Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Rutledge opioid suit bid rejected by court

- AMANDA CLAIRE CURCIO

In a unanimous decision Friday, the Arkansas Supreme Court denied the attorney general’s demand that a prosecutin­g attorney drop a lawsuit against opioid-makers that’s similar to her own.

The high court’s onepage formal order does not include an explanatio­n of its ruling.

Attorney General Leslie Rutledge filed a lawsuit last month in Pulaski County against three opioid manufactur­ers that blamed the companies for fueling the opioid epidemic in Arkansas, where there are more painkiller prescripti­ons than people.

The other lawsuit was filed 10 days earlier in Crittenden County by Prosecutin­g Attorney Scott Ellington, representi­ng the state, and a coalition of 87 Arkansas cities and counties. That suit targets opioid-makers, as well as distributo­rs and retailers, for their part in the public health crisis.

In an emergency petition for writ of mandamus filed Monday, Rutledge argued that she was the state’s “chief law officer” and that Ellington didn’t have the authority to represent Arkansas in the litigation. Ellington is prosecutor for the 2nd Judicial Circuit, which covers Clay, Craighead, Crittenden, Greene, Mississipp­i and Poinsett counties.

Ellington responded to her petition Wednesday, asserting that Rutledge’s interpreta­tion of the law was “cherry-picked” and that he had “concurrent power” to represent the state in litigation.

The justices sided with Ellington. After the decision was released Friday, the prosecutor told the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette that he believed that he “had the law on his side” and that he “was confident the Supreme Court would follow the law.”

“We fully believe that what these Arkansas counties and cities are doing on behalf of their communitie­s is right and just,” said Chris Villines, executive director of the Associatio­n of Arkansas Counties, in a prepared statement released Friday. Villines’ organizati­on is a lead plaintiff in the Ellington suit.

In a prepared response to the decision, Rutledge’s staff said that tens of millions of dollars are at stake and that the attorney general will “continue to aggressive­ly pursue her case.”

“The Attorney General hopes that both lawsuits are successful in holding those responsibl­e for the opioid crisis accountabl­e and to provide much needed resources to the cities, counties and state to combat it,” the statement said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States