Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Japan pact to stay, South Korea says

- KIM TONG-HYUNG Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Hyung-jin Kim, Mari Yamaguchi and Kaori Hitomi of The Associated Press.

SEOUL, South Korea — In a major policy reversal, South Korea said Friday that it has decided to continue, at least temporaril­y, a 2016 military intelligen­ce-sharing agreement with Japan that it previously said it would terminate amid ongoing tensions over wartime history and trade.

The announceme­nt, made just six hours before the agreement was to expire, followed a strong U.S. push to save the pact, which has been a major symbol of the countries’ threeway security cooperatio­n in the face of North Korea’s nuclear threat and China’s growing influence.

The office of South Korean President Moon Jae-in said it decided to suspend the effect of the three months’ notice it gave in August to terminate the agreement after Tokyo agreed to reopen talks on settling their trade dispute.

But Kim You-geun, deputy director of South Korea’s presidenti­al national security office, said the move was based on the premise that South Korea could end the arrangemen­t at any time, tying it to the outcome of future negotiatio­ns with Japan.

Kim also said South Korea decided to halt a complaint it filed with the World Trade Organizati­on over Japan’s tightened controls on exports of key chemicals that South Korean companies use to make computer chips and displays.

Japan’s Trade Ministry said it decided to resume discussion­s with South Korea on their dispute over the export controls after Seoul informed it of its plan to halt its World Trade Organizati­on action. Yoichi Iida, a Japanese trade official, said Tokyo has no immediate plan to ease the controls.

“Coordinati­on and cooperatio­n between Japan and South Korea, and trilateral cooperatio­n among Japan, the U.S. and South Korea, are extremely important in our response to North Korea,” Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said. “That’s the point we have made repeatedly. I believe South Korea made its decision from such a strategic perspectiv­e.”

South Korean Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-wha said Seoul considered its relations and cooperatio­n with the United States before deciding to extend the agreement with Japan. She said the decision “buys some more time” to settle the trade dispute.

A senior South Korean presidenti­al official, who refused to be named during a background briefing, said he expects the talks with Japanese officials to also include discussion­s on Tokyo’s decision to remove South Korea from a list of favored trading partners, which Seoul wants reversed.

The military agreement is automatica­lly extended every year unless either country notifies the other 90 days in advance of its intention to terminate it, a deadline that fell in August.

Washington had no immediate reaction to Seoul’s announceme­nt.

South Korea’s August declaratio­n that it would terminate the General Security of Military Intelligen­ce Agreement with Japan came shortly after Tokyo removed its neighbor from a “white list” of countries receiving preferenti­al treatment in trade.

South Korea saw Tokyo’s move, which followed the strengthen­ed controls on technology exports to South Korea, as retaliatio­n over political disputes stemming from Japan’s use of Koreans for forced labor before the end of World War II.

But after criticism from Washington, which said Seoul’s decision could hurt the security of its Asian allies and increase risks to U.S. troops stationed there, South Korea said it could continue the military agreement if Japan restores its status as a favored trade partner.

The agreement, which complement­ed a three-way 2014 deal that allowed Seoul and Tokyo to pass informatio­n on North Korea’s nuclear weapons and missiles via Washington, was seen as a major symbol of cooperatio­n in coping with the growing North Korean threat and balancing China’s growing influence.

The intelligen­ce agreement made it easier for South Korea to access informatio­n gathered by Japan’s intelligen­ce satellites, radar, patrol planes and other high-tech systems, which are critical for analyzing North Korean missile tests and submarines.

For Japan, the agreement with South Korea had value because its military sensors are positioned to detect North Korean launches sooner, and also because of informatio­n the country gathers from spies, North Korean defectors and other human sources.

Visiting Seoul last week, U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper said the agreement allows fast and effective informatio­n exchanges between the three countries which would be crucial in times of war. He said friction between the two U.S. allies would only benefit North Korea and China.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States