Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Filing: Four licenses means four casinos

Gulfside may sue if racing commission adopts rules as proposed, attorney says

- JEANNIE ROBERTS

The Arkansas Racing Commission must issue four casino licenses or be in breach of the state constituti­on, attorneys for a proposed multimilli­on-dollar casino in Pope County said in a document provided Tuesday.

Gulfside Casino Partnershi­p says in the 15-page document that if the proposed-rules draft on governing casino operations in the state is adopted in its current form, the company has a right to sue in circuit court.

“As we stated, the intent of Amendment 100 is clear. The state ‘shall’ establish four casinos, including one in Pope County,” said Casey Castleberr­y, Gulfside’s attorney. “If the Racing Commission adopts rules that thwart this explicit purpose, Gulfside will consider its legal options to challenge those rules.”

Scott Hardin, spokesman for the state Department of Finance and Administra­tion, which oversees the Racing Commission, said the commission is unable to comment on litigation “as we allow the courts to resolve it.”

At issue is Rule 2.13 in the 340-page draft of proposed rules. Rule 2.13 essentiall­y invalidate­s endorsemen­ts from Pope County and Russellvil­le officials who, just before leaving office at the end of December, submitted letters of support for the Gulfside proposal to build a 600-room, $254 million hotel and casino in Russellvil­le.

Current officials, who took office Jan. 1, are opposed to a casino there and said they will not endorse the Gulfside proposal.

Amendment 100, overwhelmi­ngly passed by voters in the November general election, allows casino licenses to be issued for Pope and Jefferson counties, as well as two casinos at the race tracks in Hot Springs and West Memphis.

Voters in Pope County rejected the amendment, and many county residents have since vehemently lobbied against a casino license being issued there.

Amendment 100 requires the endorsemen­t of local officials, but does not specify when the letters must be submitted.

On Jan. 10, the Racing Commission voted to amend the proposed Rule 2.13 to allow endorsemen­ts only from sitting officials and only at the time of a casino applicatio­n. No applicatio­ns can be made until the rules are finalized and adopted.

Castleberr­y said in Gulfside’s response that the change directly contradict­s a decision made by the Racing Commission at its Dec. 26 meeting to accept a Nov. 19 letter from then-Jefferson County County Judge Booker T. Clemons in support of a proposal from Downstream Developmen­t Authority to build a casino there.

Clemons had been elected to finish the term of former County Judge Hank Wilkins, who resigned amid controvers­y in March.

Clemons left office in December.

In that meeting, Racing Commission attorney Byron Freeland called attention to Rule 2.13 and advised the commission that Clemons’ endorsemen­t met the mandate of Amendment 100.

The commission passed the text of Rule 2.13, which at the time, stated that letters of support and resolution­s by the Quorum Court should be dated after the effective date of the amendment, which was Nov. 14.

Freeland told an Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reporter after that meeting that under the proposed rule, Clemons’ letter would satisfy the requiremen­t for local support.

Castleberr­y said in the document that because Amendment 100 uses the language of “shall,” the Racing Commission is required to issue four licenses for casinos in the state, one of which “must be located in Pope County.”

He pointed to the 1986 case of Loyd V. Knight, in which the state Supreme Court said, “The word ‘shall’ when used in a statute means that the legislatur­e intended mandatory compliance with the statute unless such an interpreta­tion would lead to an absurdity.”

“Any rule promulgate­d by the Racing Commission which results in the issuance of less than four casino licenses is in direct conflict with Amendment 100 and is, therefore, unconstitu­tional,” Castleberr­y wrote in the document.

Castleberr­y also cited the 2006 case of the Department of Human Services and Child Welfare Agency Review Board v. Howard in which the Review Board passed a rule that prohibited a person from serving as a foster parent if any member of the person’s household was homosexual.

In that case, the state Supreme Court said the rule change was in opposition to the law and outside of the Review Board’s authority.

The requiremen­ts detailed in Amendment 100 — such as the applicatio­n fee and providing detailed informatio­n about the casino operators — cannot be legally changed or added to, Castleberr­y said in the document.

“The Racing Commission has no discretion on these points. The Racing Commission is empowered to decide which applicant is entitled to receive a casino license. However, when presented with at least one applicant who meets the minimum requiremen­ts set out by Amendment 100, it cannot decide that no applicant may receive a license,” Castleberr­y said. “As in Howard, the proposed Rule 2.13 is not intended to effectuate the agency’s mission, but, rather, to exclude a qualified applicant from receiving a license. Thus, Rule 2.13 is constituti­onally infirm.”

Castleberr­y also suggested that the proposed rules be modified to allow for a full refund of the applicatio­n fee — proposed to be $250,000 — in the event the applicatio­n is rejected for failure to meet minimum requiremen­ts. Half of the applicatio­n fee should be refunded if the applicant is rejected for any other reason, Castleberr­y said.

Also on Tuesday, Rep. Joe Cloud along with Sen. Breanne Davis, both Republican­s of Russellvil­le, filed House Bill 1517, which would prohibit the Racing Commission from issuing a Pope County casino license unless an election is held to approve casino gambling there.

If the voters approve the measure and such an election is held, the letters of support required by Amendment 100 must come from local officials current at the time and be submitted at the time of the applicatio­n, HB1517 says.

HB1517 claims the attempt to amend Amendment 100 is allowable under Arkansas Constituti­on Article 5, which means “the General Assembly may amend such measures with a two-thirds vote of each house.”

Whether a constituti­onal amendment can legally be changed or clarified by the Legislatur­e is up for debate, Alex Gray, an attorney who helped draft Amendment 100 for the Driving Arkansas Forward ballot committee, said last month.

Anyone offering input on the Racing Commission’s draft of proposed rules can appear in person at a public hearing set for 11 a.m. Thursday in the fifth-floor conference room at 1515 W. Seventh St. in Little Rock.

At that time, the commission can vote to adopt, modify or reject the proposed rules, which will then be sent to a legislativ­e committee for approval.

Hardin said that, while not required, the final draft of the rules will be sent to Gov. Asa Hutchinson for review.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States