Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

More time sought for sewer fixes

Fort Smith official notes effects of pandemic, 2019 flooding

- THOMAS SACCENTE

FORT SMITH — The city of Fort Smith is seeking further relief in its efforts to implement required sewer improvemen­ts, despite already receiving an extension earlier this year.

After prompting by Ward 3 City Director Lavon Morton, City Administra­tor Carl Geffken told the Board of Directors during its regular meeting earlier this month that the city — in order to fulfill the requiremen­ts of its federal consent decree — is pursuing additional time because of both the covid-19 pandemic and the 2019 Arkansas River flood.

“We were offered one [year], but considerin­g the length of time for covid and the flood, that hardly counts for the amount of time we’ve spent on both of those crises,” Geffken said.

Geffken said the city knows that the effects of the pandemic will continue for a longer period of time than it originally believed.

Fort Smith officials signed a consent decree in 2015 with the U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency, the Department of Justice and the state. The city agreed to make an estimated $480 million in repairs and upgrades to the wastewater system over the course of 12 years to clear up chronic violations of the federal Clean Water Act. To aid in fulfilling the requiremen­ts of the consent decree, the city raised its sewer rates by 167% from 2015 to 2017.

Fort Smith announced May 8 that the EPA and the Arkansas Division of Environmen­tal Quality had agreed the previous evening that the city had demonstrat­ed that its sewer improvemen­t program will be “inordinate­ly expensive” and qualified for five more years of implementa­tion time on top of the 12 already set forth. They also agreed to grant more flexibilit­y with certain interim deadlines, allowing the city to extend expensive system improvemen­ts over the entirety of the remaining schedule.

Geffken said June 2 that the city would file a notice of formal dispute resolution to continue the process regarding the points it has made concerning affordabil­ity and “the needs to follow through with the fours and fives for the NASSCO rating.”

On June 4, Geffken said the National Associatio­n of Sewer Service Companies offers a pipeline assessment program that provides a standard by which one can assess sewer pipes. It utilizes a rating system of one to five.

City Utility Director Lance McAvoy explained that in this rating system, a one would be “basically new pipe” that has no defects and is properly aligned and put in the ground.

“When you get to a five, you’re dealing with issues that, a collapsed pipe where it’s already broken through and it’s hanging down, that would be an example of a five,” McAvoy said. “That’s the structural. There’s also an O&M, or operations and maintenanc­e, level five that may be that it needs to be cleaned better, or there’s a large root intrusion that you have to remove. So it really kind of tells you the capacity of the pipe to do its job.”

McAvoy said the consent decree states that the city has to come up with a remedial measures plan for all pipe defects rated four or five. The

Department of Justice and the Environmen­tal Protection Agency are stating to the city that the remedial measures plan means it has to replace or fix all fours and fives.

However, McAvoy pointed to Paragraph 18 of the consent decree, which talks about Appendix D of the same document.

“You will rate it, and then you will assess it, and your plan is based on following the guidelines of Appendix D of the consent decree,” McAvoy said. “Appendix D states that if it is a defect of such manner that it causes an SSO [sanitary sewer overflow], or could possibly contribute to an SSO, it needs to be repaired.”

Everything else, McAvoy said, goes into what is called the CMOM — capacity, management, operations, and maintenanc­e — program. This means that the city will revisit pipes that have been rated four or five but that are not causing, contributi­ng to, or may lead to a sanitary sewer overflow on a yet-to-be-determined cycle, then take care of them when funds become available.

The National Associatio­n of Sewer Service Companies certificat­ion also contains a caveat stating that just because a pipe segment or defect is rated a four or a five, it does not mean that it needs to be immediatel­y replaced or fixed, and that “best engineerin­g judgment” shall be used in determinin­g the proper remedial measure, according to McAvoy.

“We could actually have a three defect that, because it relates to an overflow, we need to fix that really quick,” McAvoy said. “It’s not a four or a five, but we need to fix it.

“We need to look at what’s causing the sanitary sewer overflows, address those first, and then go back and look at what do we need to address after that. That’s where the big difference is, is they’re saying, ‘No, if it’s a four or five, you must replace, you must fix.’ We’re saying, ‘No, the CD says we will follow [the] NASSCO rating system, and it also specifical­ly states we will follow the procedure in Appendix D.’”

Geffken also said the city has for several years made the point of affordabil­ity regarding the consent decree. This is based on the fact that the city has raised its sewer rates by 167% since entering into the consent decree, which, according to Geffken, is more than “most, if not all” other cities in the country that are in consent decrees.

“And that, per the requiremen­ts of the consent decree, we feel that we have proven that, should we continue along the path as laid out in the consent decree, that their sewer rates would be more than two-and-a-half percent of median household income, which then triggered the extra five years,” Geffken said.

“And DOJ and EPA felt that we had a difference of opinion on what should be included in those calculatio­ns, but after some work, DOJ and EPA agreed that … we would be over the two-and-a-half percent of median household income, projected.”

Geffken previously told the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette that Fort Smith has been working in good faith on the consent decree, having spent at least $135 million on fulfilling the requiremen­ts over the past five years.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States