Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Automakers get air-rule rollback, but there’s catch

-

RYAN BEENE, JENNIFER A. DLOUHY AND JOHN LIPPERT

The titans of Detroit’s auto industry met with President Donald Trump four days after he took office and warned that jobs could be lost if the emission limits enacted by his predecesso­r weren’t made more flexible.

On Monday, the Trump administra­tion responded by agreeing to revise the standards set during President Barack Obama’s tenure — but in a way that may backfire on the automakers.

In announcing the decision, Environmen­tal Protection Agency Administra­tor Scott Pruitt included a tacit threat that the federal government might no longer go along with California’s smog fighting policies. That could lead to pollution rules that vary state by state, greatly complicati­ng life for the people making the cars.

“Automakers will get the flexibilit­y they wished for, but at what cost?” said Jessica Caldwell, executive director of industry analysis at the car shopping website Edmunds. “The unfortunat­e reality is that this decision comes with a logistical nightmare in the short term.”

After the EPA said that fuel-efficiency regulation­s for cars and light trucks were too stringent and Pruitt singled out California, officials of that state promptly vowed to defend its standards in court, signaling that years of litigation and uncertaint­y could lie ahead, further complicati­ng an industry already facing profound change from self-driving cars and mobility services.

Pruitt touted his decision Tuesday to auto industry representa­tives and free-market conservati­ves gathered inside the EPA’s Rachel Carson Green Room, named after a noted marine biologist whose work helped drive a global environmen­tal movement.

He was flanked by signs proclaimin­g “jobs,” “efficiency” and “certainty” — perhaps the very opposite of what the process of changing the rules will deliver.

John Bozzella, the chief executive officer of the Associatio­n of Global Automakers, said the group supports the EPA’s “course correction,” even as he highlighte­d the importance of a single, nationwide set of standards.

“We believe the best way to achieve our collective goals is under a single national program that provides an aggressive but achievable pathway, a variety of compliance tools and factors in the role of customers,” Bozzella said in a speech at EPA headquarte­rs.

For the Trump administra­tion, the move wasn’t solely about what automakers want. Trump’s agencies have been methodical­ly tearing up many of Obama’s signature policies. Nowhere is that more true than with environmen­tal rules, which represent the front line of Trump’s vow to lift regulatory burdens that he says throttle economic developmen­t.

The EPA’s move to pare Obama-era vehicle standards dovetails with other Trump efforts to roll back Obama policies combating climate change, including the Clean Power Plan that slashed greenhouse-gas emissions at power plants and regulation­s governing methane leaks at oil wells. Easing requiremen­ts meant to save fuel also align with Trump’s celebratio­n of U.S. oil production and American “energy dominance.”

Pruitt said the agency would work with California and other states. However, he said the agency was reexaminin­g the Clean Air Act waiver that has given California unique authority to set its own clean-air rules since 1970, and that Sacramento wouldn’t set auto efficiency rules for the nation.

“Cooperativ­e federalism doesn’t mean that one state can dictate standards for the rest of the country,” Pruitt said in the agency’s press release. “EPA will set a national standard for greenhouse gas emissions that allows auto manufactur­ers to make cars that people both want and can afford — while still expanding environmen­tal and safety benefits of newer cars.”

Twelve other states follow California’s emission rules, together accounting for about a third of the American automobile market.

The EPA will now begin drafting fresh auto standards for 2022-2025 alongside the National Highway Traffic Safety Administra­tion, which has been developing new fuel economy targets for the same period. The new rules will be adjusted from current levels “as appropriat­e,” Pruitt said.

California officials vowed to resist a Trump-led rollback of the federal targets, with state Attorney General Xavier Becerra threatenin­g a lawsuit and Air Resources Board chairman Mary Nichols blasting the EPA’s move as a bid to “demolish the nation’s clean car program.”

“California will not weaken its nationally accepted clean car standards, and automakers will continue to meet those higher standards, bringing better gas mileage and less pollution for everyone,” Nichols said in an emailed statement. “This decision takes the U.S. auto industry backward, and we will vigorously defend the existing clean vehicle standards and fight to preserve one national clean vehicle program.”

Automakers and their trade associatio­ns applauded Pruitt’s decision but stressed the need to preserve a single set of aligned standards nationwide.

“Our priorities for modernizin­g the standards are the need for one national set of requiremen­ts and the need to comprehend new technology developmen­ts and increased shared and autonomous electric vehicles,” General Motors Co. said in a statement. “We look forward to working with all parties on modernized standards that achieve better fuel economy for our customers and a better environmen­t for everyone.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States