Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Prescripti­on-plan finder confusing to some

- RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR

WASHINGTON — Medicare’s revamped prescripti­on-plan finder can steer unwitting senior citizens to coverage that costs much more than they need to pay, according to people who help with sign-ups as well as program experts.

Serving some 60 million Medicare recipients, the plan finder is the most commonly used tool on Medicare.gov and just got its first major update in a decade. President Donald Trump’s administra­tion has hailed the new version and Medicare Administra­tor Seema Verma says it will empower beneficiar­ies to take advantage of their coverage options.

But as open enrollment goes into the homestretc­h Thanksgivi­ng week, critics say the new tool can create confusion by obscuring outof-pocket costs that people should factor into their decisions.

“I want to make sure people are given the most accurate informatio­n and they’re making the best decision — because they are the ones stuck with it,” said Ann Kayrish, senior program manager for Medicare at the National Council on Aging, a nonpartisa­n organizati­on that advocates for senior citizens and provides community services.

Government programs mixing health care and technology have faced struggles. Despite billions spent to subsidize electronic medical records, getting different systems to communicat­e remains a challenge. President Barack Obama’s administra­tion’s debut of healthcare.gov resulted in a debacle when the website froze up the first day.

The leading Democrat on the Senate Aging Committee said he’s hearing concerns from constituen­ts and organizati­ons that assist Medicare beneficiar­ies. Pennsylvan­ia Sen. Bob Casey said he will ask Medicare to grant senior citizens who’ve had problems a second chance to sign up, called a “special enrollment period.”

“It’s obviously an effort that needs a lot more work to meet the legitimate expectatio­ns of seniors,” said Casey. “Especially when you launch something new, [it] can go awry. People steered in the wrong direction should get a measure of fairness.”

The Medicare plan finder’s issue stems from a significan­t change the agency made for 2020.

The plan with the lowest premium now gets automatica­lly placed on top, with the monthly premium displayed in large font.

Medicare’s previous plan finder automatica­lly sorted plans by total cost, not just premiums.

But premiums are only one piece of informatio­n.

When out-of-pocket expenses such as copays are factored in, the plan with the lowest total annual cost is often not the first one shown by the plan finder.

It takes extra work for a Medicare enrollee to discover that.

“If they pick the plan based solely on the premium they are likely getting a plan that could cost them thousands more in a calendar year,” said Christina Reeg of the Ohio Department of Insurance. She heads a program that helps Medicare enrollees find the right plan.

In a statement, Medicare said the monthly premium is a cost that consumers understand and will always be an important decision factor.

But the agency also said total cost paid out-of-pocket is at least equally, if not more important, particular­ly for people who take prescripti­on drugs — as do most senior citizens. Medicare said it’s testing ways to encourage consumers to look at total costs, such as a pop-up.

The agency said it chose to prominentl­y display premiums because user testing showed that’s what consumers are familiar with. The total annual cost is included, but in a smaller font.

That’s puzzling to Kayrish. The lowest premium “doesn’t necessaril­y translate to lowest cost over the year,” she explained.

Consumers using the plan finder first enter their medication­s and dosages. To get it to find plans by lowest total annual cost, they must take a few more steps, Kayrish said.

After the screen displays initial search results, consumers should look for the dropdown menu on the right of the screen. Next, she said, select the feature that lets you re-sort plans by “lowest drug + premium cost.”

A reporter’s sample search on a list of six medication­s for high blood pressure, high cholestero­l and diabetes returned 29 plans in the Washington, D.C., area, topped by a lowest-premium option for $13.20 a month.

But after re-sorting for the lowest total cost, the best deal was a plan with a monthly premium of $25.80.

When out-of-pocket expenses were factored in, the second plan cost about $5,800 less a year than the initial lowest-premium option the plan finder displayed.

Costs can vary so much because plans have different coverage designs and they don’t pay the same prices to drugmakers.

And Kayrish said there’s another issue: The new plan finder can return options that don’t cover all of a patient’s medication­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States