Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Cosmetolog­y students tangled in debt

-

When she was in cosmetolog­y school, Tracy Lozano had a love-hate relationsh­ip with weekday mornings. Those pre-dawn moments were the only time she saw her infant daughter awake, and she savored them. When the time came to hand the baby to her mother, she said recently, she would stifle her tears, letting them roll only when she had closed the door behind her.

She would put on her game face when she pulled into the parking lot of the Iowa School of Beauty, just outside Des Moines. From what Lozano could tell, a cosmetolog­y license was a realistic way to ensure a better life, and she was willing to make sacrifices. While also working nights at a Pizza Hut, she borrowed $21,000 to cover tuition and salon supplies and put in eighthour days at the school for the better part of a year.

The amount of time Lozano spent learning to give haircuts, manicures and facials was enormous, but the requiremen­t was set by the state, and she didn’t much question it. She was determined to earn enough money to move out of her mother’s house. Only a few weeks after getting her cosmetolog­y license in 2005, she was hired at a Great Clips outlet.

The job, though, paid just $9 an hour, which meant that her days double-shifting at Pizza Hut weren’t over. Even with tips, Lozano didn’t earn more than $25,000 in any of her first few years as a cosmetolog­ist. For years, she relied on food stamps and health insurance from the state. She couldn’t cover living expenses and keep chipping away at her loan payments. Thirteen years after graduating, she still owes more than $8,000.

What Lozano didn’t know was that the state-regulated school system she had put her faith in relies on a business model in which the drive for revenue often trumps students’ educationa­l needs. For-profit schools dominate the cosmetolog­y training world and reap money from taxpayers, students and salon customers. They have beaten back attempts to create cheaper alternativ­es, even while miring their students in debt. In Iowa in particular, the companies charge steep prices — nearly $20,000 on average for a cosmetolog­y certificat­e, equivalent to the cost of a two-year community-college degree twice over — and they have fought to keep the required number of school hours higher than anywhere else in the country.

Each state sets its own standards. Most require 1,500 hours, and some, like New York and Massachuse­tts, require only 1,000. Iowa requires 2,100 — that’s a full year’s worth of 40-hour workweeks, plus an extra 20. By comparison, people can become emergency medical technician­s in the state after 132 hours at a community college. Put another way: An Iowa cosmetolog­ist who has a heart attack can have her life saved by a medic with onesixteen­th her training.

There’s little evidence that spending more hours in school leads to higher wages. Nor is there proof that extra hours result in improved public safety. But one relationsh­ip is clear: The more hours that students are forced to be in school, the more debt they accrue. Among cosmetolog­y programs across the nation, Iowa’s had the fourth-highest median student debt in 2014, according to federal data.

Most stylists in Iowa are making $10 an hour even though they love the job but are struggling to pay off student loans.

The issue is national. More than 177,000 people enroll in for-profit beauty schools across the United States each year, which on average charge more than $17,000 for tuition, fees and supplies to earn a cosmetolog­y certificat­e.

Across the Iowa border, in Fremont, Neb., Ashley Sandoval makes $10.50 an hour at another Great Clips location. In the five years since she graduated from cosmetolog­y school, she said, interest has ballooned her debt from $22,000 to $29,000. “I’ll be paying it off for the rest of my life,” Sandoval said.

The Iowa Cosmetolog­y School Associatio­n, which acts on behalf of several of the 13 companies that own schools in the state, would not make a representa­tive available for an interview. But the associatio­n did provide written responses to questions through its lobbyist, Threase Harms. The group said that its primary concern was successful­ly preparing students, not making money, and that difference­s in state regulation­s made comparing hours difficult. The associatio­n also doesn’t see the crippling student debt as the schools’ fault, citing the fact that students are allowed to take out more in loans than is necessary to cover educationa­l expenses. “We have students graduating with minimal debt because they made wise choices,” the associatio­n said.

Cosmetolog­y schools have a unique business model in the for-profit school world. They have two main streams of revenue. The first comes from students, often in the form of taxpayer-funded grants and loans to pay for the tuition. Cosmetolog­y schools took in nearly $1.2 billion in federal grants and loans during the 2015-16 school year.

The second stream is the salon work the students do while in school. They spend some time in classrooms learning about, for example, chemicals and how to sanitize the work space, but once they’ve hit a certain number of hours, they start working on real clients in salons run by the schools. In full-time programs, going to school becomes a fulltime job, where students clock in and out for seven- or eighthour shifts.

The total number of required hours varies, but all states require some amount of practice with paying customers. In Iowa, students spend 715 hours in the classroom and 1,385 hours on the floor.

Prices for these salon services — which include haircuts, manicures, facials and, at some schools, massages — are typically set below market rates to attract customers. The salons also sell shampoo, conditione­r and other beauty products. One Iowa student said he and others had gotten perks (such as trips and special training) if they sold enough products. Another student, who sued a school in Pennsylvan­ia, reported that her grades were partly based on whether she offered salon products to clients.

The schools don’t have to pay students for the services they provide; in fact, the students pay tuition for the hours they work in the salons.

All told, for-profit cosmetolog­y schools nationwide brought in more than $200 million in revenue from their salons in the 2015-16 school year, according to federal statistics. Most schools are small, privately owned entities that do not have to disclose their profits.

“Without the revenue coming from those salons, most of these schools wouldn’t be profitable, or it would be marginal,” said Leon Greenberg, a lawyer in Las Vegas who has examined the financial documents of several schools he unsuccessf­ully sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act. “It’s pretty much ingrained in their business model.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States