Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

JUDGE QUESTIONS

Manafort charges.

- MATTHEW BARAKAT Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Anne Flaherty of The Associated Press.

ALEXANDRIA, Va. — A federal judge on Friday asked pointed questions about special counsel Robert Mueller’s authority to bring charges against Paul Manafort, Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman, and suggested that prosecutor­s’ true motive is getting Manafort to “sing” against the president.

Manafort’s lawyers argued at a hearing in Alexandria that the tax and bank fraud charges are far afield from Mueller’s mandate to investigat­e Russian meddling in the 2016 election and whether any coordinati­on with Trump associates occurred.

“I don’t see what relationsh­ip this indictment has with what the special counsel is investigat­ing,” U.S. Senior Judge T.S. Ellis III, an appointee of former President Ronald Reagan, told government lawyers at Friday’s hearing.

The Virginia indictment alleges Manafort hid tens of millions of dollars he earned advising pro-Russia politician­s in Ukraine from the Internal Revenue Service, money earned from 2006 through 2015. The indictment accuses Manafort of fraudulent­ly obtaining millions in loans from financial institutio­ns later, after his Ukrainian work dwindled. Prosecutor­s say that part of the conspiracy stretched from 2015 through January 2017, including the months while he was working on the Trump campaign.

Under questionin­g from Ellis, government lawyers admitted that Manafort had been under investigat­ion for years in the Eastern District of Virginia before Mueller was ever appointed special counsel. And Ellis said it was implausibl­e to think that the charges against Manafort, which primarily concern his business dealings and tax returns from about 2005 through 2015, could have a real connection to Trump’s 2016 presidenti­al campaign.

Ellis suggested the real reason Mueller is pursuing Manafort is to pressure him to “sing” against Trump, though he also noted that such a strategy is a “time-honored practice” for prosecutor­s and not necessaril­y illegal. Ellis went on to say that defense lawyers are naturally concerned that defendants in that situation will not only sing but “compose” — meaning that they’ll make up facts.

“You really care about wanting informatio­n you could get from Mr. Manafort that would relate to Mr. Trump and lead to his prosecutio­n, or impeachmen­t, or whatever,” Ellis said.

Later Friday, Trump praised Ellis during a speech to the National Rifle Associatio­n and called him a “highly respected judge.” Trump read news articles highlighti­ng Ellis’ quotes about the case and his suggestion that the special counsel’s goal is to squeeze Manafort. “I’ve been saying that for a long time,” Trump said.

At the hearing, government lawyer Michael Dreeben responded to Ellis that the special counsel’s mandate is broad and that Manafort fits within that jurisdicti­on because of his connection­s to both the Trump campaign and to Ukrainian and Russian officials.

“We needed to understand and explore those relationsh­ips and follow the money where it led,” Dreeben said.

Dreeben also argued that the Justice Department has broad discretion to set its own rules for what should be designated to the special counsel’s jurisdicti­on and that a judge has no role trying to regulate it.

“We are the Justice Department,” Dreeben said of the special counsel’s office. “We are not separate from the Justice Department.”

That argument prompted Ellis to question the wisdom of granting “unfettered power” to a special counsel with a $10 million budget.

“I’m sure you’re sensitive to the fact that the American people feel pretty strongly about no one having unfettered power,” Ellis said.

He asked Dreeben if the special counsel had already blown through its $10 million budget; Dreeben declined to answer.

Manafort’s lawyer, Kevin Downing, has argued that a special counsel should be tightly constraine­d in how it operates. He noted that the law authorizin­g the special counsel was passed to replace the old independen­t counsel law, which was derided for allowing overbroad, yearslong investigat­ions during the administra­tions of Reagan and former President Bill Clinton.

Downing has argued that the charges should be dismissed if Mueller lacked authority to bring them. Ellis, though, suggested another remedy would be to simply hand the case back to regular federal prosecutor­s.

Ellis withheld ruling on the motion and will issue a written ruling at a later date.

 ?? AP/KEVIN WOLF ?? Paul Manafort (center), former campaign director for President Donald Trump, leaves the federal courthouse in Alexandria, Va., on Friday with his wife, Kathleen, and his attorney, Kevin Downey.
AP/KEVIN WOLF Paul Manafort (center), former campaign director for President Donald Trump, leaves the federal courthouse in Alexandria, Va., on Friday with his wife, Kathleen, and his attorney, Kevin Downey.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States