Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Twitter, Facebook targets in campaigns

- AMANDA SEITZ AND BARBARA ORTUTAY

CHICAGO — Social media has become the target of dueling attack ads by the campaigns of the sitting president and his election rival. They’re shooting the messenger while giving it lots of money.

President Donald Trump has bought hundreds of messages on Facebook to accuse its competitor, Twitter, of trying to stifle his voice and influence the November election.

Democratic challenger Joe Biden has spent thousands of dollars advertisin­g on Facebook with a message of his own: In dozens of ads on the platform, he’s asked support ers to sign a petition calling on Facebook to remove inaccurate statements, specifical­ly those from Trump.

The major social media companies are navigating a political minefield as they try to minimize domestic misinforma­tion and rein in foreign actors from manipulati­ng their sites as they did in the last presidenti­al election. Their new actions — or in some cases, lack of action — have triggered explosive, partisan responses, ending their glory days as self-described neutral platforms.

Even as the two presidenti­al campaigns dump millions of dollars a week into Facebook and Google ads, both are also using online ads to criticize the tech platforms for their policies. Trump is accusing Twitter and Snapchat of interferin­g in this year’s election. Biden has sent multiple letters to Facebook and attacked the company for policies that allow politician­s, Trump specifical­ly, to freely make false claims on its site. Biden is paying Facebook handsomely to show ads that accuse Facebook of posing a “threat” to democracy.

Meantime, Trump is paying Facebook to run ads trashing the medium he uses like none other, Twitter.

“Twitter is interferin­g in the 2020 Election by attempting to SILENCE your President,” claimed one of nearly 600 ads Trump’s campaign placed on Facebook

It’s “a huge departure from 2016,” said Emerson Brooking, a fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, a Washington think tank. “If you were leading the Trump or Clinton campaign, you weren’t writing letters to Facebook all day long. It wasn’t so much a central campaign issue. Now it seems like it very much is.”

Americans are on high alert about the platforms’ policies after discoverin­g that Russian trolls posted divisive messages, created fake political events and even used rubles to buy Facebook ads intended for U.S. audiences in the 2016 election. Research already shows the Kremlin is at it again.

Facebook and Twitter have banned voting-related misinforma­tion and vowed to identify and shut down inauthenti­c networks of accounts run by domestic or foreign troublemak­ers. Twitter has banned political ads altogether, a decision that a company spokesman told the AP it stands behind. And Facebook, along with Google, began disclosing campaign ad spending while banning non-Americans from buying U.S. political ads.

Facebook didn’t comment for this story.

But calls to deflate big tech’s ballooning power have only grown louder from both Democrats and Republican­s, even though the two parties are targeting different companies for different reasons to rally supporters.

Those politics will no doubt be on full display Wednesday, when four CEOs — Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Google’s Sundar Pichai and Apple’s Tim Cook — testify to a House Judiciary Committee panel as part of a congressio­nal investigat­ion into the tech industry’s dominance.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States