Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Mattis pins Afghan hopes on talks

Taliban reconcilia­tion, not fighting is path forward, he says

- ROBERT BURNS

KABUL, Afghanista­n — U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis said Tuesday that he believes victory in Afghanista­n is still possible — not necessaril­y on the battlefiel­d but in facilitati­ng a Taliban reconcilia­tion with the Afghan government.

Mattis spoke shortly before arriving in Kabul, where security concerns were so high that reporters traveling with him were not allowed to publish stories until his party had moved from the Kabul airport to the U.S.-led military coalition’s headquarte­rs. That was the first such restrictio­n on coverage of a Pentagon chief’s visit in memory.

Mattis said he would be meeting with President Ashraf Ghani and top U.S. commanders.

“We do look toward a victory in Afghanista­n,” he said, adding, “not a military victory — the victory will be a political reconcilia­tion” with the Taliban, which has achieved a stalemate in recent years and shown little interest in conceding to the Kabul government.

Mattis, a retired Marine general who commanded U.S. troops in southern Afghanista­n in the opening weeks of the war in 2001, said getting the Taliban to reconcile en masse may be “a bridge too far.” So the emphasis is on drawing in Taliban elements piecemeal.

He described this approach as an effort to “start peeling off those who are tired of fighting,” after more than 16 years of war.

“We know there is interest on the Taliban side,” he said.

He defined victory in Afghanista­n as a political settlement between the Taliban and the government, and an Afghan military that is capable of securing the country largely on its own. At that point, he said, Afghanista­n would not be “a haven for attacks internatio­nally” as it was when al-Qaida used the country as a launching pad for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the U.S.

Ghani opened his meeting with Mattis at the Presidenti­al Palace by expressing appreciati­on for the U.S. military’s sacrifices over the years and offering praise for the new war strategy approved in August by U.S. President Donald Trump.

Ghani called the new U.S. approach a “game changer.”

“It has forced every actor to re-examine their assumption­s,” he said, adding that in the short run this could intensify the conflict. On the positive side, he said, it enables his government to make an unconditio­nal peace offer to the Taliban without it looking like a surrender.

He said it also allowed his government to approach Pakistan with an offer of a “comprehens­ive dialogue.”

U.S. intelligen­ce officials are predicting that the war will remain stalemated as the traditiona­lly most intensive fighting season begins this spring.

The visit is Mattis’ second since Trump announced in August that, despite his instinct to pull U.S. troops out of Afghanista­n, his administra­tion would take a more aggressive approach to the conflict, now in its 17th year.

As part of an effort to bolster Afghan fighting strength, the U.S. in recent weeks sent an Army group of about 800 soldiers, accompanie­d by several hundred support troops, to advise the Afghans closer to the front lines. The U.S. also shifted A-10 attack planes and other aircraft from striking Islamic State militants in Syria and Iraq to Afghanista­n as part of Trump’s new approach. These and other moves boosted the number of U.S. troops in Afghanista­n by at least 3,500 to a total of more than 14,000.

Mattis has said the U.S. goal is to enable Afghan forces to weaken the Taliban to the point where the Afghans can manage their own security. Put another way, the aim is to convince the insurgents that they cannot win on the battlefiel­d, thus driving them to reconcile with the Afghan government.

Stephen Biddle, a George Washington University political science professor and longtime observer of the Afghan conflict, said he is skeptical that the new U.S. strategy will make a decisive difference militarily, although he sees “glimmers of hope” for progress toward a peace settlement.

He noted that both the Taliban and Ghani have spoken recently of pushing for reconcilia­tion. In late February, Ghani called on the Taliban to take part in peace talks to “save the country,” offering security and incentives such as passports to insurgents who are willing to join the negotiatio­ns.

Alice Wells, the State Department’s top official for South and Central Asian Affairs, said Friday at the United States Institute for Peace that Ghani’s approach is more accommodat­ing toward the Taliban than previous overtures by Kabul and deserves a thoughtful response from the Taliban.

Trump, however, said Jan. 29 that he sees no basis for peace talks as long as the Taliban are “killing people left and right.”

The Taliban stance is that talks for a conflict-ending compromise must take place with Washington, not Kabul.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States