Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Yale professor refutes popular CWD theory

- BRYAN HENDRICKS

Deer hunters flooded my inbox last week asking if I had heard the great news that Dr. Frank Bastian has developed a cure for chronic wasting disease.

The “news” is actually a couple of years old and illuminate­s Bastian’s claims of having isolated the cause of chronic wasting disease, or CWD, a fatal neurologic disorder that destroys the central nervous systems of deer, elk and moose.

Chronic wasting disease is one of the diseases known collective­ly as transmissi­ble spongiform encephalop­athies, or TSEs, a group of rare degenerati­ve brain disorders that can affect humans and animals. Their defining characteri­stic is misfolded proteins that destroy a victim’s brain. These proteins are called “prions,” a word coined by Nobel laureate Stanley Prusiner. Prion is short for “proteinace­ous infectious particle.”

Bastian, a professor of neuropatho­logy at Louisiana State University, specialize­s in scrapie, a TSE that affects sheep.

I interviewe­d Bastian in 2002 for an article in North American Hunter in which he linked scrapie and chronic wasting disease with spiroplasm­a bacteria that were transmitte­d by hay mites. Prions, he insisted, did not cause scrapie or CWD, but were symptomati­c of spiroplasm­a infection. In that 2002 article, Bastian also claimed to have eliminated scrapie in test animals with the antibiotic tetracycli­ne.

Other highly credential­ed critics also dispute prion orthodoxy, including Dr. Laura Manuelidis, professor of neuropatho­logy in the Department of Surgery at Yale. She said the theory of prion (PrP) infectivit­y collapses under classical scientific scrutiny.

She said her rejection of the prion as the causative agent for CWD is essentiall­y “Biology 101.” The prion is non-nucleic and has no ability to encode the very different agent strains documented in human Creutzfeld­t-Jakob disease, scrapie, epidemic “mad cow” disease and CWD.

“Proteins don’t replicate,” Manuelidis said. “PrP misfolds late in disease but does not manufactur­e millions of new copies of itself, unlike TSE infectious agents.

Agent replicatio­n was establishe­d in the 1940s, Manuelidis said.

“Where is the reproducib­le proof that PrP or any other protein itself can be infectious?” Manuelidis asked. “Thousands of experiment­s from various labs have not been able to reproduce any infectivit­y for recombinan­t PrP itself, as claimed by Prusiner’s report in a publicized Science report.”

Most importantl­y, highly infectious, virus-sized particles smaller than 20 nanometers with no detectable PrP have been demonstrat­ed, Manuelidis said.

Conversely, all highly infectious “isolates” contain appreciabl­e genomic-length nucleic acids, Manuelidis said. These are required for infection.

“Nuclease treatment destroys these nucleic acids and simultaneo­usly destroys infectivit­y,” Manuelidis said. “What is the specific sequence of that essential genome? No one knows, and few people have looked, but empirical evidence points to a protected viral genome of 0.5-3,000nt.”

Public confusion arises partly from the mispercept­ion that one can transmit disease, Manuelidis said. Infectious agents cause disease.

“Abnormal PrP is an endstage pathologic product, whereas the stealth infectious agent replicates a million-fold before pathologic PrP is detectable,” Manuelidis said. “On the other hand, PrP is a good marker of TSE disease and is a required host protein for the effective replicatio­n of the agent. Host susceptibi­lity to infection always rests on specific host proteins to support their replicativ­e life cycle.”

Much of the scientific community is so wholly invested in the theory of infectious prions that it ignores contradict­ory evidence.

“There is a great belief and investment in prions, and this has stymied anyone wanting to systematic­ally investigat­e different alternativ­es,” Manuelidis said.

In 2013, Manuelidis published a paper titled, Infectious particles, stress and induced prion amyloids — a unifying perspectiv­e. She noted that certain TSEs have been controlled by modifying the environmen­t. For example, a variant called “kuru” disappeare­d with the cessation of ritualisti­c cannibalis­m in a specific New Guinea tribe. It has not reappeared “spontaneou­sly,” violating a central tenet of the prion theory, Manuelidis said.

Epidemic mad cow disease was greatly reduced by removing contaminat­ed feed in the form of protein cakes fortified with brain tissue harvested from scrapie-infected sheep.

“This is a classic infectious disease pattern, but many prion proponents seem to have little knowledge of classic infectious diseases, including their latent sequestrat­ion for years in myeloid cells and lymph nodes, which is also the hide-out place for TSE agents,” Manuelidis said.

“They don’t think in terms of those fundamenta­l establishe­d principles. They ignore facts that do not fit their belief. Scientific truth, however, is not determined by popular vote or decree.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States