Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Rev up ‘motor voter’

System’s recurring issues need attention

-

The cries of fraud emanating from the 2020 presidenti­al contest’s losing candidate have been revealed, again and again, in the nation’s courts of law to be little more than petulance unsupporte­d by facts. Or it might be even worse: a calculated campaign that is aggressive­ly separating his supporters from their money while he’s still in a position to do that.

Meanwhile, the courts have been clear: Every election has its flaws, those anomalies reflective of any human endeavor of such a massive scale. In every national election, one can usually find an example of an election worker who handled an issue poorly or a voting precinct that had a breakdown of technology or a person who thought he was registered who then discovers he’s not when he’s trying to cast a ballot.

Even national elections in the United States are local affairs because the logistics of collecting and tabulating votes is still very much decentrali­zed. To find the folks responsibl­e for running elections in Arkansas, all it takes is a visit to county government. The state’s elections are coordinate­d by the Arkansas Secretary of State’s Office, but they are carried out through the efforts of bipartisan election commission­s in all 75 of the state’s counties.

By the time campaign seasons roll around, election commission­s and their hired staff have been planning and preparing for months. As soon as one election is over, work begins on the next along with any special elections local or state government­s call. Ask any election coordinato­r and we’re sure they’ll suggest that every election — especially the big ones like we just had on Nov. 3 — is an opportunit­y to learn from errors, mistakes and successes and apply the lessons so the next election runs more smoothly.

Our experience is the people on the front lines of preparing for and running elections take them more seriously than just about anyone else. They understand the deserved scrutiny the process will be under. They understand accountabi­lity and accuracy. They value free and fair elections perhaps more so than the average person and certainly more so than a bellyachin­g candidate who lost fair and square.

•••

As we note, however, elections are not perfect endeavors. That’s why the process and the resulting numbers are checked and cross-checked. That’s why votes cast electronic­ally are back up with printed ballots. And that’s why election commission­s conduct post-mortems after elections, to discern ways the process can be better.

And there appears to be one problem that rears its head here in Arkansas in every major election, according to officials in Benton and Washington counties. It’s known by the catchy if not very descriptiv­e term of “motor voter.” That stems from the National Voter Registrati­on Act of 1993, which was designed to make registerin­g to vote an easier propositio­n.

On the surface, it did. When an Arkansan goes to the local office of the

Department of Finance and Administra­tion — often known colloquial­ly as the revenue office or the DMV — for a transactio­n related to a driver’s license, they’re asked whether they want to register to vote or if they need to change the address on their existing voter registrati­on. If they say “yes,” the state agent takes down the needed informatio­n, that’s compiled and sent electronic­ally each day to the Arkansas Secretary of State’s Office.

Since January, more than 100,000 Arkansans have said “yes” at the revenue office.

On Nov. 3, however, several people in Washington County were forced to cast provisiona­l ballots — ones to be counted after some discrepanc­y about the voter’s eligibilit­y is cleared up. These folks told election officials they registered at the DMV, but their names did not show up on the voter rolls maintained by the Washington County Clerk’s Office.

It’s a recurring issue, everyone agrees. Washington County Election Commission member Max Deitchler called it an embarrassm­ent that Arkansans cannot rely on the system.

“This is a fundamenta­l failure of government,” he said at a recent commission meeting. “I’ve been on the commission for six years, and this happens every single election cycle that people register at the DMV and show up to vote and told they’re not registered.”

A spokesman for the Department of Finance and Administra­tion said the issue isn’t “widespread” and most people who choose the motor voter option will show up on the voter registrati­on rolls.

Which is comforting, except for those people the system failed.

“Every time we have poll worker training, somebody asks if this problem has been fixed yet,” said Jennifer Price, the election coordinato­r in Washington County.

Is anyone asking that question in the Department of Finance and Administra­tion and at the Secretary of State’s Office? Or does it happen each election cycle, only to fade back into the bureaucrac­y?

The informatio­n provided motorists advise them to follow up with their local county clerk to confirm their registrati­on. That’s wise advice, indeed. Let the voter beware and all that. If anyone knows anything about interactio­ns with government, it’s to get a receipt and follow up.

But the state shouldn’t shrug off the recurring issues, either. Even if it’s a mandated function, the two state agencies involved ought to take ownership of making the system fully reliable.

•••

As demonstrat­ed by the president’s litigation over what has amounted to small, routine election issues across the country, every little glitch can become the molehill portrayed as a mountain by politician­s and lawyers driven by something other than the well-being of our republic.

It’s incumbent on everyone involved to address any cracks in the system. Making registrati­on easy is an admirable effort. Making it reliable even more so.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States