Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Error by pot winner found

Same slip-up got rival disqualifi­ed

- HUNTER FIELD

One of the winning applicatio­ns for Arkansas’ first medical-marijuana growing licenses contained the same discrepanc­ies that disqualifi­ed at least one other applicant.

Delta Medical Cannabis Co. of Newport reported different ownership percentage­s for one stakeholde­r in separate sections of its applicatio­n, but the mistake went either unnoticed or unpunished as the group was selected to receive one of five cultivatio­n permits.

However, Carpenter Farms Medical Group of Grady was disqualifi­ed from the process after regulators found the same error on its applicatio­n.

Scott Hardin, a spokesman for the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administra­tion, said that

any disqualify­ing informatio­n brought forth will be investigat­ed, and that the Carpenter Farms error was discovered before a judge stopped all medical-marijuana licensing.

“We have been unable to investigat­e several items brought to our attention due to the injunction issued in March,” Hardin said in an email. “Regarding Carpenter Farms, we were made aware of informatio­n (prior to March 14) that demanded the applicatio­n be disqualifi­ed. If additional, similar informatio­n is discovered, we will take action to maintain the integrity of the process but to do so now would be inappropri­ate due to unresolved litigation.”

Attorneys and representa­tives for Delta Medical Cannabis Co. didn’t respond to phone messages and emailed questions on Monday about the ownership discrepanc­y.

Both Delta and Carpenter Farms are intervenin­g parties in a lawsuit filed by an unsuccessf­ul applicant — Naturalis Health — challengin­g the state’s process for awarding the first cannabis growing permits. Pulaski County Circuit Judge Wendell Griffen in March sided with Naturalis, tossing the procedure the Arkansas Medical Marijuana Commission used to select the first five licensees.

That ruling has been appealed to the Arkansas Supreme Court, which is expected to rule soon. Its decision will drasticall­y affect when the drug, which Arkansans voted to legalize in 2016, will be available in the Natural State.

Unsuccessf­ul applicants have pointed to a handful of inconsiste­ncies in the scoring process. Those claims have ranged from regulators failing to verify that applicants are compliant with key requiremen­ts to allegation­s of attempted bribery.

If regulators determined that Delta’s applicatio­n too should be rejected, it would shuffle which companies stand to receive licenses if the process is upheld by the high court. The two companies behind Delta Medical in the rankings received identical scores.

The commission elected to award five growing permits, but Amendment 98 to the Arkansas Constituti­on allows for up to eight cultivatio­n facilities.

In Delta Medical’s case, four individual­s and three limited liability companies comprise the marijuana growing company’s ownership.

One of those companies, 420 Grow LLC, is shared by Balbir “Bill” Mangat (whose name is also spelled as “Magnat” in the applicatio­n) and Mississipp­i County Justice of the Peace Ken Kennemore. The company holds 14.8 percent of Delta Medical.

Mangat claims a 50 percent ownership stake in 420 Grow at the front of Delta’s applicatio­n, but later in the applicatio­n, he claims only 25 percent.

Similarly, Carpenter Farms, which is owned by a pair of limited liability companies, misreporte­d the ownership structure of one of the companies later in its applicatio­n after reporting it correctly near the front.

The first section of Carpenter’s applicatio­n lists three owners, William H. Murphy Jr., William H. Murphy III and Seth Murphy, as holding 11.66 percent each. However, they report their interests in Carpenter Farms as 5.83 percent each in one location of the applicatio­n and then each was listed as having 4.06 percent interest in another section.

Mary Robin Casteel, director of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Administra­tion Division, said the discrepanc­y made it impossible to confirm who owned the company.

“Without all ownership interest accounted for, there is no way for the commission to determine and verify that ownership in the applicatio­n is only held by qualified individual­s,” Casteel wrote in a Feb. 28 email to Abraham Carpenter Jr., one of the company’s owners.

Carpenter acknowledg­ed the “scrivener’s error,” but he said it shouldn’t have disqualifi­ed his company from considerat­ion because the ownership percentage­s were correctly recorded in the first section of the applicatio­n.

“Had the applicatio­n failed to include the correct total individual ownership of Carpenter Farms Medical Group anywhere in the applicatio­n, the staff’s decision to exclude our applicatio­n could be considered grounds for disqualifi­cation,” Carpenter wrote in a letter to the commission. “However, the correct ownership informatio­n for the applicatio­n was, in fact, included.”

Carpenter’s group was one of several scheduled to appear before the commission on March 14 to have their cases heard. The meeting — which was called to formally award the five cultivatio­n permits — was canceled after Griffen issued an injunction, barring the commission from issuing licenses.

Carpenter Farms would have ranked sixth, two points behind Delta, if its applicatio­n had been included in the rankings. Although it wouldn’t stand to receive a license, Carpenter said he’d like his company to be there in case one of the top five groups is disqualifi­ed or otherwise withdraws from considerat­ion.

Ninety-five companies submitted applicatio­ns to cultivate medical cannabis, which must be grown in Arkansas. The applicatio­ns were redacted to remove any informatio­n that would allow the five commission­ers to identify the people behind the companies, but several unsuccessf­ul applicants have challenged whether the redactions were adequate.

The commission­ers then scored each applicatio­n, and the five highest-scoring groups were selected for a license.

Medical marijuana can also be grown in small quantities in dispensari­es; 227 groups applied for one of 32 permits to sell the drug. The commission started grading those proposals, but the court’s injunction halted that process as well.

The state Department of Health has approved more than 4,000 applicatio­ns for medical-marijuana registry ID cards. The cards will allow patients with one of 18 qualifying conditions to purchase medical cannabis.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States