Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Disabled folks paid little, but call for shift stirs fear

- AMANDA CLAIRE CURCIO

Alexis Brown used to think that having a disability meant her life had to look a certain way, that she wouldn’t have choices when she grew up.

The 19-year-old doesn’t believe that anymore.

She wants to be a cosmetolog­ist. She also likes working with little kids, so maybe she’ll get a job in child care or at a school. Or she could go to college, major in criminolog­y and then build a career in the justice system. So many choices.

Alexis is no longer the young girl who tried to hide her intellectu­al and hearing disabiliti­es from people.

“It was hard to fit in,” she

said. “People would talk to me like I was slow, like I didn’t matter. I felt alone.”

Almost three years ago, the J.A. Fair High School graduate joined Arkansas Promise, a research project that helps students with disabiliti­es find meaningful career paths. Counselors taught her to expand her social skills and linked her to employers who gave her short-term job experience­s, which let her see what it was like working in various fields.

“They teach us at our pace, and they take their time with us,” Alexis said. “I gained my independen­ce because of them.”

Research shows that programs like Arkansas Promise that work with young people with disabiliti­es while they’re still in school lead to better jobs.

Advocates for people with disabiliti­es consider such projects positive alternativ­es to the use of U.S. Department of Labor certificat­es that allow employers to hire people with disabiliti­es at less than the federal minimum wage.

Attempts to phase out the certificat­e program have been made in Congress, and a group of senators has asked the Labor Department to take that action on its own.

But other lawmakers and providers say that eliminatin­g the certificat­es would take away opportunit­ies for Arkansans with disabiliti­es.

And Arkansas Promise’s federal funding ends in September. The demonstrat­ion program, which enrolled 2,000 students, has operated with a $35.7 million, five-year grant from the U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Social Security Administra­tion.

At least 3,100 Arkansans work under the Section 14(c) certificat­es, a Depression-era provision in the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that allows employers to pay less than the minimum wage to people with disabiliti­es. More than 150,000 workers are covered through these certificat­es in the United States.

People with disabiliti­es who work under the 14(c) certificat­es often are employed in places called sheltered workshops, which are operated through nonprofit entities known as community rehabilita­tion programs.

About 40 workshops are scattered throughout Arkansas. In them, employees perform rote tasks, often irrespecti­ve of individual skills or capabiliti­es. That equates to a lot of recycling, shredding, sorting and packaging. Many earn just pennies an hour.

The certificat­e program “further stigmatize­s” employees with disabiliti­es and perpetuate­s the idea that they can’t hold regular jobs, said Caroline Boch of Disability Rights Arkansas, a nonprofit advocacy organizati­on.

“We need to move from a focus on limitation to a focus on abilities and capabiliti­es and opportunit­ies for people to make choices about what they want to do with their life,” Boch said.

The federally empowered watchdog group released a report earlier this year asserting that state agencies fell short in efforts to help people with disabiliti­es move from segregated employment, such as the shops, to more integrated workplaces, where they can work alongside people without disabiliti­es.

The report found, for instance, that Arkansas Rehabilita­tion Services, a division of the state’s Department of Career Education, didn’t spend the required amount of federal grant money on pre-employment transition services that help workers with disabiliti­es find better jobs.

Rehabilita­tion programs are supposed to provide vocational rehabilita­tive services that help workers maximize their employabil­ity. Arkansas Rehabilita­tion Services funds community-based employment services through these programs.

The Department of Human Services also funds adult day habilitati­on services onsite. Habilitati­on aims to promote independen­t living and good health through activities that focus on community integratio­n, building relationsh­ips, social and communicat­ion skills, and recreation­al experience­s.

But Disability Rights Arkansas’ report on the workshops claims that the vast majority of workers with disabiliti­es aren’t using these extra services.

The state relies too much on the workshops, and state agencies need to do more to help people with disabiliti­es find better jobs, the Disability Rights Arkansas report concluded.

Those who want to keep the shops open say that many people don’t have the capacity to work in integrated environmen­ts or prefer the workshops.

Closing the workshops would rob certain adults with disabiliti­es of any meaningful prospects, essentiall­y reducing them to couch potatoes able only to collect disability checks from the government, said some caregivers and providers.

“It’s not one size fits all,” said Karen Kight, director of Abilities Unlimited of Hot Springs.

“We support individual­s being free to make informed choices. Arkansas needs to protect the funding that will allow individual­s to be a part of the community. … These programs are a very vital part of their community.”

Her nonprofit, she said, offers a “full array of employment options,” not just sheltered workshops.

The program also gives adults with disabiliti­es the chance to participat­e in career developmen­t programs and “supported employment,” in which a job coach serves as a mentor by assisting them with their job searches, placements and interviews, as well as training of job duties at work sites.

SUCCESSFUL OUTCOMES

People with disabiliti­es face segregatio­n in schools and work opportunit­ies, Disability Rights Arkansas found in its February report.

“It’s time for Arkansas to do better,” wrote Boch, who authored the report. “We must remove the obstacles that still exist.”

Between 2016 and 2017, inspectors with Disability Rights Arkansas visited dozens of sheltered workshops, and spoke with employees and providers to compile the report. They set out to evaluate the status of the shops, workers’ access to competitiv­e employment and the needs for services or training for people with disabiliti­es.

Disability Rights believes that, if workers with disabiliti­es had more support, they’d be significan­tly less likely to work in the sheltered shops. The group wants to see more people with disabiliti­es in integrated settings — meaning jobs where they interact with community members and that grant them more financial autonomy.

The report found that the state’s Rehabilita­tion Services agency didn’t dedicate enough federal funds to pre-employment transition services, which help young adults with disabiliti­es learn more skills so they can get competitiv­e jobs, instead of staying at the segregated shops. Services can include career counseling, internship­s and workplace readiness training.

For instance, the division was supposed to spend nearly $6 million — at least 15 percent of its vocational rehabilita­tion money — in federal fiscal 2015, which ran from Oct. 1, 2014, to Sept. 30, 2015. Instead, it allocated about $1.2 million, just 3 percent. The unspent funds went back to the federal government.

Alan McClain, the agency’s commission­er, said there weren’t enough pre-employment programs available, so there weren’t viable ways to spend the expected 15 percent. Also, agency staff members wanted to be deliberate in how they directed the funds, he said.

“We took our time to develop really good, sound programs, focusing on career exploratio­n and work-based learning, that have intended outcomes,” he said.

In federal fiscal 2016, the agency spent 8.5 percent of vocational rehabilita­tion grant funding for these services. The division is on track to meet its 15 percent requiremen­t this year.

The agency continues to do better, said Joe Baxter, deputy commission­er.

Arkansas Rehabilita­tion Services ceased making referrals to the sheltered workshops in July 2016 and boosted referrals for supported employment services.

Staffing levels have also improved. In 2016, there were 93 vocational rehabilita­tion counselor positions, 18 of which were vacant. Those positions are now filled, Baxter said.

Staff shortages and counselors’ heavy caseloads had contribute­d to a lack of enough support for many workers with disabiliti­es, according to the 2017 report that is required by the state’s Workforce Innovation and Opportunit­y Act. The 2014 law aimed to help ensure competitiv­e employment for the at-risk or most vulnerable, including people with disabiliti­es.

Too many people with disabiliti­es served by Rehabilita­tion Services don’t have positive employment outcomes because of large caseloads, delays in services and the limited time the counselor spends with each worker, the report stated.

A 2016 report by the Arkansas Workforce Developmen­t Board cited time spent by counselors on paperwork and “the consumer’s need for employment-related assistance” as likely impediment­s to Arkansas Rehabilita­tion Services’ “ability to adequately serve its consumers and retain qualified counselors.”

Rehabilita­tion Services has since placed counselors at each 14(c) sheltered workshop in the state to meet with workers more often than before.

“Caseload on average is leveling out,” Baxter said. “There is a learning curve with newer counselors. … We were down 10 or 20 counselors at one point. That has corrected itself in the last year.”

Baxter hopes that, with more counseling, workers will take advantage of available services at the shops, which could steer them to better jobs.

But even available services go mostly unused, according to Disability Rights’ February report. Only about 2 percent of sheltered-shop employees take advantage of offered vocational rehabilita­tion services, it said.

Nearly 70 percent have worked at the shops for more than a decade without moving on to better-paying jobs.

Services are scarce in rural areas of the state, particular­ly eastern Arkansas — leaving many workers without access to training needed to reach their vocational goals, the report stated.

Dale Turrentine, Arkansas Rehabilita­tion Services’ community program developmen­t manager, said the agency met with every sheltered workshop provider to discuss bringing in additional services.

These providers, however, don’t have enough money to pay for extra services, such as supported employment, according to a 2015 state needs assessment, a report required by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunit­y Act.

Agency chief McClain said his staff is brainstorm­ing other ways to better support people with disabiliti­es, including strengthen­ing relationsh­ips and outreach at local school districts.

People with disabiliti­es get better jobs when they receive pre-employment support during their high school years, research shows. But some schools don’t want vocational rehabilita­tion counselors on campus, which limits transition services, according to the 2015 needs assessment.

“Being placed at the workshop is not considered a ‘successful employment outcome’ for us,” McClain said. “We know there’s a need for this service, but we want people with disabiliti­es to have more choices, which in turn allows them greater dignity, a greater quality of life.”

MIXED RESULTS

Some policymake­rs say that advocates trying to end the use of 14(c) certificat­es too often disregard the population that’s severely disabled, people who can’t go anywhere but the shops.

Closing the workshops isn’t economical­ly feasible in Arkansas, said Kate McSweeney, vice president of ACCSES, a national advocacy group representi­ng more than 1,200 organizati­ons that provide services to people with disabiliti­es.

“More often than not, the community rehabilita­tion program is the only place in town,” she said. “We have to have practical policies. … It’s counterint­uitive to close the shops. We need to keep people attached to the workforce.”

ACCSES’ main goals are to maximize employment and independen­t living opportunit­ies for those with disabiliti­es.

Some states — including Alaska, New Hampshire, Maine and Vermont — have already curbed or eliminated use of 14(c) certificat­es. Because of limited research, it’s not always clear what happens when state government­s phase out workshops. Known results vary.

In Oklahoma, when segregated employment declined, integrated employment didn’t increase, according to a March 2017 article in the Social Innovation­s Journal. Instead, more people with disabiliti­es became jobless.

Maine’s results were similar — fewer shops meant that people with disabiliti­es spent more time doing nonwork activities, a 2015 study conducted by George Washington University found.

Yet in Vermont, the first state to phase out 14(c), employees with disabiliti­es moved to integrated workplaces after the last sheltered shop closed in 2005. About 38 percent of Vermont workers with disabiliti­es were employed at integrated settings in 2015, compared with the nationwide average of nearly 19 percent at the same time, concluded University of Massachuse­tts researcher­s.

Vermont’s success was rooted in decades-old policy changes. The University of Vermont received grants, starting in the 1980s, to fund integrated employment programs for disabled residents. The university worked with the state’s disability agencies in this effort.

Arkansas differs from these other states. They are more affluent, are winter and summer tourist destinatio­ns and have higher population­s, all conditions that make it possible for people with disabiliti­es to find work outside of 14(c), McSweeney said.

The rhetoric surroundin­g this debate is appalling, she added — “as if working with other people with disabiliti­es is inferior than working with people without disabiliti­es.”

Federal lawmakers unsuccessf­ully pushed legislatio­n to phase out the program in 2011 and last year. Now, seven U.S. senators are petitionin­g the federal Department of Labor to make such changes.

In a letter sent April 23, the senators requested that Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta stop the use of certificat­es because they “unjustifia­bly set low expectatio­ns for workers” and are “inherently discrimina­tory.”

Acosta had described the issue of sub-minimum wages as “a very difficult balance that I’m happy to have a further discussion about” during his confirmati­on hearing last year.

“I think this is a very difficult issue because you don’t want to disrespect individual­s in any way,” he said then. “The very phrase ‘sub-minimum wage’ is a disrespect­ful phrase. Yet, you want to provide incentives or systems to ensure that individual­s that might not otherwise have a job, have access to a job and are trained into a job.”

The department did not answer the newspaper’s requests for an interview. Acosta’s office hasn’t publicly responded to the senators’ letter.

Senators also cited concern about “past abuses of the program” and asked for more informatio­n on how the federal agency actively prevents the mistreatme­nt and discrimina­tion of workers.

Goodwill paid workers with disabiliti­es as low as $1.40 an hour, using the certificat­e program in 2011, while its executives were compensate­d more than $50 million, for instance. In other cases, law-enforcemen­t agencies raided sheltered workshops that had conditions akin to sweatshops.

And a 2014 USA Today investigat­ion found that federal officials approved sub-minimum wages even when a worker’s disability didn’t have any connection to the task at hand.

The letter also criticized the Labor Department’s lack of data, asking for more informatio­n about: how many were hired through 14(c); the program’s annual inspection­s; and earned wages.

On April 23, the same day of the senators’ letter, the Labor Department declared in a news release its commitment “to protecting Americans with disabiliti­es from exploitati­on in the workplace.”

The prepared statement didn’t touch on the overall 14(c) program. Instead, the department announced it had revoked the certificat­e of an Illinois-based nonprofit called Rock River Valley Self Help Enterprise­s for failing to properly track workers’ timecards and compensate them, at times paying them with gift cards.

Brian Colas, general counsel for U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., said that in meetings with Acosta,

Cotton has advocated keeping the shops open. Talks are underway for the secretary to tour Arkansas workshops with Cotton sometime this summer, Colas said.

After an April visit to Mid-Arkansas River Valley Abilities, a Russellvil­le-based sheltered workshop, Cotton said he’d continue to protect such programs “from any effort to close them down.”

Disability Rights Arkansas doesn’t seek to phase out the shops without a plan.

The state should draft alternativ­es for people with disabiliti­es that aren’t these segregated settings, the group recommende­d. Suggestion­s in the nonprofit’s report include creating tax incentives for businesses to hire people with disabiliti­es at or above the minimum wage and boosting funding for supported employment so that people with disabiliti­es can get help from trained counselors on the job site.

“The goal should be to get the community to want to be a part of this,” said Tom Masseau, Disability Rights director. “It has to become part of their business philosophy or model.”

‘LIKE FAMILY’

Marcus Leonard tried working at a “regular” job before. But he often felt rushed, and sometimes he didn’t understand what was expected of him, he said.

It seemed like his boss didn’t want to explain things twice. One day, unsure of what was being asked of him, he cried on the job.

“Shut up. I don’t work with cry babies,” was his manager’s reaction.

Marcus — who describes himself as mentally challenged, not disabled — can hold down a regular job with minimal accommodat­ions. But the 24-year-old felt more alone in this integrated setting than anywhere else.

He left that job and stayed at home for a while. Finding work at traditiona­l places was still tough.

“I pretty much would sit in front of the TV all day,” he said. “Let me tell you this, it’s boring.”

Later, Marcus began working at the Abilities Unlimited shelter in Hot Springs. He’s on the production line, piecing together parts of oil tanks and other products for Husqvarna Group , a Swedish outdoor power equipment manufactur­er with an Arkansas plant in Nashville. The work is repetitive, but he can go at his own pace. He also participat­es in a daily 45-minute exercise class on-site.

“I love working here,” he said. “They treat me like family.”

Marcus fears that if the workshops closed, he’d be back at home, back on that dreaded couch.

“Taking this away from people would be the worst thing possible,” he said.

La Vonda Hughes, Marcus’ mother, thinks her son would suffer if Abilities Unlimited shut down.

“This is the best option for us,” Hughes said. “My son realizes there are other options. … I had rather my child get up, have a purpose in life and be happy.”

 ?? Special to the Democrat-Gazette ?? Tiyun Nealy works on an art project at Arkansas Promise, a research project that provides education, employment training and support services for 2,000 Arkansas teenagers with disabiliti­es to help them develop job skills.
Special to the Democrat-Gazette Tiyun Nealy works on an art project at Arkansas Promise, a research project that provides education, employment training and support services for 2,000 Arkansas teenagers with disabiliti­es to help them develop job skills.
 ?? Special to the Democrat-Gazette ?? Art instructor Adrianne Toney (center) provides guidance to Austin Miller Burns (right) during a class at Arkansas Promise, a project aimed at helping teenagers with disabiliti­es prepare for careers. Others taking part include (from left) Nolan Smith...
Special to the Democrat-Gazette Art instructor Adrianne Toney (center) provides guidance to Austin Miller Burns (right) during a class at Arkansas Promise, a project aimed at helping teenagers with disabiliti­es prepare for careers. Others taking part include (from left) Nolan Smith...
 ??  ?? Boch
Boch
 ??  ?? McClain
McClain
 ??  ?? Acosta
Acosta
 ??  ?? Cotton
Cotton

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States