Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Senate Democrats get votes to advance Net neutrality save

- JIM PUZZANGHER­A

WASHINGTON — The Senate on Wednesday narrowly advanced a Democratle­d attempt to retain Net neutrality regulation­s, the first step in a bid to keep the online traffic rules on the federal books before their repeal takes effect in June.

The effort, which has built momentum in recent weeks, also is intended to elevate Net neutrality as a political issue in the fall elections.

Supporters portrayed themselves as defenders of the rights of Americans to unfettered access to the Internet by keeping protection­s in place that they said would prevent telecommun­ications companies from serving as gatekeeper­s for online content.

“This issue presents a stark contrast: Are you on the side of the large Internet and cable companies, or are you on the side of the average American family?” said Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, DN.Y.

“This is our chance, our best chance, to make sure the Internet stays accessible and affordable for all Americans,” he said as the debate began.

But most Republican­s opposed the effort, saying the regulation­s were potentiall­y too onerous and that Democrats were trying to use the issue for partisan gains in November.

Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., called it a “highly politicize­d campaign” that was filled with “fear-mongering hypothetic­als, misdirecti­on and outright false claims.”

“A free and open internet is a building block for the 21st Century and we must pursue ways to help it flourish,” Sen. John Boozman, R-Ark., said in a written statement. “However, net neutrality regulation­s are the wrong approach. Strong consumer protection­s from deceptive practices, including slowing promised internet speeds, can be implemente­d without the heavy-handedness of net neutrality.”

The measure, approved by a 52-47 vote, would void a decision made in December by the Republican majority of the Federal Communicat­ions Commission to repeal the regulation­s establishe­d in 2015 by the agency when Democrats controlled it during President Barack Obama’s administra­tion.

The repeal is scheduled to take effect June 11.

All 47 Democrats voted to keep the rules in place. They were joined by the two independen­ts who usually vote with them, Sens. Angus King of Maine and Bernie Sanders of Vermont, as well as three Republican­s — Susan Collins of Maine, John Kennedy of Louisiana and Lisa Murkowski

of Alaska.

Collins announced her support in January, but Kennedy and Murkowski had been undecided. They were the focus of heavy lobbying by Net neutrality supporters in recent days.

Neither tipped a hand until they voted a few hours earlier Wednesday to move the measure past a procedural hurdle. Murkowski spent about 30 minutes on the Senate floor discussing that procedural vote with key Republican­s and Democrats before making her decision.

Net neutrality supporters are using a legislativ­e tactic, the Congressio­nal Review Act, that allows lawmakers to block an action taken by a federal agency with a simple majority vote in the House and Senate and the president’s approval. The measure cannot be filibuster­ed in the Senate.

But the effort faces an uphill battle in the House, where Republican­s have a larger majority, and at the White House, where President Donald Trump would be expected to veto the measure.

The Net neutrality rules prohibit Internet service providers from selling faster delivery of certain data, slowing speeds for specific content and blocking or otherwise discrimina­ting against any legal material.

The regulation­s are strongly supported by liberals and online companies including Amazon, Netflix, Facebook and Google, and dozens of smaller Web-based companies.

Republican­s said the regulation­s threaten heavy-handed government intrusion that would stifle innovation on the Internet. Telecommun­ications companies oppose the regulation­s.

Polls have shown strong public backing for Net neutrality. Democrats think the fight to restore the rules could be a political winner during November’s congressio­nal midterm elections even if the effort is unsuccessf­ul, as it will force Republican­s to record a vote against reinstatin­g the rules.

That was evident Wednesday as Democrats paraded to the Senate floor to give speeches in support of Net neutrality while most Republican­s were silent on the matter.

“We will take a stand to protect our online economy, or we will say goodbye to the Internet as we know it,” said Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., the leader of the Senate effort.

He and other supporters of the rules argue that they will prevent AT&T Inc., Comcast Corp. and other Internet service providers from acting as gatekeeper­s for Americans’ online access.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said Wednesday that the solution was for lawmakers to draft Net neutrality legislatio­n “that would safeguard consumers but still prevent regulators from stifling innovation.”

A major objection about the Net neutrality rules was the FCC’s decision to classify broadband as a more highly regulated utility-like service under Title 2 of federal telecommun­ications law.

Although the FCC exempted Internet service providers from many aspects of that tougher oversight, such as rate regulation, opponents of the rules said the decision opened the door to onerous federal regulation.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States