Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Open the books!

Let public see county fiscal data

- MAVUTO KALULU Mavuto Kalulu is a policy analyst at the Arkansas Center for Research in Economics at the University of Central Arkansas in Conway. The views expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessaril­y reflect those of the Unive

Imagine a test with a possible 100 points. Now imagine a big red 7 with a circle around it at the top of that test. This is how Arkansas scores on fiscal transparen­cy at the county level.

On Sept. 10, the Arkansas Center for Research in Economics (ACRE) released a report titled “Access Arkansas: County-Level Web Transparen­cy.” The report provides a clear look at the status of county government Web transparen­cy in Arkansas. It breaks down transparen­cy into three different types, one of which is fiscal transparen­cy. And Arkansans have a lot of work to do to bring that grade up.

How does the report define fiscal transparen­cy, and why should county officials and Arkansans care about it?

Fiscal transparen­cy is the disclosure of financial informatio­n such as budgets, audits and taxes. When county government­s publish complete and reliable financial informatio­n online, citizens have greater opportunit­y to evaluate how their elected officials plan to spend their tax dollars and how well they manage and use public resources. A survey of transparen­cy research titled “25 Years of Research: Evidence and Future Directions” published in the Journal of Public Administra­tion shows that the benefits include instilling fiscal discipline and reducing corruption.

Publishing fiscal informatio­n online also reduces costs that arise when people request informatio­n through the Freedom of Informatio­n Act. The State Office of Education and the Tax Commission in Utah save about $15,000 a year by being proactive in publishing public informatio­n and reducing the number of requests.

How do Arkansas counties fare with regards to fiscal transparen­cy?

Despite the benefits of fiscal transparen­cy, ACRE’s assessment revealed a serious deficiency. Forty-nine counties in Arkansas do not have any financial informatio­n online. The rest of the counties publish some financial informatio­n. For example, only eight counties in Arkansas publish current budgets online. Only nine counties publish previous years’ budgets.

The fiscal transparen­cy score is calculated on a 0 to 1 scale. The average score for all Arkansas counties is 0.072, an indication that Arkansas counties are not fiscally transparen­t. That’s a 7 out of 100! The top 10 performing counties in fiscal transparen­cy, in order, are Washington, Baxter, Pulaski, Faulkner, Carroll, Craighead, Van Buren, Benton, Garland and Sevier.

How then can county officials promote fiscal transparen­cy at county level government­s in Arkansas?

First, county officials need to choose a place where this informatio­n is easily accessible. Fiscal data such as budgets and audits are required by law so these documents already exist. Now they just need to be somewhere citizens can find them! Currently, not all counties in Arkansas have their own websites. Forty out of the 75 counties have stand-alone websites. Thirty-five counties have some presence on the Arkansas.gov Web platform, but only political transparen­cy informatio­n like quorum court meeting places, times, agendas and minutes is published—not fiscal informatio­n. The Arkansas.gov platform may be a good option for counties that do not have the resources to own and maintain their own website.

Second, county officials need to populate their websites with this informatio­n. The ACRE report provides the fiscal informatio­n that would be helpful for constituen­ts, such as current and archived budgets, current and archived financial statements, county fees, and taxes. These are selected based on what experts have said are the most important components of fiscal transparen­cy.

Third, the Legislatur­e can play a role as well. Counties are already required by state law to publish financial informatio­n once a year in a local newspaper or a newspaper with the most circulatio­n. It should be updated to include a requiremen­t to publish this informatio­n online as well. The number of people that are accessing informatio­n through the Web is growing and legislator­s should recognize that. A 2018 Pew Research Center article, “Internet/Broadband Fact Sheet,” reports that the percentage of people accessing informatio­n online has grown from 52 percent in 2000 to 89 percent in 2018.

One concern about Web transparen­cy is that rural areas may not have access to high-speed Internet. But Arkansas has made noticeable progress in this regard. According to a Federal Communicat­ions Commission 2018 Broadband Deployment Report, high-speed Internet capabiliti­es in rural Arkansas increased to 58 percent in 2016, up from 16 percent in 2013.

This will require effort on the part of county officials, but it’s worth it.

There is a real opportunit­y for today’s leaders to be proactive in providing timely and relevant informatio­n to their constituen­ts. I hope they take it and continue to earn their constituen­ts’ trust.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States