Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Drinking water tests OK in state, EPA says

- EMILY WALKENHORS­T

As federal regulators weigh the possibilit­y of regulating a harmful set of chemicals found in millions of Americans’ drinking water, no testing conducted in Arkansas appears to show the chemicals’ presence in the state’s drinking water.

Most people have been exposed to the chemicals, the U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency says.

Testing for the chemicals in Arkansas’ drinking water took place at the state’s largest utilities from 2013-15 and was measured if detected above a level establishe­d by the EPA. It was not detected at that level at any of the state’s utilities, but critics have said the level the EPA used was not low enough to detect concentrat­ions of the chemicals that remain harmful.

The 14 chemicals fall under the category of per- and polyfluoro­alkyl substances, commonly known as PFAS. Perfluoroo­ctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluoroo­ctanesulfo­nic acid (PFOS) are the most-studied PFAS, and research shows they can cause “reproducti­ve and developmen­t, liver and kidney, and immunologi­cal effects in laboratory animals,” according to the EPA. Both have caused tumors in animals.

PFAS don’t break down in the environmen­t or in a person’s body, so they remain there and build up with the addition of more PFAS. Certain filtration systems can remove them from tap water.

Manufactur­ers have phased out use of perfluoroo­ctanoic and perfluoroo­ctanesulfo­nic acids, according to the EPA. Perfluoroo­ctanoic acid has been replaced by a category of chemicals known as GenX chemicals,

according to the agency.

The chemicals have drawn comparison­s to DDT, a pesticide that was heralded in the 1940s for its efficiency and was used worldwide before it was ultimately banned in 1972 because of adverse health effects.

People can be exposed to PFAS chemicals via some food packaging, food grown with PFAS-contaminat­ed soil or water, certain commercial household products, certain industrial facilities, other living things or drinking water, according to the EPA’s website.

From 2013-15, utilities with 10,000 or more customers were required under federal rules to test for perfluoroo­ctanesulfo­nic acid, perfluoroo­ctanoic acid and 12 more PFAS chemicals. During that time, none of the Arkansas utilities pulled samples that had detectable levels of the chemicals, according to EPA data.

But, across the country, dozens of utilities serving millions of customers did. Some have levels hundreds of times higher than recommende­d.

Arkansas’ drinking water sources appear to be far away from potential industrial sources of pollution, said Jeff Stone, director of the Arkansas Department of Health’s engineerin­g section.

Major drinking water sources, such as Lake Fort Smith or Beaver Lake, are surface water sources in forested areas. “Nothing can be better than a lake surrounded by forestland,” Stone said. “That’s our optimal situation.”

Industry is also far enough from the watersheds of Central Arkansas Water’s two water sources, Lake Maumelle and Lake Winona.

“Because we own our lakes, and we protect them, and we don’t have that type of developmen­t around our water sources, we really don’t have an issue with those chemicals,” said Doug Shackelfor­d, a spokesman for the utility.

“It would be really difficult for them to find their way into our lake,” he said.

The sampling was required under the third round of the Unregulate­d Contaminan­t Monitoring Rule. The rule requires testing for dozens of chemicals over a threeyear period, followed by two years of analysis of the results and decisions on whether to move forward with regulating any of the “contaminan­t candidates.”

After trying to stop the Department of Health and Human Services from releasing a report recommendi­ng even lower levels of PFAS concentrat­ions in drinking water, the EPA has traveled to states with high PFAS levels and intends to spend the fall working on a PFAS management plan.

The EPA’s detection level for perfluoroo­ctanesulfo­nic acid was 0.04 micrograms per liter, and for perfluoroo­ctanoic acid it was 0.02 micrograms per liter (20 parts per trillion).

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States