Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Is the UK still Europe?

- Victor Davis Hanson —––––– –––––— Victor Davis Hanson is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institutio­n, Stanford University.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson is desperate to translate the British public’s June 2016 vote to leave the European Union into a concrete Brexit.

But the real issue is far older and more important than whether 52 percent of Britain finally became understand­ably aggrieved by the increasing­ly anti-democratic and German-controlled European Union.

England is an island. Historical­ly, politicall­y and linguistic­ally, it was never permanentl­y or fully integrated into European culture and traditions.

The story of Britain has mostly been about conflict with France, Germany or Spain. The pre-eminence of the Royal Navy, in the defiant spirit of its sea lords, ensured that European dictators from Napoleon to Hitler could never set foot on British soil.

As British admiral John Jervis reassured his superiors in 1801 amidst rumors of an impending Napoleonic invasion, “I do not say, my lords, that the French will not come. I say only they will not come by sea.”

Britain’s sea power, imperialis­m, parliament­ary government and majority Protestant religion set it apart from its European neighbors—and not just because of its geographic­al isolation.

The 18th-century British and Scottish Enlightenm­ent of Edmund Burke, David Hume, John Locke and Adam Smith emphasized individual­ism, freedom and liberty far more than the government-enforced equality of result that was favored by French Enlightenm­ent thinkers such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau. It is no accident that the American Revolution was founded on the idea of individual freedom and liberty, unlike the later French Revolution’s violent effort to redistribu­te income and deprive “enemies of the people” of their rights and even their lives.

France produced Napoleon, Italy had Mussolini, and Germany gave the world Hitler. It is difficult to find in British history a comparable dictatoria­l figure who sought Continenta­l domination.

The British were often no saints. They controlled their global empire by both persuasion and brutal force.

But even British imperialis­m was of a different sort than Belgian, French, German, Portuguese or Spanish colonialis­m. Former British colonies America, Australia, Canada, India and New Zealand have long been democratic, while much of Latin America, to take one example, has not until recently.

In World War I, the British lost nearly 1 million soldiers trying to save France and Belgium. In World War II, England was the only nation to fight the Axis for the entirety of the war (from September 1939 to September 1945), the only Allied power to fight the Axis completely alone (for about a year from mid-1940 to mid-1941), and the only major Allied power to

have gone to war without having been directly attacked. (It came to the aid of its ally Poland.)

Historical­ly, Britain has looked more upon the seas and the New World than eastward to Europe. In that transatlan­tic sense, a Canadian or American typically had more in common with an Englander than did a German or Greek.

Over the last 30 years, the British nearly forgot that fact as they merged into the European Union and pledged to adopt European values in a shared trajectory to a supposed utopia.

To the degree that England remained somewhat suspicious of EU continenta­lism by rejecting the euro and not embracing European socialism, the country thrived. But when Britain followed the German example of open borders, reversed the market reforms of Margaret Thatcher, and adopted the pacifism and energy fantasies of the EU, it stagnated.

Johnson’s efforts as the new prime minister ostensibly are to carry out the will of the British people as voiced in 2016, against the wishes of the European Union apparat and most of the British establishm­ent. But after hundreds of years of rugged independen­ce, will Britain finally merge into Europe, or will it retain its singular culture and grow closer to the English-speaking countries it once founded—which are doing better than most of the members of the increasing­ly regulated and anti-democratic European Union?

Europe is alarmingly unarmed. Most NATO members refuse to make their promised investment­s in defense. Negative interest rates are becoming normal in Europe. Unemployme­nt remains high in tightly regulated labor markets.

Southern European countries can never fully repay their loans from German banks. The dissident Visegrad Group, comprised of the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, seeks to create a mini-alliance inside the EU that promotes secure borders, legal immigratio­n only, nuclear power, and traditiona­l values and Christiani­ty.

Britain has a last chance to re-embrace the free-market democratic world that it once helped to create— and distance itself from the creeping statism it once opposed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States