Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
23 Brits told to go in Russia tit for tat
Both nations say reprisals not over
MOSCOW — Russia on Saturday announced it is expelling 23 British diplomats and threatened further retaliatory measures in a growing diplomatic dispute over a nerve-agent attack on a former spy in Britain.
Britain’s government said the move was expected, and that it doesn’t change its belief that Russia was behind the poisoning of Sergei Skripal and his daughter in the English city of Salisbury. Prime Minister Theresa May said Britain will consider further retaliatory steps in the coming days alongside its allies.
The Russian Foreign Ministry ordered the 23 diplomats to leave within a week. It also said it is ordering the closure in Russia of the British Council, a government-backed organization for cultural and scientific cooperation, and is ending an agreement to reopen the British Consulate in St. Petersburg. The measures were in response to “the provocative actions of the British side and the unsubstantiated accusations” against Russia, the ministry said.
The announcement followed Britain’s order last
week for 23 Russian diplomats to leave the U.K. because Russia was not cooperating in the case of the Skripals, who were found March 4 poisoned by a nerve agent that British officials say was developed in Russia. They remain in critical condition and a policeman who visited their home is in serious condition.
Tensions heightened further when U.K. Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson said Friday that it was “overwhelmingly likely” Putin personally ordered the operation, a comment described as “unpardonable diplomatic misconduct” by the Kremlin.
Johnson added to his Putin criticism on Saturday, writing in The Washington Post that the nerve-agent incident is “part of a pattern of reckless behavior” by the leader, citing Russia’s annexation of Crimea, cyberattacks in Ukraine, the hacking of Germany’s Parliament and Russia’s interference in foreign elections.
Britain’s Foreign Office said Saturday that “Russia’s response doesn’t change the facts of the matter — the attempted assassination of two people on British soil, for which there is no alternative conclusion other than that the Russian State was culpable.”
The British Council said it was “profoundly disappointed” at its pending closure. The organization has been operating in Russia since the 1991 fall of the Soviet Union.
“It is our view that when political or diplomatic relations become difficult, cultural relations and educational opportunities are vital to maintain on-going dialogue between people and institutions,” it said.
The Russian statement said the government could take further measures if Britain makes any more “unfriendly” moves.
Britain’s National Security Council will meet early this week to consider the next steps, May said.
BLAME GAME
Western powers see the nerve-agent attack as the latest sign of alleged Russian meddling abroad. The tensions threaten to overshadow Putin’s expected re-election today for another six-year presidential term.
The poisoning has plunged Britain and Russia into a war of recrimination and blame.
British Ambassador Laurie Bristow, who was summoned by the Foreign Ministry in Moscow on Saturday to be informed of the moves, said the poisoning was an attack on “the international rulesbased system on which all countries, including Russia, depend for their safety and security.”
“This crisis has arisen as a result of an appalling attack in the United Kingdom, the attempted murder of two people, using a chemical weapon developed in Russia and not declared by Russia at the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, as Russia was and is obliged to do under the Chemical Weapons Convention,” he said.
But Russian lawmaker Konstantin Kosachev blamed Britain for the escalating tensions.
“We have not raised any tensions in our relations, it was the decision by the British side without evidence,” he said.
Kosachev, who heads the foreign affairs committee in the upper house of the Russian parliament, said, “I believe sooner or later we will learn the truth and this truth will be definitely very unpleasant for the prime minister of the United Kingdom.”
Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Maria Zakharova denied that Russia or the Soviet Union had ever developed novichok, the class of nerve agent that Britain says was used to poison the Skripals.
But a Russian scientist disclosed details of a secret program to manufacture the military-grade nerve agents in the 1990s, and later published the formula.
Speaking on Russia-24 television, Zakharova on Saturday linked Britain’s angry reaction to the war in Syria. She said Britain is taking a tough line because of frustration at recent advances of Russian-backed Syrian government forces against Western-backed rebels.
Russia argues it has turned the tide of the international fight against Islamic State extremists by lending military backing to Syria’s government. With Russian help, Syrian forces have stepped up their offensive on rebel-held areas in recent days, leaving many dead.
The Czech Republic, Slovakia and Sweden on Saturday all rejected a suggestion by Zakharova that the nerve agent might have originated in their countries.
Swedish Foreign Minister Margot Wallstrom tweeted that she “forcefully reject(s) unacceptable and unfounded allegation” adding that “Russia
should answer UK questions instead.” Czech Foreign Minister Martin Stropnicky called it an “absurd accusation.”
British police appealed Saturday for witnesses who can help investigators reconstruct the Skripals’ movements in the crucial hours before they were found unconscious. It is still not clear how the Skripals came in contact with the nerve agent.
Russian media outlets are generally portraying the poisoning of the Skripals as a plot against Russia, one intended, improbably, to derail Putin’s election chances — he is widely expected to win easily — or as revenge for Britain’s having lost a bid years ago to host the World Cup soccer tournament.
“A Nervous Paralytic Reaction,” the state newspaper, Rossiyskaya Gazeta, proclaimed about the British response.” “Theresa May Has Poisoned Relations Between London and Moscow,” a headline in Izvestia declared.
Komsomolskaya Pravda, another newspaper, quoted a chemist, Zhores Medvedev, as saying that the attempted murders may have been the work of exiled Russian oligarchs who had somehow obtained the rare poison.
“This is a provocation,” he said. “The campaign that Britain has fomented with the World Cup soccer tournament, which instead of England will take place this year in Russia, always leads to certain suspicions.”
New tensions also have surfaced over the death Monday of a London-based Russian businessman, Nikolai Glushkov. British police said Friday that he died from compression to the neck and opened a murder investigation.
Russia also suspects foul play in Glushkov’s death and opened its own inquiry Friday.
British police said there is no apparent link between the attack on Glushkov and the poisoning of the Skripals, but both have raised alarm in the West at a time when Russia is increasingly assertive on the global stage and is facing investigations over alleged interference in Donald Trump’s 2016 election as U.S. president.
The tit-for-tat expulsions were the second such episode after geopolitically related poisonings in Britain.
After the British government blamed a Russian agent for adding a lethal dose of the radioactive element polonium-210 to tea sipped by Alexander Litvinenko, a former Russian Security Service officer, Britain expelled four Russian diplomats in 2007, and Russia responded in kind.
A U.K. public inquiry concluded in 2016 that Putin “probably” approved the killing.