Old rule causing ‘crazy’ penalties

The NFL is getting roughed up over its amplified enforcement of roughing-the-passer penalties that has generated head-scratching calls — and a season-ending injury to a defender trying to comply with the league’s mandate not to land fully on the quarterback.

In the offseason, NFL owners asked the league’s competition committee to better protect their prized quarterbacks after Minnesota Vikings linebacker Anthony Barr broke Green Bay Packers star Aaron Rodgers’ collarbone in 2017.

So the league dusted off a rarely invoked 24-year-old rule that outlaws defenders from landing on the quarterback with more than half of their body weight.

“It helps me out because I’m a quarterback,” said Deshaun Watson of the Houston Texans. “But some of the calls are just kind of crazy.”

So inconsistent, in fact, that Packers linebacker Clay Matthews, whose been whistled three times, suggested the league has gone soft. He argued that what constitutes a clean hit is anybody’s guess nowadays.

Defenders who are only allowed to target a strike zone basically consisting of the torso now must also concern themselves with breaking the quarterback’s fall. Or at least doing a “gator roll” where they spin the QB as they tumble to the turf.

The gator roll is “an unnatural move when you are trying to tackle a big guy” like Ben Roethlisberger or

Andrew Luck, said Cincinnati Bengals defensive coordinator Teryl Austin. “They will shrug you off.”

Denver Broncos linebacker Shane Ray said the gator roll isn’t even an option much of the time.

“Sometimes you’re at an awkward angle or you might be pushed into him,” Ray said. “It’s chaotic in there when you’ve got all these bodies flying around.”

There have been 34 roughing-the-passer calls so far. While that works out to just one flag for every 100 pass attempts, it represents a massive increase over previous years. There were 16 such penalties through three weeks last season and 20 the year before that.

“The lack of consistency and clarity is why “I don’t like the rule,” said Fox’s Troy Aikman, whose Hall of Fame career was cut short by the battering he took during a 12year stint as Dallas Cowboys quarterback.

“I think the league overreacted, and I think they will continue to look at it with the controversy that’s been created,” Aikman said, adding the strict interpretation of the 1995 rule “changes the outcome of games and ultimately will cost some coaches their jobs.”

There’s only been a handful of flags, meanwhile, for players lowering their helmet, another point of emphasis, showing that players, coaches and officials have all adjusted accordingly to that rule change.

Two people with knowledge of the agenda told The Associated Press that in the regularly scheduled competition committee conference call next week, the roughing-the-passer calls will be discussed. While neither anticipates a change in the rules themselves, it’s possible a de-emphasizing of the “full weight” portion of the rule could occur.

That point of emphasis this year has led to all kinds of contentious calls, none more prominent than Matthews’ seemingly legal hit in Week 2 that wiped out a clinching interception of Kirk Cousins, who subsequently rallied the Vikings to a 29-29 tie.

“Roughing the Passer calls are absolutely out of control,” Texans star defender J.J. Watt tweeted during the Pittsburgh Steelers-Tampa Bay Buccaneers Monday night game that featured four such flags.

Although Matthews’ hit on Cousins wasn’t deemed a body weight violation, the league’s emphasis on roughing calls clearly played a role in referee Tony Corrente ruling that when Matthews “hit the quarterback, he lifted him and drove him into the ground.”

The last two men who served as the NFL’s head of officiating — Mike Pereira and Dan Blandino — said the league went too far in emphasizing roughing the quarterback and will back off soon because officials are throwing too many flags on plays where the QB isn’t even in danger of getting hurt.

“I think we all have felt like it has gone a little too far,” said Pereira, now an analyst for Fox Sports.

Pereira said the NFL could tamp down the furor over the rule by having officials only throw flags when defenders lift the quarterback and drive him into the ground — although he disagrees that’s what Matthews did to Cousins.

“We all are pretty much in agreement the Clay Matthews hit on Kirk Cousins really shouldn’t be a foul, and I believe that’s what the competition committee believes,” Pereira said. “How literal do we need to interpret a rule?”

Former NFL referee Terry McAulay, now an analyst for NBC, notes the focal point needs to be on whether the defender’s hit included “unnecessary” actions. He refers to a graphic of the rule used on Sunday night’s Patriots-Lions telecast.

“We’ve highlighted a couple of words. One is the word ‘unnecessarily,’ and it says a defender should not unnecessarily land on the quarterback,” McAulay explained. “There is nothing about this play [by Matthews on Alex Smith] that is unnecessary. He’s coming off a block and he makes a legal form tackle, and he just happens to end up on top of the quarterback.”

The graphic also notes “strive to wrap up.”

“That tells me that it needs to be avoidable. Well, there’s nothing unavoidable about this play,” McAulay said. “It just shouldn’t be a foul. I understand technically that it is by rule.”

Broncos star Von Miller, who leads the league with 871/2 sacks since his rookie year in 2011, said he’s not sure how he’s supposed to tackle the quarterback anymore, so he’ll just stick with his signature move.

“I like going for the ball,” said Miller.

Because going for the sack is becoming as perilous for the pass rusher as it is for the quarterback.

“I think the league overreacted, and I think they will continue to look at it with the controversy that’s been created.” — Former NFL quarterback Troy

Aikman