Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Abortion measure’s provisions blocked

Tennessee law included ‘reversal’ claim

- KIMBERLEE KRUESI

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — A federal judge has blocked a Tennessee law that required women undergoing drug-induced abortions be informed the procedure could be reversed.

The statute was about to go into effect Wednesday after the GOP-dominant General Assembly advanced an anti-abortion measure earlier this year. The law included not only the so-called abortion reversal provision, but also a ban on abortions once a fetal heartbeat is detected — about six weeks into pregnancy.

Both portions of that statute are now blocked from being implemente­d as these legal cases make their way through court.

Six states already require doctors to tell women that it may be possible to reverse a medical abortion: Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Utah. In two other states, Oklahoma and North Dakota, these laws are blocked by legal challenges.

Under the Tennessee law, doctors would be required to inform women that drug-induced abortions may be halted halfway. Medical groups say the claim is not backed up by science and there is little informatio­n about the reversal procedure’s safety.

Those who failed to comply with the law would face a Class E felony, punishable by up to six years in prison.

Abortion-rights advocates argue the law is unconstitu­tional because it requires doctors to communicat­e “controvers­ial government-mandated” informatio­n that they otherwise would not relay to their patients.

“Plaintiffs have demonstrat­ed a strong or substantia­l likelihood of success on the merits of their claims that [the law] violates the First Amendment by requiring abortion providers to convey a mandated message that is misleading,” wrote U.S. District Judge William Campbell in his Tuesday night ruling.

However, Campbell held off from weighing in on whether the informatio­n doctors have to provide to their patients regarding drug-induced abortions was accurate. Instead, he said he would make that determinat­ion at the Oct. 13 preliminar­y injunction hearing when experts could testify.

The state’s attorneys have maintained the informatio­n is crucial for women who may change their minds halfway through the procedure. The state also says doctors are free to voice their disagreeme­nt with the state-mandated advisory, which they argue negates any free-speech concerns.

“The temporary restrainin­g order merely preserves the status quo until the district court can hold a preliminar­y injunction hearing,” said Samantha Fisher, spokeswoma­n for the Tennessee attorney general’s office, in an email. “We look forward to presenting evidence at the hearing to support the constituti­onality of the statute.”

“Our patients depend on us for honest, evidence-based care. We’re glad we aren’t forced to deceive them with quackery — at least not yet,” said Rebecca Terrell, executive director at Memphis Center for Reproducti­ve Health, a group that is a plaintiff in the lawsuit.

Last week, Davidson County District Attorney General Glenn Funk submitted a court filing that stated he does not believe the law is constituti­onal and does not intend to enforce it.

A drug-induced abortion, also called a medical abortion, involves taking two drugs. The first — mifepristo­ne — thins the lining of the uterus and loosens the connection between the embryo and the uterine lining. The second — misoprosto­l — softens and opens the cervix and causes contractio­ns to push out the embryo.

A medical abortion reversal involves giving the patient progestero­ne after the first step of the procedure. Progestero­ne is a hormone that thickens the uterine lining and inhibits contractio­ns.

The American Congress of Obstetrici­ans and Gynecologi­sts has said there is no medically accepted evidence that a drug-induced abortion can be interrupte­d.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States