Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

U.S. warns on diversity hiring

Federal contracts at risk if practices discrimina­te, letter says

- MATT O’BRIEN AND ALEXANDRA OLSON

American companies promising to hire more Black employees in leadership roles and teach their workforce about racial diversity are getting a message from President Donald Trump’s administra­tion to watch their steps if they want to keep doing business with the federal government.

Trump’s Labor Department is using a 55-year-old presidenti­al order spurred by the civilright­s movement to scrutinize companies like Microsoft and Wells Fargo over their public commitment­s to diversity. Government letters sent last week warned both companies against using “discrimina­tory practices” to meet their goals.

Microsoft has brushed off the warnings, publicly disclosing the government inquiry and defending its plan to boost Black leadership.

But advocates for corporate diversity initiative­s worry that more cautious executives will halt or scale back efforts to make their workplaces more inclusive out of fear that a wrong step could jeopardize lucrative public contracts. The agency has oversight over the hiring practices of thousands of federal contractor­s that employ roughly a quarter of all American workers.

“For tech companies that don’t care about these issues, the pronouncem­ents are a dog whistle that they can carry on discrimina­ting the way they already have,” said Laszlo Bock, an executive who ran Google’s human resources division for more than a decade and now leads software startup Humu.

Bock said those who do care, however, will see Trump’s actions as political “sound and fury” that will be hard to enforce.

“It’s not at all illegal to strive to have a workforce that reflects the makeup of your nation,” Bock said.

Democratic President Lyndon B. Johnson’s 1965 order was designed to “adjust the imbalances of hiring that are a legacy of our racist past,” said employment attorney and public contractin­g expert Daniel Abrahams.

“Trump is turning it around into an instrument of white grievances,” he added.

The president also has ordered the Labor Department to set up a new hotline to investigat­e complaints about anti

racism training sessions that Trump has called “anti-American” and “blame-focused.” The order signed last month calls attention to discussion­s of deepseated racism and privilege that could make white workers feel “discomfort” or guilt.

Trade groups representi­ng the tech and pharmaceut­ical industries are protesting Trump’s new order, saying it would restrict free speech and interfere with private sector efforts to combat systemic racism.

SPECIFIC COMMITMENT­S QUESTIONED

Trump’s executive order is a twist on Johnson’s 1965 directive and amendments that followed that set rules banning discrimina­tory practices at companies that contract with the federal government. It requires contractor­s to take “affirmativ­e action” to open the doors to hiring minorities and women.

But the Labor Department is raising questions about the specificit­y of commitment­s made by executives addressing racial injustice in response to the wave of Black Lives Matter protests that followed May’s police killing of George Floyd in Minneapoli­s.

Microsoft chief executive Satya Nadella said in June that the tech company would double the number of Black managers, senior individual contributo­rs and senior leaders by 2025. Wells Fargo CEO Charles Scharf made a similar commitment in June to doubling Black leadership over the next five years.

Abrahams said he doubts that the Labor Department has much of a case against companies that are trying to increase diversity, though “there’s some discrimina­tion against white people that’s probably actionable,” and courts have danced around the question of what happens when employers set “inflexible” targets for racial quotas.

But he said it’s more likely the Trump administra­tion is using the move as a political tactic ahead of the presidenti­al election. Trump has criticized workplace training that he says is based on critical race theory, or the idea that racism is systemic in the U.S.

COMPANY PLEDGES

Dozens of companies have ramped up their efforts to draw more Black and other minority employees into their ranks since the protests over Floyd’s death shook the country and triggered a national reckoning over race. Many have announced initiative­s specifical­ly targeting the Black community.

The CEOs of the 27 largest employers in New York — including Amazon and JPMorgan — formed a coalition to recruit 100,000 people from low-income Black, Hispanic and Asian communitie­s in the city by 2030. More than 40 companies have joined a pledge to add at least one Black member to their board of directors by 2021.

Several other top government contractor­s have set numeric goals for adding Black or Hispanic employees, including consulting firms Accenture and Deloitte.

Johnny Taylor, the CEO of the Society for Human Resource Management, said he has asked for a conference with U.S. Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia to seek clarity about the intention of the inquiries.

“I want them to ensure the companies are complying with the law but that investigat­ion doesn’t result in a chilling effect on diversity and inclusion programs,” said Taylor, whose organizati­on represents 300,000 human-resource profession­als across the world.

Taylor said he believed the policies announced by Microsoft and Wells Fargo amounted to aspiration­al goals, rather than quotas based on race. But he said announcing numbers may have opened companies to discrimina­tion complaints.

 ??  ?? Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, pictured in 2019, said in June that the tech company would double the number of Black managers, senior individual contributo­rs and senior leaders by 2025. (AP/Mark Lennihan)
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, pictured in 2019, said in June that the tech company would double the number of Black managers, senior individual contributo­rs and senior leaders by 2025. (AP/Mark Lennihan)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States