Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

U.S. race inquiries vex lawyers

Firms asked to square black-exec pledge, civil-rights law

- PAIGE SMITH, JEFF GREEN, PATRICIA HURTADO AND CHRISTIAN BERTHELSEN

A U.S. inquiry into whether Microsoft Corp. and Wells Fargo & Co. broke workplace civil- rights laws by seeking to double their ranks of Black leaders is at odds with normal Labor Department practice, including the enforcemen­t of a decades-old executive order on affirmativ­e action, legal experts said.

The executive order, issued one year after the 1964 Civil Rights Act, requires that federal contractor­s maintain affirmativ­e action outreach efforts and prohibits discrimina­tion in hiring. The Labor Department’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs cited the order in a letter to Microsoft asking how the software maker would meet its commitment to beef up Black leadership “without discrimina­ting on the basis of race.”

Black workers held less than 3% of positions in executive and management job categories at the company as of last year, according to its annual diversity and inclusion report.

Affirmativ­e action programs don’t constitute unlawful discrimina­tion, Fortney & Scott co-founder David Fortney said in an interview.

The Labor Department’s letters to Microsoft and Wells Fargo investigat­ing their diversity efforts are “troubling on several levels,” said Fortney, whose firm specialize­s in representi­ng employers in matters before the compliance program office.

“The government is not authorized to simply demand access to informatio­n from Microsoft or other federal contractor­s,” Fortney said.

Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia “has committed that DOL will follow the rule of law. If OFCCP wants to change how affirmativ­e action operates, then there should be a formal rule-making, including notice and an opportunit­y to comment,” he said.

Microsoft recently settled Labor Department claims of discrimina­tion in hiring, agreeing to pay $3 million. But those claims were about disadvanta­ging minority applicants, while the department’s new inquiries appear to be concerned with the opposite.

Either way, the Microsoft agreement “is not a fishing license for the collection of new data and informatio­n,” Fortney said.

Samuel Bagenstos, a law professor at the University of Michigan who served in the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division under President Barack Obama, called the Labor Department’s letters “a perversion of what they were set up to do.”

“If you look at what Microsoft says it’s doing, they’re making sure that they have a sufficient pipeline of people, so that when it comes time to make promotion decisions, they’re not arbitraril­y excluding African Americans and minorities from management positions,” Bagenstos said.

“I think the best way to think about this is another one of those Trump culture war acts that are being taken right before the election,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States