Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Trump ‘no’ adds fuel to outcry over Russia

- Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by John Wagner and Felicia Sonmez of The Washington Post; by Eileen Sullivan of The New York Times; by Zeke Miller, Ken Thomas and Lisa Mascaro of The Associated Press; and by Frank E. Lockwood of the Arkansas

President Donald Trump sparked a new uproar over his outreach toward Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday by appearing to suggest that Russia is no longer targeting U.S. elections — prompting the White House to assert hours later that Trump’s words had been misconstru­ed. At the start of a Cabinet meeting at the White House, a reporter asked, “Is Russia still targeting the U.S., Mr. President?” “Thank you very much. No,” Trump responded, shaking his head. “No? You don’t believe that to be the case?” “No,” Trump repeated before the questioner concluded. Trump went on to say that no president has been tougher on Russia than he has. “I think President Putin knows that better than anybody, certainly a lot better than the media,” Trump told reporters. Several hours later, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Trump was saying “no” to whether he would take further questions from reporters — not to whether he believed Russia continued to target the U.S. with hostile actions. “The president said, ‘Thank you very much,’ and was saying ‘no’ to answering questions,” Sanders said. “The president and his administra­tion are working very hard to make sure that Russia is unable to meddle as they have done in the past.”

She added: “Certainly, like I just said, we believe that the threat still exists, which is why we are taking steps to prevent it.” Later Wednesday, in an interview with CBS News, Trump said he had told the Russian leader face to face to stay out of America’s elections. In Helsinki at their summit Monday, he said, “I let him know we can’t have this. We’re not going to have it, and that’s the way it’s going to be.” Asked if he would he hold Putin personally responsibl­e for further election interferen­ce, he said, “I would, because he’s in charge of the country.” Trump’s statement from Wednesday’s Cabinet meeting directly contradict­s assertions from Dan Coats, the director of national intelligen­ce, who has repeatedly said that Russia continues to try to interfere with American democracy. “These actions are persistent, they are pervasive and they are meant to undermine America’s democracy,” Coats said in a speech Friday. In his remarks, Coats said the intelligen­ce community continues to see efforts by Russian actors to manipulate U.S. public opinion, including through the use of fake social media accounts. He also sounded the alarm about potential attacks on U.S. infrastruc­ture or the financial system. The Homeland Security Department and FBI “in coordinati­on with internatio­nal partners — have detected Russian government actors targeting government and businesses in the energy, nuclear, water, aviation and critical manufactur­ing sectors,” Coats said. And on Monday, Coats renewed his warning of Russian interferen­ce. “We have been clear in our assessment­s of Russian meddling in the 2016 election and their ongoing, pervasive efforts to undermine our democracy,” he said. The muddied waters have deepened critics’ concerns that Trump is not taking seriously enough threats to the U.S. electoral system. “Every one of our intelligen­ce agencies — those who are actually led by appointees of President Trump — have said that not only did Russia engage actively in trying to undermine the elections of 2016 against Secretary Clinton and for now-President Trump, but that they are continuing to do so,” Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., said on MSNBC. “It is appalling that the president cannot seem to stand up to Vladimir Putin.” Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., said on Twitter that there is a “BIG discrepanc­y” between Trump’s statement at Wednesday’s Cabinet meeting and the warning by Coats. “It’s imperative we get to the bottom of what is going on so we can be prepared to protect ourselves in advance of the 2018 elections,” Graham said. “My personal view: the Russians are at [it] again.” Graham said ignoring the threat posed by the Russians is “political malpractic­e” if the threat is real. “I believe it’s real,” he said. Graham added, “If he is wrong, and the intelligen­ce community is right and we get attacked because we didn’t prepare ourselves, that is a terrible legacy for him.” Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., the chairman of the Intelligen­ce Committee, said he had no reason to doubt the warnings from intelligen­ce agencies about November’s midterm elections. “He ought to look at the intelligen­ce,” Burr said of Trump. In an interview with the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette on Wednesday, Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., said he believes Russia is targeting the U.S. elections this year. “I have no doubt and that’s based on a long pattern of Russian interferen­ce in western democracy in general and American democracy in particular,” he said. “The CIA has since declassifi­ed documents from decades ago when Russia attempted to influence public opinion in America on things like intermedia­te range cruise missiles. This is simply what Russia does and it has done so for decades.” Asked whether he believes Trump understand­s that Russia is a threat to the U.S., Cotton said, “Yes. And under the Trump administra­tion, our policy on Russia is much tougher than it’s been in previous years. So, for instance, we have some of the toughest sanctions imposed on Russia; we have provided weapons to Ukraine that were requested but denied in [President Barack Obama’s] administra­tion; we have bombed his main Middle Eastern client twice, [Syrian President] Bashar al-Assad; we have convinced our NATO defense partners to spend more on our common defense; we are producing more American oil and gas, which is a direct hit on his main source of revenue, so in many ways our Russia policy is much tougher than it’s been in recent years.”

TRUMP ON TWITTER

Trump faced withering criticism earlier this week after he seemed to side with Putin over the U.S. intelligen­ce community over Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 election. On Tuesday, Trump sought to contain the damage by delivering a statement in which he said he accepts the U.S. intelligen­ce community’s assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 election, but added that there “could be other people also.” In Tuesday’s remarks, Trump said he had misspoken when he said of the culprit that interfered, “I don’t see any reason why it would be” Russia. Trump asserted that he had misspoken by saying “would” instead of “wouldn’t.” “The sentence should have been, ‘I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia.’ Sort of a double negative,” Trump told reporters. After his remarks at Wednesday’s Cabinet meeting, Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., suggested that Trump needed to do another round of damage control. “Mr. President. Walk this back too,” Schumer wrote on Twitter. Other Democrats mocked Trump and suggested something nefarious was behind his statement. “What world is Trump living in?” Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., wrote on Twitter. “Does he not understand what’s going on? Is he being blackmaile­d because the Russians have compromisi­ng informatio­n on him? Or is he sympatheti­c to Putin’s style of authoritar­ianism?” Members of Congress have been working on legislatio­n aimed at deterring future interferen­ce in U.S. elections. Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., introduced bipartisan legislatio­n in January that would mandate sanctions and other punishment­s for any foreign actor that is found to have attempted to undermine U.S. elections in the future. “There is no reason to think this meddling will be an isolated incident,” Rubio and Van Hollen wrote in a Washington Post op-ed on the measure. “In fact, we expect the threat will grow in future years.” Sanders called the legislatio­n a “hypothetic­al” and declined to say whether the president would support it. Earlier Wednesday, Trump took to Twitter to say that his widely panned news conference after his meeting with Putin was appreciate­d by “many people at the higher ends of intelligen­ce.” “Putin and I discussed many important subjects at our earlier meeting,” Trump wrote. “We got along well which truly bothered many haters who wanted to see a boxing match. Big results will come!” In a subsequent tweet Wednesday, Trump said that a meeting with NATO allies in Brussels last week was an “acknowledg­ed triumph” and that his summit with Putin “may prove to be, in the long run, an even greater success.” Trump said Russia agreed to help with North Korea and claimed that the “process is moving along.” “Big benefits and exciting future for North Korea at end of process!” Trump wrote. Trump returned to the subject of his relationsh­ip with Putin later Wednesday morning, asserting that some people would rather go to war than see him get along well with Putin. “It’s called Trump Derangemen­t Syndrome!” the president wrote on Twitter, borrowing a line from Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who was one of his most vocal defenders in the wake of the Helsinki summit. In recent days, Paul has called those who questioned Trump’s efforts to build a relationsh­ip with Putin “unhinged” and “crazy.” White House counselor Kellyanne Conway brushed off suggestion­s by reporters at the White House that Trump’s tweets amounted to a change in posture from comments the president made Tuesday. She said he and Putin discussed “a range of issues” besides election interferen­ce and that the president is hopeful he can work with Russia on several fronts.

 ?? AP/PABLO MARTINEZ MONSIVAIS ?? President Donald Trump on Wednesday again defended his handling of Russia, saying during a Cabinet meeting that no president before him had taken a tougher stance.
AP/PABLO MARTINEZ MONSIVAIS President Donald Trump on Wednesday again defended his handling of Russia, saying during a Cabinet meeting that no president before him had taken a tougher stance.
 ??  ?? Coats
Coats
 ??  ?? Cotton
Cotton
 ??  ?? Schumer
Schumer
 ??  ?? Sanders
Sanders
 ??  ?? Paul
Paul

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States