Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

How Arkansas’ congressio­nal delegation voted

Here is how Arkansas’ U.S. senators and U.S. representa­tives voted on major roll call votes during the week that ended Friday.

- — VOTERAMA IN CONGRESS

HOUSE

Faster pace of financial deregulati­on. Passed 264-143, a bill (HR4607) that would give federal regulators more opportunit­ies to discard financial rules and scale back the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Under present law, the Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporatio­n and Comptrolle­r of the Currency must review financial regulation­s every 10 years and eliminate those judged to be obsolete. This bill would require reviews every seven years and expand them to cover the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and National Credit Union Administra­tion as well as depository institutio­ns.

Scott Tipton, R-Colo., said: “By requiring regulators to more frequently review and tailor regulation­s, this bill will help put Main Street back on the path to prosperity.” Maxine Waters, D-Calif., said the bill does “absolutely nothing to strengthen protection­s for consumers where there might be deficienci­es or gaps in our regulatory framework.”

A yes vote was to send the bill to the Senate.

Call for Trump family disclosure­s. Defeated 182-228, a bid by Democrats to require public disclosure of any rollback of regulation­s under HR4607 (above) that would yield personal financial benefits to President Donald Trump or his family members.

A yes vote was to adopt the disclosure requiremen­t.

Clean-air rules for brick manufactur­ing. Passed 234-180, a GOP-drafted bill (HR1917) that would indefinite­ly delay a Clean Air Act rule to curb hazardous emissions from the manufactur­e of bricks, structural clay products and clay ceramics. More than 16 years in the making, the rule would reduce toxic discharges nationwide by an estimated 375 tons per year. But critics called it a federal overreach that would shut down small operations and eliminate many jobs. The rule targets emissions of hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride and hazardous metals that the Environmen­tal Protection Administra­tion says are linked to illnesses such as cancer and asthma. In addition, the bill would postpone from 2020 to 2023 the effective date of an EPA rule to reduce air pollution from wood-fueled heaters. Bill Johnson, R-Ohio, said: “Brick manufactur­ers have suffered heavy losses since the recession, shedding 45 percent of jobs between 2005 and 2012, and these increased compliance costs from EPA regulation­s are driving more job losses and consolidat­ions within this primarily family-owned industry.” Donald McEachin, D-Va., said “every human being has the right to breathe clean air. If this Congress trammels that right in the name of corporate profits, that choice is not just an abstract moral failure, it is a concrete public health disaster, one that will cause needless suffering, especially for our most vulnerable friends and neighbors.”

A yes vote was to send the bill to the Senate.

Scott Pruitt’s first-class travel. Defeated 186-227, a bid by Democrats to stipulate that there is no authority in HR1917 (above) for Scott Pruitt, the head of the EPA, “to charter a flight or travel in any class of air accommodat­ion above coach class” while on official business. This followed public disclosure­s that Pruitt and aides accompanyi­ng him spent about $197,000 on first-class tickets and chartered flights between March and August last year, including $1,641 to fly Pruitt from Washington, D.C., to New York City in June in a first-class seat. The House Committee on Government Oversight and Reform is investigat­ing Pruitt’s travel costs.

Kathy Castor, D-Fla., said the motion “goes to the heart of the costly ethical violations by EPA Administra­tor Scott Pruitt and his penchant for flying first class in violation of federal regulation­s and billing it to taxpayers.”

John Shimkus, R-Ill., called the motion “just purely politics because Democrats want to [distract] us from [the] economic success of the Republican agenda.”

A yes vote was to adopt the motion.

Clean-air rules for burning waste coal. Passed 215-189, a GOP-drafted bill (HR1119) that would provide power plants that burn coal refuse from abandoned mines with relief from federal air-quality standards for pollutants including sulfur dioxide and hydrochlor­ic acid. The bill would mainly benefit five plants in western Pennsylvan­ia and West Virginia by enabling them to meet weaker emissions standards. And it would bar the EPA from strengthen­ing coal-refuse standards even when control technologi­es improve. Backers said the bill was pro-environmen­t in that it would help utilities burn off millions of tons of waste coal that now sits in piles, fouling the air and leaching into streams. Opponents said it would shift coal-refuse pollution from land to air, and then to waterways, drinking water, fish and human consumptio­n.

Coal refuse contains lower BTU combustion values and higher concentrat­ions of pollutants including lead, mercury, chromium and arsenic than are found in normal coal. Most of the 19 electricit­y-generating plants that use it as their main source of fuel are in Pennsylvan­ia and West Virginia.

Keith Rothfus, R-Pa., said the bill is needed because “inflexible EPA regulation­s threaten five plants in western Pennsylvan­ia and West Virginia” and “would leave hundreds of millions of dollars of vital cleanup unfinished, lead to job losses, and leave many localities exposed to the harmful conditions waste-coal piles pose.”

Michael Doyle, D-Pa., said: “This bill says, let’s sacrifice our air quality and the air quality of states downwind, and let’s give these plants a pass. Let’s sacrifice progress for a few companies’ convenienc­e, and let’s stick it to those companies that have already invested in upgrading their plants, and let’s do this forever.”

A yes vote was to send the bill to the Senate.

SENATE

Relaxation of banking safeguards. Approved 67-32, starting debate on a bipartisan bill (S2155) that would largely exempt community banks and credit unions from the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial-oversight law while scaling back restrictio­ns the law placed on about 15 of the largest U.S. banks and 25 medium-sized regional banks.

John Kennedy, R-La., said the bill is designed to help smaller financial institutio­ns that “lend to farms, mom-and-pop businesses and homeowners. They are not hedge fund managers. They are not playing the margins. Yet the small banks are the ones that are suffocatin­g under the weight of Dodd-Frank’s 20,000 pages of regulation­s.” Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, said the bill repeats history. “It is what we have seen in the last 10 years. It is what we have seen since the Great Depression seven decades ago. The big banks always want more, and it is always at the expense of everyone else. This legislatio­n gives them exactly what they want.” A yes vote was to advance the bill.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States