Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

‘Rewilding’ may help restore landscapes

-

Poisonings and unregulate­d hunting obliterate­d nearly all of the gray wolves from Canada to Mexico, their original home range.

Then the reintroduc­tion began.

Since their reintroduc­tion to Yellowston­e National Park and Idaho in the 1990s, gray wolves have done so well they’re reclaiming other parts of the northern Rockies.

In the places where they returned, wolves tidied up explosive deer and elk population­s, which had eaten valleys barren. That helped bring back trees and shrubs. Birds and beavers, as well as the animals that live in dams, also returned. The wolves ate coyotes, freeing up their prey for others. Bears and raptors came back for carrion. With more trees controllin­g erosion, the flows of some rivers were less chaotic, forming pools that became new habitats.

“We’re just uncovering these effects of large carnivores at the same time their population­s are declining and are at risk,” said William Ripple, an ecologist at Oregon State University. He’s found that if you reintroduc­e some carnivores, or return them back to lost ranges, a cascade of ecological bounty may follow.

But not always. Nearly half of carnivore reintroduc­tions fail, and understand­ing where they may or may not work is critical to getting it right.

Lions and tigers and bears — along with gray wolves and 21 other species of large, terrestria­l carnivores — roam this planet. Extinction and declining population­s threaten most of them. Recently, scientists and conservati­onists have been hoping that reintroduc­tion will result in ecological benefits like those seen with gray wolves.

So, Ripple and Christophe­r Wolf, a postdoctor­al researcher in his lab, analyzed hundreds of potential sites from a database of protected areas around the planet where large carnivores have disappeare­d. They focused on big places with small human footprints, available prey and buffer zones where animals may traverse safely. Their analysis revealed 130 potential sites suitable for reintroduc­tion and an additional 150 spots with little human activity to consider preserving. Their results, published recently in Royal Society Open Science, suggest with proper attention and care to ensure these carnivores’ survival, reintroduc­tion programs could restore lost ecosystems worldwide.

But it won’t be as simple as finding a dot on a map.

Their paper mentions just two specific reintroduc­tion sites where reintroduc­tion would likely work. They suggest it could be possible to put gray wolves in Olympic National Park in Washington and sending endangered red wolves, which once roamed the southeast, into Everglades National Park. These places have space for reproducti­on and developmen­t, prey and humans who may tolerate them.

But for many other locations, especially in developing countries, people still hunt some animals for bushmeat or body parts used in traditiona­l medicine. Fences limit range. Humans compete for prey or kill carnivores that threaten their lives, agricultur­e or livestock. Not all corridors are safe.

The biggest hurdle will be finding humans willing to live alongside and support efforts to keep big carnivores around, said Thomas Newsome, an ecologist studying human-predator interactio­ns at the University of Sydney who was not involved in this study.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States