eating and conflict.

Once made, a connection like that is very difficult to break — and if food becomes problemati­c for them, it’s not as if they can just remove it from their lives like people do with, say, alcohol or pornograph­y or abusive relatives. People with food problems have to face their demons every day for the rest of their lives. You and your wife both know this the hard way.

So please make this the only conversati­on you approach with your wife on the subject: “What our kids eat is not important compared with the way you and I handle food. What do you think about giving our kids both kinds of food in balance, and agreeing not to disagree?”

 ?? Washington Post Writers Group/NICK GALIFIANAK­IS ?? tellme@washpost.com
Washington Post Writers Group/NICK GALIFIANAK­IS tellme@washpost.com
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States